A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New security bulletin



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 8th 04, 08:01 PM
Vigo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

lol no doubt I like that one.
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Vigo wrote:

lol can you imagine the public backlash if an f15 blasted someone's c150

out
of the sky. I think this is an election year for you guys, so have no

fear I
can't see them shooting anyone down.


They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at, say,

400 knots,
hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart

attack, and if
the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts flying

a loose
formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do absolutely

anything
that fighter pilot wants him to do.

George Patterson
None of us is as dumb as all of us.



  #2  
Old June 8th 04, 08:28 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message

They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at, say,

400 knots,
hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart

attack, and if
the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts flying

a loose
formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do absolutely

anything
that fighter pilot wants him to do.


Was a website some years ago by two guys who tried to see how close to Groom
Lake they could get in a Cessna without actually violating airspace. Had
photos. They were buzzed somewhat as you described. :

The other interesting photo was the transponder bulb. It was pegged solid.
He claims they were lit up so hard that it damaged the xpdr, but I don't see
how that's possible unless the bulb just overheated or something.

-c


  #3  
Old June 9th 04, 04:16 PM
Ryan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://www.serve.com/mahood/nellis/flight.htm

"gatt" wrote in message
...

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message

They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at,

say,
400 knots,
hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart

attack, and if
the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts

flying
a loose
formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do

absolutely
anything
that fighter pilot wants him to do.


Was a website some years ago by two guys who tried to see how close to

Groom
Lake they could get in a Cessna without actually violating airspace. Had
photos. They were buzzed somewhat as you described. :

The other interesting photo was the transponder bulb. It was pegged

solid.
He claims they were lit up so hard that it damaged the xpdr, but I don't

see
how that's possible unless the bulb just overheated or something.

-c




  #4  
Old June 9th 04, 10:33 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Excellent, Ryan. That's the one. Haven't read it for awhile.

"Ryan" f wrote in message ...
http://www.serve.com/mahood/nellis/flight.htm

"gatt" wrote in message
...

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message

They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at,

say,
400 knots,
hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart

attack, and if
the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts

flying
a loose
formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do

absolutely
anything
that fighter pilot wants him to do.


Was a website some years ago by two guys who tried to see how close to

Groom
Lake they could get in a Cessna without actually violating airspace.

Had
photos. They were buzzed somewhat as you described. :

The other interesting photo was the transponder bulb. It was pegged

solid.
He claims they were lit up so hard that it damaged the xpdr, but I don't

see
how that's possible unless the bulb just overheated or something.

-c






  #5  
Old June 9th 04, 01:14 AM
Tom Sixkiller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Vigo wrote:

lol can you imagine the public backlash if an f15 blasted someone's c150

out
of the sky. I think this is an election year for you guys, so have no

fear I
can't see them shooting anyone down.


They wouldn't have to shoot it down. Just fly about 100' under it at, say,

400 knots,
hit the burners and head straight up. If the guy doesn't have a heart

attack, and if
the wake turbulence doesn't turn the 150 into a collection of parts flying

a loose
formation, I'd bet junior birdman there would be willing to do absolutely

anything
that fighter pilot wants him to do.


Yeah...that'd work! Why didn't I think of that? :~)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ISRAELI LINK IN US TORTURE TECHNIQUES MORRIS434 Naval Aviation 0 May 12th 04 05:14 AM
ISRAELI LINK IN US TORTURE TECHNIQUES MORRIS434 Military Aviation 0 May 12th 04 05:13 AM
27 Apr 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 April 27th 04 11:54 PM
TSA's General Aviation Airport Security Recommendations Might Become Requirements Larry Dighera Piloting 1 February 25th 04 05:11 PM
another "either you are with us ..." story Jeff Franks Piloting 2 December 31st 03 12:04 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.