![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... Do your energy companies have to abide by more and more, or less and less environmental regulation? Is it easier or harder to drill now than it was back 30 or so years ago? These don't seem like useful comparisons. Many environmental regulations came about because of eggregious pollution cases so some of the regulation is due to their own irresponsibility in the past. I do not believe the present corporate quarterly-results-driven culture would do much better. Also, the push to enact legislation limiting their liability makes it look like they want the profits without the responsibility. There is virtually no industry which is not more regulated than it was in the past. This is a fact of life in virtually every country. You can spend your life complaining about and fighting it or you can adapt and deal with it. It is left as an exercise to the reader as to which one will work out better for you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message ink.net... "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... I agree that refining capacity has been impacted by various enviornmental regs. These haven't affected drilling (and hence production) much though. Environmental regs haven't affected drilling? Are you kidding? Let's see...where have I been. I was an energy analyst for about a decade and since then I have made a reasonable living investing in energy companies. Where have you been? Listening to AM radio? I don't get a good AM signal here. Do your energy companies have to abide by more and more, or less and less environmental regulation? Is it easier or harder to drill now than it was back 30 or so years ago? That isn't the point. The point is whether or not enviornmental restrictions have had a meaningful effect on depressing drilling activity. Obviously they have had some effect. The main depressent on drilling has been the need to go deeper and deeper to find less and less. Ask your energy companies how mush they do new drilling now than they did in years past. See above. Budgets are up across the industry due to better pricing but drilling will never reach the levels of 40 yrs ago simply due to the fact that the resource has been largely exploited in the US. Are you always so goddamn pompous? Only when I am dealing with a jackass who considers himself an expert of everything.without knowing anything about the subjects he pontificates on. Face the facts, you have absolutely no idea what the cost or effect of eviornmental regulations is on O&G drilling. Industrywide they are a rounding error. Mike MU-2 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... The source you asked for: http://smartmoney.com/aheadofthecurv...story=20040521 BTW, he's doing a correction that the "Quadrillion" BTU's should have been "Billion". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Luskin is just talking his book. A lot of what's in the article is
distorted half truths like the reserve information. Mike MU-2 "Tom Sixkiller" wrote in message ... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message nk.net... The source you asked for: http://smartmoney.com/aheadofthecurv...story=20040521 BTW, he's doing a correction that the "Quadrillion" BTU's should have been "Billion". |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This doesn't sound right. Are you saying the "EPA and others," meaning government regulation, reduced the oil well reserves? I was there at the scene of the crime. There are really two 'shortages' in domestic production. One is the shortfall in refinery capacity. We haven't built a new refinery in the US for 15 years, and that is entirely because of EPA regs and NIMBY protests disguised as environmental concern. But the shortfall in recovering domestic reserves is more complicated. Enviromentalism is part of it, but there are economic reasons as well. In the 70's and into the early 80's, we had a lot of domestic capability, and the JR Ewings of the country saved our butts during the embargo. Unfortunately for them, they made a lot of money doing it, so we destroyed them. First was the "Windfall Profits Tax". Oil exploration has always been boom and bust. Wildcatters made alot of money during the booms and invested in new equipment and grew their companies during those times. During the lean years, the capital reserves sustained them to the next boom. So, Nixon and Ford, seeing the boom during the embargo years, called those profits obscene and confiscated them with the "Windfall Profits Tax." Carter continued the price controls Nixon started, then dropped them on everything EXCEPT petroleum and health care, bleeding the Ewings with skyrocketing costs and controled prices for their products. Then he finished off the domestic oil industry with the Fuel Use Act, which attempted to force gas producers to sell their gas to homeowners in the NorthEast at prices that did not justify the pipeline capacity needed to get it there, by not letting them sell the gas to industry in the South were they could make a profit at the controlled prices. So, all our JR Ewings went bankrupt. Hundreds of billions of dollars worth of equipment rusted away or was sold for scrap. The Arabs put the final nail in the coffin by boosting production so the price feel for a while to 11 or 12 dollars a barrel. Now, all the wildcatters who know how to get the oil have huge bankruptcies in the resume and can't raise the money for new equipment. Further, the banks know that the Arabs can drop the price any time they want to drive domestic producers broke if they become a threat to their monopoly. So the banks arent' going to finance domestic production so long as th Arabs can manipulate the market to destroy their competitors. The field is left to a few multinationals. And we're screwed. Government meddling in the free market did it, but it was alot more complicated than the EPA alone. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eeeek. What a mess.
"We're from Washington, and we're here to help you..." "Wdtabor" wrote in message ... This doesn't sound right. Are you saying the "EPA and others," meaning government regulation, reduced the oil well reserves? I was there at the scene of the crime. There are really two 'shortages' in domestic production. One is the shortfall in refinery capacity. We haven't built a new refinery in the US for 15 years, and that is entirely because of EPA regs and NIMBY protests disguised as environmental concern. But the shortfall in recovering domestic reserves is more complicated. Enviromentalism is part of it, but there are economic reasons as well. In the 70's and into the early 80's, we had a lot of domestic capability, and the JR Ewings of the country saved our butts during the embargo. Unfortunately for them, they made a lot of money doing it, so we destroyed them. First was the "Windfall Profits Tax". Oil exploration has always been boom and bust. Wildcatters made alot of money during the booms and invested in new equipment and grew their companies during those times. During the lean years, the capital reserves sustained them to the next boom. So, Nixon and Ford, seeing the boom during the embargo years, called those profits obscene and confiscated them with the "Windfall Profits Tax." Carter continued the price controls Nixon started, then dropped them on everything EXCEPT petroleum and health care, bleeding the Ewings with skyrocketing costs and controled prices for their products. Then he finished off the domestic oil industry with the Fuel Use Act, which attempted to force gas producers to sell their gas to homeowners in the NorthEast at prices that did not justify the pipeline capacity needed to get it there, by not letting them sell the gas to industry in the South were they could make a profit at the controlled prices. So, all our JR Ewings went bankrupt. Hundreds of billions of dollars worth of equipment rusted away or was sold for scrap. The Arabs put the final nail in the coffin by boosting production so the price feel for a while to 11 or 12 dollars a barrel. Now, all the wildcatters who know how to get the oil have huge bankruptcies in the resume and can't raise the money for new equipment. Further, the banks know that the Arabs can drop the price any time they want to drive domestic producers broke if they become a threat to their monopoly. So the banks arent' going to finance domestic production so long as th Arabs can manipulate the market to destroy their competitors. The field is left to a few multinationals. And we're screwed. Government meddling in the free market did it, but it was alot more complicated than the EPA alone. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Floridians Are Hit With Price Gouging | X98 | Military Aviation | 0 | August 18th 04 04:07 PM |
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup | TripodBill | Home Built | 17 | August 4th 04 10:42 AM |
Garmin Price Fixing Post from other newsgroup | TripodBill | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | July 16th 04 04:50 PM |
Headsets: "Minimum Advertised Price" | Will Thompson | Piloting | 21 | April 10th 04 11:22 AM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |