Baby Bush will be Closing Airports in California to VFR Flight Again

If Harry Truman could say "I'll tell you something else: that Richard Nixon is a
lying sonofabitch" what have you got to complain about? Free speech can be
offensive without being either indecent or obscene. If you can't handle that
concept, then *you* have something to get over.

Dave Reinhart


C J Campbell wrote:

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

To what is it specifically, that you object?

Referring to the President of the United States as "Baby Bush" is extremely
offensive to many people. There is no reason to do it. Introducing such
derogatory terms has nothing to do with the purpose of the news group. It is
even more offensive for you to think that everybody is so stupid as to not
see what you are doing.

"David Reinhart" wrote in message
...
If Harry Truman could say "I'll tell you something else: that Richard
Nixon is a
lying sonofabitch" what have you got to complain about? Free speech can
be
offensive without being either indecent or obscene. If you can't handle
that
concept, then *you* have something to get over.

Well, maybe you could learn to handle concepts correctly; then you'd have
nothing to get over.

C J Campbell wrote:

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

To what is it specifically, that you object?

Referring to the President of the United States as "Baby Bush" is
extremely
offensive to many people. There is no reason to do it. Introducing such
derogatory terms has nothing to do with the purpose of the news group.
It is
even more offensive for you to think that everybody is so stupid as to
not
see what you are doing.

Larry Dighera wrote:

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:19:33 -0600, CriticalMass wrote
in Message-Id: :

Larry,

For pete's sake (and all the rest of our sakes), give "Baby Bush" a rest
- HERE.

I wasn't aware that you had been elected spokesman for ALL of
rec.aviation.piloting. :-)

You've well established your anti-Bush political bias in this ng, and,
I imagine, in as many other places as you can. I'm tired of it.

Perhaps YOU would like to take _responsibility_ for the content of
this newsgroup to which YOU are exposed, and filter out all the
phrases and authors YOU find unpalatable. Or are you really just
looking for an excuse to attack me publicly.

I bet some others are, too. We don't come to this ng to hear about your hate
for "Baby Bush".

The only time the word 'hate' has been used in this thread (until now)
is by you. You can characterize my article as hateful if that is how
you perceive it, but the fact is, it's merely FACTUAL. The hate you
perceive is yours; please don't project it onto me.

Perhaps it is baby Bush's audacious airspace grabs that are TRULY
hateful in their arrogant disregard for those he serves.

If you think Bush is bad, just you wait until you're introduced to John F Kerry
this summer. His block has already been tossed into disarray because of his
security, and he's not even President. But then again, what do you expect from
somone who actually had the fire hydrant moved in front of his house. John F
Kerry. A real man of the people. His Massachusetts democrat buddies Marty
Meehan and Ed Markey are already working on federal proposals to severely restrict
general aviation, all under the guise of "security." You can bet with every last
bottle of red (and green) ketchup that they will find a sympathetic ear in a Kerry
White House.

On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:19:33 -0600, CriticalMass wrote:

Larry,

For pete's sake (and all the rest of our sakes), give "Baby Bush" a rest
- HERE.

snip

CM,

Never try to teach a pig to sing.
It's a waste of your time, and it tends to **** off the pig.

TC

This post would have been made by the same Baby Larry that complains about
off-topic posts, eh?