![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Gene Seibel wrote: Military aircraft in MOA's are often given blocks of altitude. That's different. Once in the MOA they are not IFR. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Continental Express conducts some training within 150 miles of my area,
and at night, I have heard them request and recieve blocks of airspace (big pie wedges) that are thousands of feet deep for airborne maneuvering. Im presuming that they are required to operate under IFR by company or Fed/Op Spec guidelines, so to conduct these maneuvers in IFR requires the chunk of airspace, hence the "block" Dave AES/newspost wrote: Listening to channel nine on UA 1225 Denver-Reno yesterday, I heard something like: "Denver Center, Jackpot 123, can we request a block allocation for 39 to 41?" and then "Jackpot 123, Denver Center, block allocation 39 to 41 approved." ["Jackpot 123" is made-up name since I don't remember actual name; maybe it was "block assignment" instead of "allocation"; and I don't recall if the wording was "Flight levels 39 to 41" or just the numbers.] Anyway, I'm assuming that "Jackpot 1243" wanted to move up and down freely between 39,000 and 41,000 feet seeking smoothest ride and best fuel economy without having to make repeated requests; and Denver Center was willing to approve this since nobody else was up that high anyway. Is that likely the case? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave S wrote:
Continental Express conducts some training within 150 miles of my area, and at night, I have heard them request and recieve blocks of airspace (big pie wedges) that are thousands of feet deep for airborne maneuvering. Im presuming that they are required to operate under IFR by company or Fed/Op Spec guidelines, so to conduct these maneuvers in IFR requires the chunk of airspace, hence the "block" When flying a glider in Class A airspace pursuant to an LOA, I call to open what we colloquially refer to as a "wave window." The phone at ATC is always answered "Military Desk" which I presume is the desk responsible for controlling "blocks" of airspace that are defined by geographical limits (set in the LOA). ATC will ask for the name of the block (also defined in the LOA), the requested altitude block (typically from the bottom of Class A to FL250 to start) check it in the computer and then advise if/when it can be opened. These "blocks" opened by the military desk are geographically defined blocks as well as altitude blocks, and we're free to roam within the altitude and geographic limits of the block while it's open. Todd Pattist (Remove DONTSPAMME from address to email reply.) ___ Make a commitment to learn something from every flight. Share what you learn. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Often air to air refueling flights will request and get block altitudes but
generally they are around 30K' not 40K'. Mike MU-2 "AES/newspost" wrote in message ... Listening to channel nine on UA 1225 Denver-Reno yesterday, I heard something like: "Denver Center, Jackpot 123, can we request a block allocation for 39 to 41?" and then "Jackpot 123, Denver Center, block allocation 39 to 41 approved." ["Jackpot 123" is made-up name since I don't remember actual name; maybe it was "block assignment" instead of "allocation"; and I don't recall if the wording was "Flight levels 39 to 41" or just the numbers.] Anyway, I'm assuming that "Jackpot 1243" wanted to move up and down freely between 39,000 and 41,000 feet seeking smoothest ride and best fuel economy without having to make repeated requests; and Denver Center was willing to approve this since nobody else was up that high anyway. Is that likely the case? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New "Rhinos" on the block (& farewell to low-viz) | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | November 25th 04 08:24 AM |
B-2 question | Harley W Daugherty | Military Aviation | 37 | August 27th 04 12:45 AM |
Block out someone? (Little Hitler) | Jeff | Military Aviation | 6 | April 13th 04 07:03 PM |
More Info on Block 52 F-16 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | November 18th 03 03:07 PM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |