![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky
Computer dropped my add on to your posting so will try again. Besides the round engines, the V's also had gearing. The Merlin in the P-51 had a two to one (ie, engine ran 3000 rpm on take off and prop turned 1500 rpm). Big John On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 08:03:06 -0400, Corky Scott wrote: You don't see that so much anymore in |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "AJW" wrote in message news:20040816181349.12901.00001819@mb- I don't know of a SEL airplane in general use that uses reduction gearing between the shaft and the prop, Dan. My old Navion, Helio Couriers, Republic Seabees, Cessna 175's... Lots of Rotax powered light planes... Not overly common, but they are out there. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DanH" wrote in message
... AJW wrote: [snip] For what it's worth, at 150 kts and 2500 RPM means the airplane advances about 6 feet per prop rev. A two bladed prop means each balde is in air 3 feet ahead of the prior blade. That's the same number I came up with, but that assumes there's a one-to-one ratio between engine RPM and prop RPM. Is that true of all single engine piston aircraft? I'm obviously not an AC mechanic, but I thought I could see a reduction gear in the cowl. DanH In addition, the term "slippage" comes into play. That's the difference between the theoretical distance the prop should advance with each revolution and the actual. And besides a reduction gear creating a difference between engine and prop RPM, a constant speed prop gives control of the prop speed to the pilot or the prop governor mechanism. -- Scott |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tscottme" wrote in message
... In addition, the term "slippage" comes into play. That's the difference between the theoretical distance the prop should advance with each revolution and the actual. The slippage is only related to a theoretical number based on the prop pitch. For the purpose of this discussion, the only interesting thing is the prop RPM versus forward speed. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() DanH wrote: I'm obviously not an AC mechanic, but I thought I could see a reduction gear in the cowl. That was probably the flywheel -- they have toothed edges to mesh with the starter. If gears are used for a reduction system, they are likely to be enclosed in a housing; you wouldn't be able to see them. George Patterson If you want to know God's opinion of money, just look at the people he gives it to. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
new theory of flight released Sept 2004 | Mark Oliver | Aerobatics | 1 | October 5th 04 10:20 PM |
A question only a newbie would ask | Peter Duniho | Piloting | 68 | August 18th 04 11:54 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
IVO props... comments.. | Dave S | Home Built | 16 | December 6th 03 11:43 PM |