![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Duniho" wrote: Well, we'd only climbed a few hundred feet when something in the airplane started making a very strange noise. Sorry, Pete; you fly a ...? It might have been my imagination, but it seemed like whenever I heard the sound, there was a little deceleration from the airplane. Did you happen to look at the tach or MAP during any of these events? But somehow, it still seems like the right thing to have done. No question. But even if the source of the noise turns out to be something entirely benign, Here's hoping it's not one of those intermittent, "mystery" problems and your mechanic spots it right away. Keep us posted. -- Dan C172RG at BFM |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dan Luke" wrote in message
... Sorry, Pete; you fly a ...? Lake Renegade (turbocharged model). Did you happen to look at the tach or MAP during any of these events? No. Of course, in hindsight that might have provided useful information. But even when the takeoff is going smoothly, I'm a "eyes outside" kind of person (once the proper reading of the gauges has been confirmed during the takeoff roll, of course). In this particular situation, my mind was focused on where on the water would be acceptable for a landing (though, frankly, the Tacoma Narrows are not generally amenable to seaplane landings in any case, due to strong currents through there), and on a possible landing back at TIW. Maybe I could have had my front-seat passenger watch the gauges, to try to correlate them with the noise. But I personally didn't have the attention to spare. I would have either have had to keep my eyes on the engine gauges until the noise occurred, or I would have had to hope to be able to shift my attention quickly enough to evaluate the gauges in the short period during which the sound occurred. Neither would have been practical to do, IMHO. It's a pretty good argument for a data-recording engine monitor. I'llhave to think about getting one of those. Pete |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... Sorry, Pete; you fly a ...? Lake Renegade (turbocharged model). Now I'm envious Pete.... :-) Rest assured, it was a good call. As a student I aborted a takeoff due to a couple of bangs on rotation and nearly went into the grass. Turned out to be the pax seat belt hanging out the door. The only things damaged were my ego and my rearend from the chewing I got from my CFI. Hope you find the culprit and the fix isn't a bank breaker. Marty |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
As a student I aborted a takeoff due to a couple of bangs on rotation and
nearly went into the grass. Turned out to be the pax seat belt hanging out the door. The only things damaged were my ego and my rearend from the chewing I got from my CFI. Had something like that happen... my instructor forgot to tell me that 150's sometimes get a violent nosewheel shimmy during the takeoff roll... well, I found that out for myself on my first solo... pushed the power up, and a few seconds later the whole plane started shaking... aborted the takeoff thinking it was going to come apart on me. Course, he just tells me to keep the weight off the nose, so my three flights were done soft-field style with the nose up as soon as it would go. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "Dan Luke" wrote in message ... Sorry, Pete; you fly a ...? Lake Renegade (turbocharged model). Did you happen to look at the tach or MAP during any of these events? No. Of course, in hindsight that might have provided useful information. But even when the takeoff is going smoothly, I'm a "eyes outside" kind of person (once the proper reading of the gauges has been confirmed during the takeoff roll, of course). In this particular situation, my mind was focused on where on the water would be acceptable for a landing (though, frankly, the Tacoma Narrows are not generally amenable to seaplane landings in any case, due to strong currents through there), and on a possible landing back at TIW. Maybe I could have had my front-seat passenger watch the gauges, to try to correlate them with the noise. But I personally didn't have the attention to spare. I would have either have had to keep my eyes on the engine gauges until the noise occurred, or I would have had to hope to be able to shift my attention quickly enough to evaluate the gauges in the short period during which the sound occurred. Neither would have been practical to do, IMHO. It's a pretty good argument for a data-recording engine monitor. I'llhave to think about getting one of those. Pete Any idea of what your passengers were doing at the time. In my airplane (an RV-6) there is a noticable change in the tone and volume of cockpit noise (and vibration) either the pilot or passenger shifts his/her feet on the floor. I know when I move my feet, so it doesn't surprise me, but when I've got a "shifty" passenger, s/he will put me on edge for a few seconds here and there. Getting back to your situation, is it possible that a passenger found a neat way to rest a hand/arm/foot/etc. that created an unusual resonance? I realize this wouldn't have caused a power loss. One other thing to consider is a stuck valve. Your description sounds similar to my understanding of the symptoms of a stuck valve. KB |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message
... Any idea of what your passengers were doing at the time. In my airplane (an RV-6) there is a noticable change in the tone and volume of cockpit noise (and vibration) either the pilot or passenger shifts his/her feet on the floor. No, no idea. But I've never experienced anything like that before, and I have often flown with passengers over the years. The one "passenger-induced emergency" in my airplane I'm aware of is that the front seat passenger can actually push on the yoke lever with their feet. Oddly enough, the one passenger to show this to me (unintentionally, of course) was the same one that a few years earlier kept messing with my elevator trim on a nighttime flight, by repeatedly alternating the position of his seat back (it was a clear night, he was in the back seat in a 182RG, and he kept lowering the seat back so that he could look at the stars, and then raising it again to look out the side and front). One other thing to consider is a stuck valve. Your description sounds similar to my understanding of the symptoms of a stuck valve. Unfortunately, that's the best conclusion I've been able to come to as well. I've never experienced a stuck valve with this engine, so I don't know what sort of power loss to expect. I'd *think* it'd be more significant than what I noticed, but I don't really know. The engine just got all new exhaust valves and guides a few years ago, so if it's an exhaust valve problem, I'll be sorely disappointed. I suppose it could be an intake valve problem, even though they don't get the kind of wear and tear the exhaust valves do. Pete |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... much snipped The one "passenger-induced emergency" in my airplane I'm aware of is that the front seat passenger can actually push on the yoke lever with their feet. Oddly enough, the one passenger to show this to me (unintentionally, of course) was the same one that a few years earlier kept messing with my elevator trim on a nighttime flight, by repeatedly alternating the position of his seat back (it was a clear night, he was in the back seat in a 182RG, and he kept lowering the seat back so that he could look at the stars, and then raising it again to look out the side and front). Pete Hijacking the thread here, but... We had a fatal accident in an Ercoupe in the local area last year that possibly/probably involved accidental control manipulation by the passenger. Apparently, the aircraft ran out of fuel and the pilot had lined up for a landing in a field. Most likely survivable, possibly even a field he could have flown out of after adding fuel. However, the airplane went in almost vertical at the "approach end" of the field. Speculation is/was that the passenger used his feet to brace himself for the off-field landing and unknowingly used the elevator control linkages in the footwell as a place to brace. The harder he braced, the more the airplane pitched nose down... Right into the ground. Two fatalities in an accident that shouldn't have even resulted in injuries. KB |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:39:51 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote in Message-Id: : I've never experienced a stuck valve with this engine, so I don't know what sort of power loss to expect. It's not only a specific engine that characterizes the nature of a stuck valve. The magnitude of the effect of a stuck valve can vary depending the position in which the valve sticks. If it sticks wide open, it could contact the piston possibly with catastrophic results. If it just sticks open a smidgen occasionally, it would obviously be less severe. -- Irrational beliefs ultimately lead to irrational acts. -- Larry Dighera, |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Stuck valve or maybe a floating valve?
mike regish "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... One other thing to consider is a stuck valve. Your description sounds similar to my understanding of the symptoms of a stuck valve. KB |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| engine trouble | mindenpilot | Owning | 16 | February 10th 05 03:17 AM |
| ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Owning | 4 | September 27th 04 08:36 PM |
| Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 07:42 PM |
| Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 05:09 PM |
| Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 05:29 AM |