![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bill Funk" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue" wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of people armed with nothing more than a drink cart. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:08:13 GMT, "Scout"
wrote: "Bill Funk" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue" wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of people armed with nothing more than a drink cart. How did they open a locked bullet proof door with a drink cart? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() " Bogart " wrote in message s.com... On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:08:13 GMT, "Scout" wrote: "Bill Funk" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 10:37:33 -0700, "Kevin McCue" wrote: Wanna bet your life that they wouldn't miss? I wouldn't. I'd rather deal with the terrorist. Since the Dept. of Homeland Insecurity seems to think that the terrorist are likely trained ATP's how will the Air Marshal stop them when they are locked behind that now reinforced, bullet proof cockpit door? The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of people armed with nothing more than a drink cart. How did they open a locked bullet proof door with a drink cart? They rammed the door with it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reminds me of an old Patton quote- "Fixed defenses are tributes to the
stupidity of mankind." Guns or no, the best defense against hijackers will be the pax themselves- of course if the hijackers manage to get some weapons on board first then more pax will be killed than necessary, but I don't see terrorists being able to do anything more than down the plane. 9/11 succeded only because of its novelty. -cwk. "Scout" wrote in message . .. The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. Right, which is why it was managed to be opened by a couple of people armed with nothing more than a drink cart. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill Funk wrote
The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Wouldn't the pilots have to open the door at some point to go to the bathroom or for the stewardess to serve them food and coffee? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Stasiak wrote:
Bill Funk wrote The only way a terrorist could get behind that locked, bullet proof door is for someone to open it. The British pliots (or rather, their union) seem to think that having the pilots open that door is a really good idea. Wouldn't the pilots have to open the door at some point to go to the bathroom or for the stewardess to serve them food and coffee? Why not? Your point? With SIMPLE safe guards, that is a SUPER simple and easy task to accomplish without risk to passengers or the flight crew, let alone any target below even IF that system was breached. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |