If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Scott-
I really don't care if you look or not............it's your lost at this price. I am not hiding anything, I bought the plane like this and it will be sold AS-IS. And if you can't catch things that are missed or the builder is unaware of on an experimental/homebuilt then you should buy a GA aircraft. And further more for the record in the listing"The Ad states the plane needs an Annual Conditional Inspection", So if the A&P who signs off the plane deems something is necessary you will know..............the ad goes on further to say it needs registered which means an FAA official would have to look over the plane. So, Scott-I don't think I'll lose any sleep by you not looking at the A/P. Later, JR "plasticguy" wrote in message ... "JR" wrote in message om... Nothing else was skiped, as you would like to have others believe- The plane as documented in its logs flew hundreds of hours with out jury struts. You are trying to make a big deal over nothing. When in reality there isn't much involved,drilling an extra hole in the strut and having a tube welded in,cutting a piece of aluminum angle to shape, drilling a few holes and cutting a piece of streamline tube. The drawback is a little more drag but the extra strength in the strut offsets that. One does have to ask the question, WHY. Why don't you install them if the designer says they are needed, and you acknowlege that it is no big deal?? It seems to me that you are not a believer in "full disclosure". I personally thought the a/p was worth a look, but my perception of your willingness to hide things dictates I pass on it. Your loss for not being forthcoming with all the facts......................... Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|