If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Just completed the trip last night. The Gorman pass is actually pretty
short, about 5 mins of flight to the LA basin, or looks like just a minute or two if I'm going to Palmsdale. A very easy pass at least for day time VFR. Now, the wind was really strong this Saturday. It's over 40kts at 9K. There is a Sigmet (is that Sigmet T?) for strong and severe turbulence at or below 17k. I got a lot of pilot reports of strong turbulence near my route and down draft over 1500fpm and these were from twins and commuters. Somehow I decided to go forward. I figure I'll reduce the speed to 100mph and climb to 11.5k and prepare to ride it out, not really sure a good decision or not. But by the time I reached the pass from the north, the air was very smooth. But I was still very nervous and figured the turbulence must be ahead at the leer side. But it never happened. It was very smooth all along. Not sure if this experience, which might make me bolder, is good or bad to me for the future. Can anyone share your experience with turbulence in mountain flying? What is really happening in a severe turbulence? Jizhong On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 20:38:07 -0800, wrote: Jim, Thanks. I like simple rules. It's comfortable to hear about your rule. So I should not do a night mountaineous flight with a single engine. But I'm nore sure about the other two combination: SE at night or SE over mountains. I'm also a little more reserved to do a night mountaneously than yesterday. That's why I'm here hitting the keyboard. Now, by the way, my proposed route is only a 10min flight over a pass. Flat land both sides. Jizhong On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:43:03 -0800, Jim Weir wrote: Single Engine Night Mountains Pick any two. Jim (CFI from the mountains) shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: I'm thinking of a night flight. Will this be a -foolish choice to cross the Gorman pass in the dark? - -Jizhong Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Jim, now I have (assuming that's what I call Gorman Pass). :-) Do you really think it's that hard? Jizhong On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 09:45:08 -0800, Jim Weir wrote: Obviously you've never been over the Grapevine before. Jim shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: Now, by the way, my proposed route is only a 10min flight -over a pass. Flat land both sides. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Greg,
Very nice post. Thanks. I just posted my shrot "pass" report. I said 5 min of passage. After reading your post, I realize that I could be wrong. But that's certainly my honest impression. I was too concered with the coming turbulence. I'm still not sure if I want to do a night pass on the Grapevine. At daytime, there looks like quite a few places at the foothills or near the shore of the lakes that make good emergency landing spot. But it would be impossible to tell at night. I feel like I will never land at/on a highway. I hate eletricution when I'm dying. But I figure if I ever fly at night through the Grapevine, I-5 would be a nice to follow and avoid the moutains nearby. Jizhong On Sat, 22 Nov 2003 22:00:57 GMT, "Greg Goodknight" wrote: Jim, I've been over the Grapevine at night multiple times. In VMC, the area is such that it is rare to not be within gliding distance of some lit chunk of pavement that is more hospitable than the usual invisible night granite. It is certainly more than a 10 minute passage, though; I'm not sure where he got that number. Many twins have such poor single engine performance that the extra engine does little besides give a false sense of security; it will indeed allow you to fly to the accident site. Having a well maintained single with a low Vs and better glide ratio can be as safe. Safe is a very relative term here. The "pick any two" from "Single Engine, Night, Mountains" guide is a good starting point to evaluate a plan and to give folks pause, but as a real go/nogo rule I think it is too simplistic. To the unitiated, Tejon Pass (also known as Gorman or the Grapevine) is between the California Central valley and the San Fernando Valley of Los Angeles. There is an 8040' peak just 8 miles to the west of the airway and a few others that are nearly as tall; to the east, the hills are nearly to 6000'. And a four lane (each way) freeway known as Interstate 5 cuts through it, the main artery between northern and southern California. The actual pass is marked as being at 4239'. The MEA on the V 23 airway is 9500', a good bet for a night VMC flight and it has radar coverage by Bakersfield Approach and LA Center. In my Cherokee, at night in VMC, IFR or VFR Flight Following, I'd not hesitate to fly the Grapevine (and *some* other mountainous routes) with a flight plan filed and both eyes open. *Might* be doing it again on Wednesday eve, although I-5 will be bumper to bumper and not a good emergency landing choice (it really never is, anyway). If VFR I make the occasional call to FSS (if a long flight) to update position just like my primary instructor had me do in 1974 when flying the Grapevine on my long solo XC on my way to Bakersfield, Santa Barbara and back to Brackett/Pomona. -Greg "Jim Weir" wrote in message .. . Obviously you've never been over the Grapevine before. Jim shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: Now, by the way, my proposed route is only a 10min flight -over a pass. Flat land both sides. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Jumped into this late as I just saw it...but
did you do the flight? If so I bet it was alot less eventful than you guessed it'd be. Is this an owned or rented C182? Rented I'd have a few more reservations, owned and well known - not that many. This night/single engine/mountain flight stuff is always a hot topic amongst a couple pilot friends of mine. Perhaps history and training has something to do with it (they were trained where mountains are no higher than 2k, I was trained from the Continental Divide and west). As far as the 2 out of 3 rule, if those 2 are single engine and mountains, is that a no-go factor? I guess I'd never fly then. This IS a C182 you're talking about, right? They go considerably higher than 4k or even 8 or 10k feet. What is the comfort level then? Gliding distance to an airport? 3-4k above terrain? Does that number change based on winds or cloud coverage? I'll take clear night VFR over Gorman than solid IMC down there in the day. Personally I'd take the Gorman routing over the coast (IMC) or Tehachapi Pass (strong winds), but have done each several times. Now I have to deal with passes no lower than 10k if I want to go west, they arent to be feared, just respected. Just for grins I fired up Anywhere Map Flight Planner, it's the one with the "Cones of Safety" that put circles around airports. It is based on your altitude and the glide performance you plug in. It doesn't account for winds. Over GMN at 8,500 you'd be still within glide range of CL96, and over GRAPE intersection within gliding distance of 7CA2. There is a gap in between though. Bump that up to 10,500 and that gap is gone. Use those numbers as you will, no guarantees you'd make those airfields, may have to do everything RIGHT to make it, but it's not like flying through the Andes. I guess what I'm trying to say is, personally, I don't make my go no-go decisions based on personal opinions to the extent I sit and not go at all. Typical scenario for me is to get in the air, climb up, and make my decision before the point of no return. Often times that's at 12,500 approaching the Continental Divide westbound. The decision has to be made to climb, continue forward, take notice of up/downdrafts and turbulence, visibility on both sides of the pass, etc. This is without the benefit of a international airport width continuous runway (I-5) below. Foolish to make this flight? I think not. The fact you ask it though... if you're not confident in your decision making skills or the airplane, then you should have doubts. Go get a mountain checkout, and read the book "Mountain Flying Bible" by Sparky Imeson. Just for fun fly it with FS2004, it'll give you some idea what it'd look like with varying altitudes, weather, and darkness. Cut the engine while you're at it. Simple rules don't apply to all decisions. As far as IFR or VFR - fly VFR with flight following, that way you can pick your route and fly directly over airports as you see fit. The airways don't always do this for you. And Greg, that "Bakersfield, Santa Barbara and back to Brackett/Pomona" mustve been popular with instructors, mine assigned that one to me, too. In a Traumahawk no less. Chris |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Patrick AFB, NASA-KSC Area Log - Tuesday 09 March 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | March 10th 04 06:15 AM |
Patrick AFB Area Log - Friday, 27 Feb 2004 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | February 28th 04 06:15 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Patrick AFB Area Log, Monday 30 June 2003 | AllanStern | Military Aviation | 0 | July 1st 03 06:37 AM |