A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

cleared, then busted



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 18th 03, 01:48 AM
Peter Gottlieb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Didn't someone here say that most pilots are Republican? I assume a large
percentage of those voted for the current administration, right?

I call it as I see it: this administration is screwing GA big time, and
their record in other areas doesn't look much better.

I like it when there is some degree of gridlock in Washington, like the
White House in the power of one party and Congress another. This tends to
slow down new legislation, which is almost always a good thing. But now
with one party in control, things seem to be getting worse rapidly. A
number of posters told me a while ago (when I made a similar comment) that
it would be better if the Republicans had complete control. I'm waiting.
Just when are things going to get better? Or at least stop getting worse?

I wish there was something *effective* we could do.



"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:Zdaub.28610$Dw6.140203@attbi_s02...
Unbelievable.

What a screwed up mess.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"




  #2  
Old November 18th 03, 03:51 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Peter Gottlieb wrote:

Didn't someone here say that most pilots are Republican? I assume a large
percentage of those voted for the current administration, right?


Based on the posts I've seen over the last few years, I'd say that the first
sentence should be in the past tense and the second sentence is correct.

George Patterson
The actions taken by the New Hampshire Episcopalians (ie. inducting a gay
bishop) are an affront to Christians everywhere. I am just thankful that
the church's founder, Henry VIII, and his wife Catherine of Aragon, and his
wife Anne Boleyn, and his wife Jane Seymour, and his wife Anne of Cleves,
and his wife Katherine Howard, and his wife Catherine Parr are no longer
here to suffer through this assault on traditional Christian marriages.
  #3  
Old November 18th 03, 08:51 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I did not vote for Bush, I would rather have a president in bed with his
intern then in bed with Big Business and screwing over the little people.


Peter Gottlieb wrote:

Didn't someone here say that most pilots are Republican? I assume a large
percentage of those voted for the current administration, right?

I call it as I see it: this administration is screwing GA big time, and
their record in other areas doesn't look much better.

I like it when there is some degree of gridlock in Washington, like the
White House in the power of one party and Congress another. This tends to
slow down new legislation, which is almost always a good thing. But now
with one party in control, things seem to be getting worse rapidly. A
number of posters told me a while ago (when I made a similar comment) that
it would be better if the Republicans had complete control. I'm waiting.
Just when are things going to get better? Or at least stop getting worse?

I wish there was something *effective* we could do.

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:Zdaub.28610$Dw6.140203@attbi_s02...
Unbelievable.

What a screwed up mess.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"



  #4  
Old November 19th 03, 02:59 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jeff" wrote in message ...
| I did not vote for Bush, I would rather have a president in bed with his
| intern then in bed with Big Business and screwing over the little people.
|

Why is this the choice? Have we become so polarized politically that we will
put up with any amount of corruption from anyone who claims to represent our
own point of view?

Maybe our first choice should be people of impeccable behavior, regardless
of their political leanings.


  #5  
Old November 19th 03, 08:00 AM
Jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My first choice would be someone honest and thought about the people instead of
filling their wallets - I think it would be hard to find someone like this in
politics

Hell, our city council woman is under investigation by the FBI for taking money
to vote a certain way on a strip club issue, its funny because this is what
congress does all the time, but they call it lobbying and its legal - thats why
nothing gets done in DC unless your a big company with alot of donations to
give.

Jeff
http://www.turboarrow3.com


C J Campbell wrote:

"Jeff" wrote in message ...
| I did not vote for Bush, I would rather have a president in bed with his
| intern then in bed with Big Business and screwing over the little people.
|

Why is this the choice? Have we become so polarized politically that we will
put up with any amount of corruption from anyone who claims to represent our
own point of view?

Maybe our first choice should be people of impeccable behavior, regardless
of their political leanings.


  #6  
Old November 19th 03, 02:12 PM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "C J Campbell" said:
Maybe our first choice should be people of impeccable behavior, regardless
of their political leanings.


My first choice would be people of impeccable principles. You got any
candidates like that? John McCain is the closest I've sean, and even he
tends to follow the political winds.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
Their constitution is unwritten, and is mostly based on common law and
practice. In other words, they do something wrong and it then becomes
the norm. -- Laurie Couturier, on the British legal system
  #7  
Old November 19th 03, 04:04 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
| In a previous article, "C J Campbell"
said:
| Maybe our first choice should be people of impeccable behavior,
regardless
| of their political leanings.
|
| My first choice would be people of impeccable principles. You got any
| candidates like that? John McCain is the closest I've sean, and even he
| tends to follow the political winds.
|

There are no such candidates left, if there ever were any. The political
parties are so obsessed with power that only the corrupt can survive.


  #8  
Old November 19th 03, 07:21 PM
Andrew Gideon
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C J Campbell wrote:

There are no such candidates left, if there ever were any. The political
parties are so obsessed with power that only the corrupt can survive.


I don't think the parties are directly to blame. Rather, it's the people
that vote for the corruption that best lines their pockets. When it comes
down to election time, politicians advertise their pork jobs. Look at
interviews of voters: many cite such "projects" as reasons to keep senior
politicians in power.

The parties are working to stay in power, true. But it's the voters that
empower corrupt government.

- Andrew

  #9  
Old November 20th 03, 04:35 AM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
| In a previous article, "C J Campbell"
said:
| Maybe our first choice should be people of impeccable behavior,
regardless
| of their political leanings.
|
| My first choice would be people of impeccable principles. You got any
| candidates like that? John McCain is the closest I've sean, and even he
| tends to follow the political winds.


For all his "impeccable principles", McCain is a statist thug.

There are no such candidates left, if there ever were any. The political
parties are so obsessed with power that only the corrupt can survive.


"There can be no doubt that the old regime in Iraq was horrible. The Hussein
regime was a classic example of how the worst get on top of any system where
the government attempts to control and plan the entire economy. As FA Hayek
taught us (1945), those who are best at wielding power are the most brutal,
rather than the most humanitarian, people among us. President Bush surely
means well in his efforts to build a new Iraqi government and in supplying
billions in aid to it, but he will likely empower a new political elite with
this policy. This new elite need not be as tyrannical as the Hussein regime,
but it may not be much better, and will hardly be capable of promoting
economic efficiency."
Slaves to the Marshall Myth
by D.W. MacKenzie
http://www.mises.org/fullstory.asp?control=1374


  #10  
Old November 19th 03, 05:46 PM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Jeff" wrote in message

...
| I did not vote for Bush, I would rather have a president in bed with his
| intern then in bed with Big Business and screwing over the little

people.
|

Why is this the choice? Have we become so polarized politically that we

will
put up with any amount of corruption from anyone who claims to represent

our
own point of view?

Maybe our first choice should be people of impeccable behavior, regardless
of their political leanings.


Yeh, but there is no place in politics for people with those qualities.
People with those qualities would rather be dead than a politician.

Politician never lie. They just tell their own truth.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cleared for an approach, then given a different altitude assignment Peter R. Instrument Flight Rules 42 December 11th 04 04:44 PM
Busted IFR Checkride Jon Kraus Instrument Flight Rules 77 May 4th 04 02:31 PM
"cleared to ... when direct ..." John Harper Instrument Flight Rules 21 February 11th 04 04:00 PM
Cleared for Hire for sale Kobra Instrument Flight Rules 0 November 25th 03 03:11 PM
rec.aviation.questions is busted Dan Jacobson General Aviation 2 November 18th 03 05:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.