![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"john smith" wrote in message
... [...] Had you need to do a go around, the cruise mixture would have been sufficient for a full power go-around. You do understand that he's talking about a turbocharged engine, right? Generally speaking, full rich is the correct mixture setting for a turbocharged piston engine, for full-power takeoffs regardless of altitude. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Duniho wrote: You do understand that he's talking about a turbocharged engine, right? Generally speaking, full rich is the correct mixture setting for a turbocharged piston engine, for full-power takeoffs regardless of altitude. 'Generally speaking', but not necessarily. Full-rich is the correct takeoff setting for a FUEL-INJECTED engine regardless of altitude, but *not* for a CARBURETED engine. Most turbocharged engines are injected, but not all. In fact, the Turbo 182 has one that isn't: a (carbureted) Lyc 0-540. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Really - my carbureted 182 calls for full rich on takeoff
"Mark Mallory" wrote in message ... 'Generally speaking', but not necessarily. Full-rich is the correct takeoff setting for a FUEL-INJECTED engine regardless of altitude, but *not* for a CARBURETED engine. Most turbocharged engines are injected, but not all. In fact, the Turbo 182 has one that isn't: a (carbureted) Lyc 0-540. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael 182 wrote: Really - my carbureted 182 calls for full rich on takeoff So does mine - at SL on a standard day. But not on a hot 95 degF afternoon at 5000 MSL. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
"john smith" wrote in message ... [...] Had you need to do a go around, the cruise mixture would have been sufficient for a full power go-around. You do understand that he's talking about a turbocharged engine, right? Generally speaking, full rich is the correct mixture setting for a turbocharged piston engine, for full-power takeoffs regardless of altitude. Yes, I remembered the turbo part this afternoon. For descent there is no reason to change the mixture unless you are going to push the throttle back in beyond the cruise power setting. For takeoff, the turbo should maintain sealevel power up to 12,000 feet MSL, so full rich or slightly leaned mixture would be used on takeoff. I think I would still lean for best power prior to releasing brakes for takeoff. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"john smith" wrote in message
... [...] For takeoff, the turbo should maintain sealevel power up to 12,000 feet MSL, so full rich or slightly leaned mixture would be used on takeoff. I think I would still lean for best power prior to releasing brakes for takeoff. You need to use full rich to keep the exhaust temperature down. With the turbocharged engine I normally fly, in my airplane, about a third of the fuel is used just for cooling (30 gph at full power, when theoretically only about 20 gph would be needed for the 270 hp). The turbocharger controller ensures that I am getting best power, without any fiddling with the mixture at all. Even in an aircraft with a manual wastegate, one would ensure best power using that control, not the mixture. Pete |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Barry Klein" wrote in message
om... We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! My airplane, with a Lycoming TIO-540, will do the same thing at high altitude airports if the mixture is set full-rich prior to touchdown. Operationally, I simply leave the mixture alone during descent. Given that descents are usually made at reduced power, theoretically I could even lean the mixture during the descent (opposite of what you'd normally do with a normally aspirated engine at power settings near cruise), but I just keep an eye on the turbine inlet temperature and normally no change in mixture setting is required to keep the TIT in the ballpark of 1500 F. During a go-around, it is critical that I remember to push the mixture full-rich, but since it is just as critical that the engine not stop until I am actually done flying the airplane, this is an acceptable trade-off. I also need to keep the mixture lean while taxiing, otherwise I get fouled plugs. I asked my mechanic about both issues (since they seem related) and he verified that the idle mixture is correct for my installation. It just runs rich at or near idle power unless the mixture is manually adjusted. At higher density altitudes, idle mixture is so rich it will flood the engine and make it stop. [...] Later that day, when taxiing for takoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. I assume you mean you just did this as a test during taxi, and that you returned the mixture to full rich before takeoff? When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Sounds about right, but I don't know the specifics for that engine. It might be that it's supposed to be higher. I would ask the mechanic maintaining the aircraft if he has the engine manual for the engine installed, and then you can read in that what the actual numbers should be. Pete |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everyone for the info. This was my first flight in a turbo, my
