![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:23:51 GMT, Roger Halstead
wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:56:21 -0500, Peter R. wrote: His point was that the heavier the aircraft, the more the nose will come slamming down on the runway in a stalled landing. This pilot has a lot of experience in twins, as well, if that explains anything. Actually the Bo won't do that, at least not if it's in ground effect. To get it to stall usually takes a "relatively" nose high attitude. When it stalls onto the runway "from a normal height" the nose does not drop at all. It stays put and the mains drop down which is kind of a strange sensation at first. Because the typical Bonanza's cg has shifted to the rear on fuel burn? If the worry isn't that it won't pound the nose on landing, then you really need to watch that airspeed turning final. It won't go nose-down when you really need it to. But its been stated that most pilots land it hot anyway. Seems there's a legit reason for it. Or have I missed something in this thread? Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 17:20:28 -0600, Mike Rhodes
wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 22:23:51 GMT, Roger Halstead wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:56:21 -0500, Peter R. wrote: His point was that the heavier the aircraft, the more the nose will come slamming down on the runway in a stalled landing. This pilot has a lot of experience in twins, as well, if that explains anything. Actually the Bo won't do that, at least not if it's in ground effect. To get it to stall usually takes a "relatively" nose high attitude. When it stalls onto the runway "from a normal height" the nose does not drop at all. It stays put and the mains drop down which is kind of a strange sensation at first. Because the typical Bonanza's cg has shifted to the rear on fuel burn? No. If you do your W&B calcs it's not a problem. The older Bo "Prior to 74 only had 1000# useful load and the CG shift isn't a problem like the more recent models. However in either case it's not due to a CG shift. When within the CG a Bo stalled "In Ground Effect" does not drop the nose. I can load mine with 100 gallons (30 in the tip tanks, 50 mains, and 20 in the aux) and never have to worry about it going out of CG) if I start in the middle. If the worry isn't that it won't pound the nose on landing, then you really need to watch that airspeed turning final. It won't go You always need to watch the speed of any airplane. nose-down when you really need it to. But its been stated that most It will go nose down if you want it too, but why would you want it to drop the nose. Speed and power = attitude. IF the airspeed indicator goes out, you know that so many inches of MP and so many degrees up on the AI are still going to get you where you want to go. With the power set you rarely have to look at the instruments if you know what it's supposed to look like outside. When I land, I do full stall landings and I keep the nose in the air until I no longer have enough elevator authority to keep it there and that is down around 30 to 40 MPH which is well after touch down. (Stall with me alone and half fuel is only 55 MPH) That would make the last part of final at 71 MPH which is one steep descent. pilots land it hot anyway. Seems there's a legit reason for it. Pure baloney. The Airsafety Foundation and American Bonanza Society teach the pilots to fly "by the numbers" and that means sticking to the book figures. They require every pilot taking their pilot proficiency course to calculate the speed for each landing and take off and they expect to see you fly it. They do not want to see pilots adding 5 for the wife and another for the kids and maybe an extra 10 for comfort. They are very adamant about excess speed on landing being a killer If need be I can quote right from the ABS/ASF Pilot Proficiency Training Manual as to their requirements. That class runs 10 hours of class room and 4 to 5 hours of flight time. There is no problem bringing in a Bo at 1.3 Vso in calm conditions. If the winds kick up, add half the gust factor. The Bo is a very good short field airplane for those who learn how to handle them. Or have I missed something in this thread? Could be? According to the ABS the big problem is pilots who make their own rules and add a bit of speed instead of following the POH. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dennis O'Connor wrote: Full stall landings are what you should be doing... With the wheels 6 inches off, the nose should be up and the horn sounding when touchdown occurs... One thing that took me a while to appreciate when I transitioned from C-172 spring steel gear to my Comanche's strut cusioned mains is that you really do need to thump slightly to compress the struts and get some traction. If you roll it on you are still flying, you just happen to be dragging your tires along at the same time. And it extends the transition between steering with the rudder and steering with the nosewheel, which in a crosswind is a recipe for getting sideways (which your mains will happily accommodate since they don't have much weight yet). -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
