![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 08:12:39 -0700, NW_PILOT wrote:
what if they took a shot and missed what goes up must come down ware is all that explosive going to go over a populated area how about the shrapnel from the poor Cessna that get blow to smithereens. collateral damage ... but you know all them people taking them pansy pills probably think it would be fireworks until shrapnel started killing people. I could see the headline eehhh ... that's ok ... it'S for the fight against terrorism. don't you agree? you _have_ to agree. no? are you a terrorist? #m -- Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me? 'HECTOP' in rec.aviation.piloting |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Teacherjh wrote: Yes. I can imagine the newsgroups full of posts complaining about that idiot pilot and the harm he did to general aviation. I can see the administration feeding the press the story that this was a huge threat and pumping up what terrorist damage a small airplane can do, and that there was no time to consider alternatives (like the cops who shoot somebody who brandishes a toy gun). I can see this as JUSTIFYING huge TFRs around events, with multple rings and multple escalations of force for intrusions. I think you're exactly correct. In fact, I'd bet there are people in the TSA who are drooling over the opportunity to do exactly that. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Teacherjh wrote: Yes. I can imagine the newsgroups full of posts complaining about that idiot pilot and the harm he did to general aviation. I can see the administration feeding the press the story that this was a huge threat and pumping up what terrorist damage a small airplane can do, and that there was no time to consider alternatives (like the cops who shoot somebody who brandishes a toy gun). I can see this as JUSTIFYING huge TFRs around events, with multple rings and multple escalations of force for intrusions. I think you're exactly correct. In fact, I'd bet there are people in the TSA who are drooling over the opportunity to do exactly that. There are rumblings in Washington that the TSA is no longer needed and should be done away with. The thought is to return airport security to the private sector. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Teacherjh" wrote in message Yes. I can imagine the newsgroups full of posts complaining about that idiot pilot and the harm he did to general aviation. Didn't some kid in Florida fly a Cessna into a building awhile back? That passed and the media flavor was more one of "what a dumbass." -c |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vigo wrote:
lol can you imagine the public backlash if an f15 blasted someone's c150 out of the sky. I think this is an election year for you guys, so have no fear I can't see them shooting anyone down. This sounds like every day life in and around the Wasington ADIZ. They don't blast you out of the sky (ADIZ), but they do force you to land. --- Jay -- __!__ Jay and Teresa Masino ___(_)___ http://www2.ari.net/jmasino ! ! ! http://www.oceancityairport.com http://www.oc-adolfos.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Masino wrote:
This sounds like every day life in and around the Wasington ADIZ. They don't blast you out of the sky (ADIZ), but they do force you to land. Maybe "force" isn't the right word. They don't force pilots to land any more than a cop forces you to pull over by turning on his lights. However, the *implied* threat of force makes the non-terrorists follow instructions. ![]() -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://pocketgear.com/products_searc...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Vigo wrote: lol can you imagine the public backlash if an f15 blasted someone's c150 out of the sky. I think this is an election year for you guys, so have no fear I can't see them shooting anyone down. They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at, say, 400 knots, hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart attack, and if the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts flying a loose formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do absolutely anything that fighter pilot wants him to do. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
lol no doubt I like that one.
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Vigo wrote: lol can you imagine the public backlash if an f15 blasted someone's c150 out of the sky. I think this is an election year for you guys, so have no fear I can't see them shooting anyone down. They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at, say, 400 knots, hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart attack, and if the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts flying a loose formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do absolutely anything that fighter pilot wants him to do. George Patterson None of us is as dumb as all of us. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at, say, 400 knots, hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart attack, and if the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts flying a loose formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do absolutely anything that fighter pilot wants him to do. Was a website some years ago by two guys who tried to see how close to Groom Lake they could get in a Cessna without actually violating airspace. Had photos. They were buzzed somewhat as you described. : The other interesting photo was the transponder bulb. It was pegged solid. He claims they were lit up so hard that it damaged the xpdr, but I don't see how that's possible unless the bulb just overheated or something. -c |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.serve.com/mahood/nellis/flight.htm
"gatt" wrote in message ... "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at, say, 400 knots, hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart attack, and if the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts flying a loose formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do absolutely anything that fighter pilot wants him to do. Was a website some years ago by two guys who tried to see how close to Groom Lake they could get in a Cessna without actually violating airspace. Had photos. They were buzzed somewhat as you described. : The other interesting photo was the transponder bulb. It was pegged solid. He claims they were lit up so hard that it damaged the xpdr, but I don't see how that's possible unless the bulb just overheated or something. -c |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ISRAELI LINK IN US TORTURE TECHNIQUES | MORRIS434 | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 12th 04 05:14 AM |
ISRAELI LINK IN US TORTURE TECHNIQUES | MORRIS434 | Military Aviation | 0 | May 12th 04 05:13 AM |
27 Apr 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 27th 04 11:54 PM |
TSA's General Aviation Airport Security Recommendations Might Become Requirements | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 1 | February 25th 04 05:11 PM |
another "either you are with us ..." story | Jeff Franks | Piloting | 2 | December 31st 03 12:04 AM |