experience is with non-turbo 182s. My buddy was in the left seat for the landing, 6750', about 50 deg F. I'm not sure what he did for final approach, may have gone to full rich. Ragards, Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Duniho" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.piloting Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 3:01 PM Subject: Turbo 182: correct mixture for final approach at high altitude? "Barry Klein" wrote in message om... We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! My airplane, with a Lycoming TIO-540, will do the same thing at high altitude airports if the mixture is set full-rich prior to touchdown. Operationally, I simply leave the mixture alone during descent. Given that descents are usually made at reduced power, theoretically I could even lean the mixture during the descent (opposite of what you'd normally do with a normally aspirated engine at power settings near cruise), but I just keep an eye on the turbine inlet temperature and normally no change in mixture setting is required to keep the TIT in the ballpark of 1500 F. During a go-around, it is critical that I remember to push the mixture full-rich, but since it is just as critical that the engine not stop until I am actually done flying the airplane, this is an acceptable trade-off. I also need to keep the mixture lean while taxiing, otherwise I get fouled plugs. I asked my mechanic about both issues (since they seem related) and he verified that the idle mixture is correct for my installation. It just runs rich at or near idle power unless the mixture is manually adjusted. At higher density altitudes, idle mixture is so rich it will flood the engine and make it stop. [...] Later that day, when taxiing for takoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. I assume you mean you just did this as a test during taxi, and that you returned the mixture to full rich before takeoff? Yes, we did this just to get a smooth idle for taxi. We went full rich on the takeoff roll and climbed out to 8500' nicely. I just mentioned this to demonstrate how lean we needed to go to get to the best power setting at 1200 rpm. When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Sounds about right, but I don't know the specifics for that engine. It might be that it's supposed to be higher. I would ask the mechanic maintaining the aircraft if he has the engine manual for the engine installed, and then you can read in that what the actual numbers should be. Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
is this a turbo charged engine also?
I have taken off with a DA of 8800 ft, full rich and not had a problem in my T-arrow I use full rich on take off and landing, as my POH says to do. Peter Duniho wrote: My airplane, with a Lycoming TIO-540, will do the same thing at high altitude airports if the mixture is set full-rich prior to touchdown. Operationally, I simply leave the mixture alone during descent. Given that descents are usually made at reduced power, theoretically I could even lean the mixture during the descent (opposite of what you'd normally do with a normally aspirated engine at power settings near cruise), but I just keep an eye on the turbine inlet temperature and normally no change in mixture setting is required to keep the TIT in the ballpark of 1500 F. During a go-around, it is critical that I remember to push the mixture full-rich, but since it is just as critical that the engine not stop until I am actually done flying the airplane, this is an acceptable trade-off. I also need to keep the mixture lean while taxiing, otherwise I get fouled plugs. I asked my mechanic about both issues (since they seem related) and he verified that the idle mixture is correct for my installation. It just runs rich at or near idle power unless the mixture is manually adjusted. At higher density altitudes, idle mixture is so rich it will flood the engine and make it stop. [...] Later that day, when taxiing for takoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. I assume you mean you just did this as a test during taxi, and that you returned the mixture to full rich before takeoff? When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Sounds about right, but I don't know the specifics for that engine. It might be that it's supposed to be higher. I would ask the mechanic maintaining the aircraft if he has the engine manual for the engine installed, and then you can read in that what the actual numbers should be. Pete |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff" wrote in message
... is this a turbo charged engine also? Is what a turbocharged engine also? Both the engine that John Smith is talking about and the engine that I am talking about are turbocharged, as we both stated in our posts. I have taken off with a DA of 8800 ft, full rich and not had a problem in my T-arrow I use full rich on take off and landing, as my POH says to do. Have you landed with a DA of 8800' with the mixture full rich? On my airplane (and apparently John's), the engine would stop on rollout. That said, maybe you have a superior fuel system on the Turbo Arrow, or perhaps the engine is just somehow inherently more immune to overly rich mixtures. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |