![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jsmith wrote: The theory posited in the article was that one could always land and takeoff into the wind using a circular runway. Well, at some point in your takeoff or landing you could be in line with the wind and the runway at the same time, but at other points, you'd have to deal with a crosswind component. Furthermore, that component would be changing as you rolled along. The banked track would counter the crosswind component. No, it would counter the tendency of the aircraft to travel in a straight line. If the track were not banked, you'd run off the track before you got airborne. George Patterson Treason is ne'er successful, Sir; what then be the reason? Why, if treason be successful, Sir, then none dare call it treason. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:47:02 -0800, "Peter Duniho"
wrote: I don't think that's what he's talking about. Oh, I knew that, Peter. Just wanted to parade my arcane knowledge ![]() all the best -- Dan Ford email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line! see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Perhaps this was an April Fool's joke that Air & Space Magazine played on its readers? I haven't seen the magazine yet, but in my experience George Larson takes aviation very seriously. Well -- there was the cover with the dog flying the plane. And the big feature about the world's ugliest aircraft... Come to think of it, perhaps it is an April Fool edition. My contribution is a "Soundings" about the XC-99 cargo plane finding a new home at Wright-Patt. all the best -- Dan Ford email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line! see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver
wrote in Message-Id: : Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time. You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from. Lindbergh Field in San Diego was the same in the early days. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver wrote in Message-Id: : Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time. You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from. Lindbergh Field in San Diego was the same in the early days. All early airfields were built that way. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cub Driver wrote in message . ..
Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time. You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from. Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the Americans arrived toward the end of 1941. See: http://members.tripod.com/airfields_...ds_FL_JaxN.htm, and search for "VQQ". This will show Cecil Field NAS in Jax in a WWII aerial photo. The original circular landing area still shows. It's a cool website in any case. -Malcolm Teas |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
CD
Many years ago (1920-1930) in a land far away. Bar stories told about aircraft operating in SA. They would land in a jungle clearing and when ready forTO would put a stake in the center of the clearing and tie a rope to it. They then ran the rope out to bird and looped it around the strut (or something). Pilot held the end of the rope so it wouldn't come loose and started to accelerate in a circle. As he got enough speed to lift off he would let go the rope and fly away. If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar. This not a one April story. Anyone else heard this story and can confirm it???? Big John `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````` On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver wrote: Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time. You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from. Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the Americans arrived toward the end of 1941. all the best -- Dan Ford email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line! see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar Sounds like DC Comics to me! Not Scorchy Smith or Smilin' Jack, though. They were too realistic. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! blog www.vivabush.org |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seaplane drivers can accelerate in a circle in order to get out of a small
lake. No rope to a central point is used. Circular airfields were built to accomodate airships and blimps. Lakehurst, NJ, where the Hindenberg disaster occured, still has a circular field. You can see it from normal scheduled airliners traveling from DCA to BOS as you approach the JFK VOR if you are sitting on the right of the plane next to a window. "Big John" wrote in message news ![]() CD Many years ago (1920-1930) in a land far away. Bar stories told about aircraft operating in SA. They would land in a jungle clearing and when ready forTO would put a stake in the center of the clearing and tie a rope to it. They then ran the rope out to bird and looped it around the strut (or something). Pilot held the end of the rope so it wouldn't come loose and started to accelerate in a circle. As he got enough speed to lift off he would let go the rope and fly away. If not a true story made a good one to tell at the bar. This not a one April story. Anyone else heard this story and can confirm it???? Big John `````````````````````````````````````````````````` `````````````` On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:18:52 -0500, Cub Driver wrote: Circular (or at least 360-degree) airfields were common at one time. You put a stake in the center with a windsock on top. The aircraft landing simply landed into the wind, wherever it was coming from. Wu Chia Ba airport in Kunming used this arrangement before the Americans arrived toward the end of 1941. all the best -- Dan Ford email: -- put Cubdriver in subject line! see the Warbird's Forum at www.warbirdforum.com and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"William W. Plummer" writes:
Circular airfields were built to accomodate airships and blimps. Lakehurst, NJ, where the Hindenberg disaster occured, still has a circular field. You can see it from normal scheduled airliners traveling from DCA to BOS as you approach the JFK VOR if you are sitting on the right of the plane next to a window. For those of us who avoid the "airline experience"... http://mapper.acme.com/?lat=40.03651...ht=2&do t=Yes Is that it? --kyler |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Owning | 114 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
F15E's trounced by Eurofighters | John Cook | Military Aviation | 193 | April 11th 04 03:33 AM |
Rwy incursions | Hankal | Piloting | 10 | November 16th 03 02:33 AM |
Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 07:56 PM |