A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Circular Runway



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 1st 04, 02:44 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



jsmith wrote:

The theory posited in the article was that one could always land and
takeoff into the wind using a circular runway.


Well, at some point in your takeoff or landing you could be in line with the wind and
the runway at the same time, but at other points, you'd have to deal with a crosswind
component. Furthermore, that component would be changing as you rolled along.

The banked track would counter the crosswind component.


No, it would counter the tendency of the aircraft to travel in a straight line. If
the track were not banked, you'd run off the track before you got airborne.

George Patterson
Treason is ne'er successful, Sir; what then be the reason? Why, if treason
be successful, Sir, then none dare call it treason.
  #2  
Old April 1st 04, 12:01 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:47:02 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote:

I don't think that's what he's talking about.


Oh, I knew that, Peter. Just wanted to parade my arcane knowledge


all the best -- Dan Ford
email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line!

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #3  
Old April 1st 04, 12:04 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Perhaps this was an April Fool's joke that Air & Space Magazine played on
its readers?


I haven't seen the magazine yet, but in my experience George Larson
takes aviation very seriously.

Well -- there was the cover with the dog flying the plane.

And the big feature about the world's ugliest aircraft...

Come to think of it, perhaps it is an April Fool edition. My
contribution is a "Soundings" about the XC-99 cargo plane finding a
new home at Wright-Patt.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line!

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #4  
Old April 1st 04, 01:59 AM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote in Message-Id:
:

Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time.
You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft
landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from.


Lindbergh Field in San Diego was the same in the early days.
  #5  
Old April 1st 04, 05:40 AM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote in Message-Id:
:

Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time.
You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft
landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from.


Lindbergh Field in San Diego was the same in the early days.


All early airfields were built that way.


  #6  
Old April 1st 04, 10:14 PM
Malcolm Teas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cub Driver wrote in message . ..
Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time.
You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft
landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from.

Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the
Americans arrived toward the end of 1941.


See: http://members.tripod.com/airfields_...ds_FL_JaxN.htm,
and search for "VQQ". This will show Cecil Field NAS in Jax in a WWII
aerial photo. The original circular landing area still shows.

It's a cool website in any case.

-Malcolm Teas
  #7  
Old April 5th 04, 03:11 AM
Big John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

CD

Many years ago (1920-1930) in a land far away. Bar stories told about
aircraft operating in SA. They would land in a jungle clearing and
when ready forTO would put a stake in the center of the clearing and
tie a rope to it. They then ran the rope out to bird and looped it
around the strut (or something). Pilot held the end of the rope so it
wouldn't come loose and started to accelerate in a circle.
As he got enough speed to lift off he would let go the rope and fly
away.

If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar.

This not a one April story.

Anyone else heard this story and can confirm it????

Big John
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:


Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time.
You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft
landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from.

Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the
Americans arrived toward the end of 1941.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line!

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com


  #8  
Old April 5th 04, 11:08 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar


Sounds like DC Comics to me!

Not Scorchy Smith or Smilin' Jack, though. They were too realistic.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org
  #9  
Old April 5th 04, 02:41 PM
William W. Plummer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Seaplane drivers can accelerate in a circle in order to get out of a small
lake. No rope to a central point is used.

Circular airfields were built to accomodate airships and blimps.
Lakehurst, NJ, where the Hindenberg disaster occured, still has a circular
field. You can see it from normal scheduled airliners traveling from DCA
to BOS as you approach the JFK VOR if you are sitting on the right of the
plane next to a window.



"Big John" wrote in message
news
CD

Many years ago (1920-1930) in a land far away. Bar stories told about
aircraft operating in SA. They would land in a jungle clearing and
when ready forTO would put a stake in the center of the clearing and
tie a rope to it. They then ran the rope out to bird and looped it
around the strut (or something). Pilot held the end of the rope so it
wouldn't come loose and started to accelerate in a circle.
As he got enough speed to lift off he would let go the rope and fly
away.

If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar.

This not a one April story.

Anyone else heard this story and can confirm it????

Big John
`````````````````````````````````````````````````` ``````````````

On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote:


Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time.
You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft
landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from.

Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the
Americans arrived toward the end of 1941.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line!

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com




  #10  
Old April 5th 04, 04:08 PM
Kyler Laird
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"William W. Plummer" writes:

Circular airfields were built to accomodate airships and blimps.
Lakehurst, NJ, where the Hindenberg disaster occured, still has a circular
field. You can see it from normal scheduled airliners traveling from DCA
to BOS as you approach the JFK VOR if you are sitting on the right of the
plane next to a window.


For those of us who avoid the "airline experience"...
http://mapper.acme.com/?lat=40.03651...ht=2&do t=Yes
Is that it?

--kyler
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Owning 114 July 22nd 04 05:40 PM
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters John Cook Military Aviation 193 April 11th 04 03:33 AM
Rwy incursions Hankal Piloting 10 November 16th 03 02:33 AM
Moving violation..NASA form? Nasir Piloting 47 November 5th 03 07:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.