Congratulations! I have recently transitioned into an S35 with a 300HP IO-550 . What an airplane! These airplanes are real movers, are very slippery, and descents have to be planned well in advance. It's very easy to get to VNE quickly when you nose it over. In the airplane I'm flying I've found that once I get down to TPA or level outside the FAF, 18" and 2400RPM gets me down to 140kts pretty quickly if altitude is held. Once the gear and 10 degrees of flaps are out it flys like a Cherokee and is easy to land. I've been told that (at least in the airplane I'm flying) it can take on some ugly characteritics if you get slow with full flaps, so I've been taught to delay full flaps until the runway is made. I envy your ownership of one of these birds...Enjoy it! In article , Peter R. wrote: good post snipped |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:42:22 -0500, Tom Fleischman
wrote: Peter, Congratulations! I have recently transitioned into an S35 with a 300HP IO-550 . What an airplane! These airplanes are real movers, are very slippery, and descents have to be planned well in advance. It's very easy to get to VNE quickly when you nose it over. In the airplane I'm flying I've found that once I get down to TPA or level outside the FAF, 18" and 2400RPM gets me I typically fly the approaches at 120MPH. down to 140kts pretty quickly if altitude is held. Once the gear and 10 degrees of flaps are out it flys like a Cherokee and is easy to land. Except for the fuel consumption and the Cherokee is known for it's docile handeling. :-)) OTOH the Bo is probably one of the easiest planes to land that's out there. (once you get used to the interconnected controls) I've been told that (at least in the airplane I'm flying) it can take on some ugly characteritics if you get slow with full flaps, so I've been taught to delay full flaps until the runway is made. When light they have an almost unbelievably slow stall (mine with me and half fuel is 55 MPH). Fly the book figures and they are quite predictable. Stall it and it'll show you just how unforgiving it can become. When light I typically fly the later part of final around 75 MPH. The same is true for balked landing with every thing hanging out. Instructors who are used to primary students may tend to forget that you do not jam the throttle in, but ease in the power. If you are in the round out, or about to flare and jam in the throttle, it's likely to come right around sideways. Yet the difference is only a half second to a full second to ease in the throttle. Do this with an instructor who is thoroughly familiar with the Bonanzas. Take it up to altitude, and try the equivalent of a balked landing. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com I envy your ownership of one of these birds...Enjoy it! In article , Peter R. wrote: good post snipped |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Okay, a couple more comments in addition to the excellent postings
already made... - Weight and Balance. The Bonanza, because of it's leading edge fuel tanks, develops and aft cg as fuel is burned. ALWAYS calculate a takeoff and a LANDING cg. You may takeoff within range, but depending on your leg length, the fuel burn will move the cg aft of the rear limit. - Emergency gear extension. This is where you want a good autopilot or someone in the right seat to fly the airplane while you put your seat all the way back and see just what it feels like to hand crank the gear down. (50 turns on that little handle.) - Go to Avweb and download all John Deakin's columns on flying complex airplanes and leaning. Closing comments. The Bonanza is a sturdy, well built airplane. Its clean aerodynamics will bite you if you don't pay attention. Learn to slow down gradually, don't come blasting into the pattern at cruise speed and yank the power off. Have your descents and approaches planned by the time you are 50 miles from your destination so you can implement them in a planned fashion (reduce 1 inch mp per minute so that you are at landing power on downwind). |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congrats on getting yourself into a Bo, they are indeed fine airplanes.
I transitioned to mine from cherokees and skyhawks, and there were 2 things that really took some getting used to, besides the speed and comfort!! The first is that nose-up tendency when changing from high power climb to cruise. You need to anticipate the slightly nose down attitude and prepare to trim aggresively, and it seems like you've already 'got it'. The second is that the slipperiness (word?) can get you into trouble if the autopilot is not engaged and you take your hands off the yoke. I was VFR and flew into some soup and needed a popup IFR clearance. While copying the route I dropped my clipboard, and in the few seconds it took to recover it, the plane went into a 30 degree, 800fpm descent!! Yikes!! Now I make sure the AP is on if I intend to do any significant heads-down time. Even now, after several hundred hours, I still can't get over how docile and easy she is to handle once the gear and flaps go down. Get the airspeed right over the fence and it's easy to land and uses very little runway to boot. Welcome to the Bo club, enjoy your new bird. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Congrats to you.
I just received my high performance endorsement today. I bought into a Cessna 206 about three weeks ago. I don't have the retracts, but the extra hp, cowl flaps, constant speed prop, and just plane much bigger plane have taken a lot to get use to. Actually, I'm still not use to it, but, this is just the license to learn and get better. All the best, and remember... If you don't like it, go around! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 07:17 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |