![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:30:57 GMT, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in Message-Id: .net: "Larry Dighera" wrote in message .. . The article contained this bit of information: "Brazil's new requirement that American visitors submit to photographs and fingerprinting ... which is how Brazilians are welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules." I would say that the U.S. instituted practice of fingerprinting and photographing airline passengers entering our country may spark similar indignities for U.S. passengers entering foreign countries. But why just for US passengers? The US didn't single out Brazil or any other individual country, the requirement applies to all passengers not otherwise documented. What does your phrase "not otherwise documented" mean? Other than what? Aren't all international travelers required to possess a Passport? Are you saying that ALL airline passengers entering the US are currently being fingerprinted and photographed? If so, this is the first I've heard of that practice being instituted. Your reply implies that you believe that Brazil has "singled out" US passengers for fingerprinting and photographing. Are you able to provide a credible citation substantiating that contention? The quoted article's lack of explicitly stating that Brazil is requiring fingerprinting and photographing _solely_ of US passengers is ambiguous IMO. First, the US is photographing and fingerprinting all foreign nationals that are required to have a Visa to enter the USA. Brazil is included in that group. Brazil is ONLY photographing & fingerprinting US citizens. Is this fair? Sure it is. Brazil is a sovereign nation and can control their borders any way they choose. Is it being done because we are doing it to them and not for security reasons? Sure it is, but again it is their country and they can do what they want to do at its' borders. If anyone as an American citizen doesn't like it don't go to Brazil. Gig Giacona www.peoamerica.net/N601WR |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yo Gig...
On keeping my american dollars at home, you got it! Lessee, the American Virgin Islands ought to be nice and warm right now... denny "Gig Giacona" If anyone as an American citizen doesn't like it don't go to Brazil. Gig Giacona www.peoamerica.net/N601WR |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig Giacona" wrote in message ... | | | First, the US is photographing and fingerprinting all foreign nationals that | are required to have a Visa to enter the USA. Brazil is included in that | group. Brazil is ONLY photographing & fingerprinting US citizens. | | Is this fair? Sure it is. Brazil is a sovereign nation and can control their | borders any way they choose. Is it being done because we are doing it to | them and not for security reasons? Sure it is, but again it is their country | and they can do what they want to do at its' borders. | | If anyone as an American citizen doesn't like it don't go to Brazil. I am reminded of a policy some states used to have that charged Californians more to use their state parks. Of course, the policy was entirely in retaliation for California charging out of state visitors more. I would not let Brazil's policy keep me from visiting that country. Come to think of it, I kind of like their feisty attitude. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... The article contained this bit of information: "Brazil's new requirement that American visitors submit to photographs and fingerprinting ... which is how Brazilians are welcomed to the U.S. under new security rules." I would say that the U.S. instituted practice of fingerprinting and photographing airline passengers entering our country may spark similar indignities for U.S. passengers entering foreign countries. But why just for US passengers? The US didn't single out Brazil or any other individual country, the requirement applies to all passengers not otherwise documented. Simple: it is called reciprocal. If you let my citizen into your country without a visa, then I will let your citizen into my country without a visa. If you are charging my citizien 200$ processing fee, them I will charge your citizen 200$ processing fee. If you don't require my citizen to present a passport (just an ID is good enough), then I don't require your citizen do present a passport. If you are fingerprinting my citizen, then I will fingerprint your citizen. I am glad that Brazil had the guts to stand up against arrogance. jue |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 9th 04 11:25 PM |
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 07:31 PM |