A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mythbusters and explosive decompression



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 9th 04, 11:50 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


I'd think that frangible bullets would be the better option to
minimize collateral damage and take the risk that the hijacker might
be wearing body armor.


This was pretty thoroughly hashed over on the newsgroups some months
ago. As it happens, I just recently posted one of the better responses
on my website:

http://www.warbirdforum.com/airliner.htm

To me, it pretty much demolished the notion of "explosive
decompression." The author also goes into the subject of bullets used
by sky marshals.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
Viva Bush! weblog www.vivabush.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mythbusters Explosive Decompression Experiment C J Campbell Piloting 49 January 16th 04 08:12 AM
More Explosive Decompression John Galban Piloting 5 January 7th 04 10:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.