![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes that was the question, I did not see where you said yours was a turbo
charged also, must have over looked it. yes I have landed to refuel with the DA at 8800 ft. Is it superior - beats me, I just follow my POH and havnt had a problem yet. Peter Duniho wrote: Is what a turbocharged engine also? Both the engine that John Smith is talking about and the engine that I am talking about are turbocharged, as we both stated in our posts. I have taken off with a DA of 8800 ft, full rich and not had a problem in my T-arrow I use full rich on take off and landing, as my POH says to do. Have you landed with a DA of 8800' with the mixture full rich? On my airplane (and apparently John's), the engine would stop on rollout. That said, maybe you have a superior fuel system on the Turbo Arrow, or perhaps the engine is just somehow inherently more immune to overly rich mixtures. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a turbo arrow, my POH also says full rich on take off. Thats what
I use on take off and landing. I do not adjust the miicture untill I am at cruise altitude. how come you didnt just set it to full rich like the book suggested? you either have a fixed or an automatic wastegate, the automatic wastegate will use the turbo as needed. the key is to fly as the book says to fly and not try to out guess the airplane. Barry Klein wrote: We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! We had the mixture set about 100 deg rich of peak TIT for cruise at 9500. How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? This is not addressed in the POH. It does say full rich on takoff regardless of airport elevation. Later that day, when taxiing for takoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Thanks, Barry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. The mixture was too rich.
This is a common problem with big-bore engines when operated above 3000 MSL. What we teach at Colorado Pilots Association is to set the mixture to 15 GPH as you enter the pattern at (near) cruise power. That way the engine continues to run on the ground. :-) Of course, if you do a balked landing, you MUST push the mixture full in after you increase the power for the go around. Barry Klein wrote: We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! We had the mixture set about 100 deg rich of peak TIT for cruise at 9500. How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? This is not addressed in the POH. It does say full rich on takoff regardless of airport elevation. Later that day, when taxiing for takoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Thanks, Barry Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer'at'frii.com WEB http://www.frii.net/~jer C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider, FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot, BM218 HAM N0FZD, 197 Young Eagles! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jeff
wrote: maybe a stupid question, but if its going to quit on you when you go full rich on landing, then dont it also risk the chance of quitting if you go full rich on a go around? unless its just the high power that keeps it running and idle is what kills it. Go around on approach (depending on height AGL), you will still have some air under you and it is amazing how fast your hand will push that mixture lever forward. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff wrote:
maybe a stupid question, but if its going to quit on you when you go full rich on landing, then dont it also risk the chance of quitting if you go full rich on a go around? unless its just the high power that keeps it running and idle is what kills it. Your guesstimation is correct! The higher power can deal with the enrichened mixture, and your balked landing (go around) will succeed. Notice that I said below to increase the power, then the mixtu Of course, if you do a balked landing, you MUST push the mixture full in after you increase the power for the go around. Best regards, Jer/ wrote: Yes. The mixture was too rich. This is a common problem with big-bore engines when operated above 3000 MSL. What we teach at Colorado Pilots Association is to set the mixture to 15 GPH as you enter the pattern at (near) cruise power. That way the engine continues to run on the ground. :-) Of course, if you do a balked landing, you MUST push the mixture full in after you increase the power for the go around. Barry Klein wrote: We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! We had the mixture set about 100 deg rich of peak TIT for cruise at 9500. How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? This is not addressed in the POH. It does say full rich on takeoff regardless of airport elevation. Later that day, when taxiing for takeoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Thanks, Barry Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer'at'frii.com WEB http://www.frii.net/~jer C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider, FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot, BM218 HAM N0FZD, 197 Young Eagles! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you would think that since its a turbo airplane, cessna would expect it to be
used at high altitude airports so they would have made it so it would not cut out on landing. wrote: Jeff wrote: maybe a stupid question, but if its going to quit on you when you go full rich on landing, then dont it also risk the chance of quitting if you go full rich on a go around? unless its just the high power that keeps it running and idle is what kills it. Your guesstimation is correct! The higher power can deal with the enrichened mixture, and your balked landing (go around) will succeed. Notice that I said below to increase the power, then the mixtu Of course, if you do a balked landing, you MUST push the mixture full in after you increase the power for the go around. Best regards, Jer/ wrote: Yes. The mixture was too rich. This is a common problem with big-bore engines when operated above 3000 MSL. What we teach at Colorado Pilots Association is to set the mixture to 15 GPH as you enter the pattern at (near) cruise power. That way the engine continues to run on the ground. :-) Of course, if you do a balked landing, you MUST push the mixture full in after you increase the power for the go around. Barry Klein wrote: We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! We had the mixture set about 100 deg rich of peak TIT for cruise at 9500. How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? This is not addressed in the POH. It does say full rich on takeoff regardless of airport elevation. Later that day, when taxiing for takeoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Thanks, Barry Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer'at'frii.com WEB http://www.frii.net/~jer C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider, FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot, BM218 HAM N0FZD, 197 Young Eagles! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jeff" wrote in message
... you would think that since its a turbo airplane, cessna would expect it to be used at high altitude airports so they would have made it so it would not cut out on landing. And yet, this is a common enough issue, with many different makes and models of turbocharged aircraft. Why single Cessna out? There's all sorts of inconveniences related to the technologies used in "modern" aircraft. One of them happens to be the likelihood of engine stoppage if the mixture is set to full-rich at high density altitudes. This isn't unique to Cessna, and it seems to me it's along the lines of "Doc, it hurts when I do this..." joke. Since it "hurts" when one does that, one just doesn't do that. Simple enough, IMHO. The main problem is that, for some reason, pilots who are introduced to turbocharged aircraft are often not told about the need to avoid full-rich mixture settings at high density altitudes. This was true of me (I found out myself the hard way...only took two high altitude landings for me to figure it out though ![]() other pilots as well. Pete |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Barry
Klein wrote: How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? My best advice is to go to www.avweb.com and read all of John Deakin's articles on engine operation. These are gems of wisdom that every flight instructor should have in their kit. Somewhere I read an article that related that many aircraft carburetors/injectors are not properly set for idle. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How does it idle? 500 rpm is the bottom end... Another 25 - 30 rpm may help
if it is idling rough... On the issue of full rich, if you are landing at a low altitude airport then progressivley enriching the mixture in the descent,arriving at full rich on short final, makes sense, as the air density in the manifold will be reasonably high, even after the turbo has spun down and is not boosting much... But, if you are landing at an altitude airport, then the throttle pulled back will allow the turbo to spin down, same as for low altitude airports, but the intake manifold air density will be low thin and full rich may lead to a flame out - especially if you have to hit the throttle for a missed approach, wind shear, etc... Full rich with full throttle is likely to cause a stumble/stall at that point.... I would tend to keep it reasonably lean during descent and approach to avoid plug fouling and to keep it warm, only going to the 'appropriate' takeoff setting on short final, which is not necessarily full rich at higher altitude airports... You have already done your homework and know how far in to put the mixture on short final for the airport you were at... For takeoff, I would run up to 1800 rpm and lean for best power, knowing that full throttle will enrich the mixture further, automatically... Just watch your manifold pressure and cylinder head temps during climbout and richen slightly if needed... denny "Barry Klein" wrote in message om... We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |