![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dan
I thought Clinton on Omaha Beach took the cake for chutzpah? If your not jewish and don't know the word, just look it up. Big John On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 17:38:09 -0600, "Dan Luke" wrote: "Orval Fairbairn" wrote: Iraq would still act as a magnet for Islamic radicals, even if Bush weren't there. It is relatively easy for them to get there, as they have fellow Arabs to aid them. IMHO, it is better to have them in Iraq than in the US. But they won't stay. Before Bush's Folly, Saddam had our real enemies, the radical Islamists, under his thumb. He hated them and the feeling was mutual. Now, Iraq is a wide-open recruitment and operations wonderland for terrorists, awash with weapons for their use. We are immeasurably less secure than we were before Bush and his full-moon gazing, true-believer, neocon advisors launched this stupid war. And the Thanksgiving trip?...a shrewd electioneering stunt. If Bush is master of anything, it is the photo opp. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|