Run In With Mr. Edwards

Sure, if you call being called a stupid jackass, twit, and told
to shut the hell up when speaking your mind "support".

Ah, hell, those are terms of endearment, coming from Jim...

;-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Jim Weir wrote in message . ..
(smackey)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

ok,ok-what is "snipping"?
Also, if Jay is an equal opportunity critic of the political
candidates, I'll retract my comment. I haven't been keeping track.
I'm just sooooo tired of the political potshots being taken...by both
sides.

Your call, sir. I'd suggest otherwise. I'd also suggest taking a
course on
learning how to snip.

Jim



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

There are arguments that will go on in the newsgroups for WEEKS about
netiquette, and whether top posting, bottom posting, or intermediate posting is
the "right" way to do it. What everybody agrees on, though, is that to reply to
a very long post with a sentence or two at the top or the bottom is a waste of
bandwidth.

Notice that everything in the message you sent back to me EXCEPT the part that I
am replying to is "snipped", or deleted. Especially if you bottom post, having
the whole group arrow down to find a one-liner is a waste of bandwidth AND time.

Jim



(smackey)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-ok,ok-what is "snipping"?



Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

"Jim Weir" wrote in message
...

Notice that everything in the message you sent back to me EXCEPT the part
that I
am replying to is "snipped", or deleted. Especially if you bottom post,
having
the whole group arrow down to find a one-liner is a waste of bandwidth AND
time.

Jim


Not if it is a GREAT one-liner! badaboom

Allen

"Jim Weir" wrote in message
...
There are arguments that will go on in the newsgroups for WEEKS about
netiquette, and whether top posting, bottom posting, or intermediate
posting is
the "right" way to do it. What everybody agrees on, though, is that to
reply to
a very long post with a sentence or two at the top or the bottom is a
waste of
bandwidth.

Notice that everything in the message you sent back to me EXCEPT the part
that I
am replying to is "snipped", or deleted. Especially if you bottom post,
having
the whole group arrow down to find a one-liner is a waste of bandwidth AND
time.

Jim



(smackey)
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-ok,ok-what is "snipping"?






But it is polite to add snip in place of the text that was snipped...


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.744 / Virus Database: 496 - Release Date: 8/24/2004

the guts to finally come clean. Why don't you just admit that you are
against anything that Kerry/Edwards stand for, and are just another
Bush/Cheney toady?!

Because it's not true -- I think they're all assholes.

I guess that makes me an "equal opportunity twit", eh?

;-)

My wife and I annually fly to the midwest, and I had planned on
stopping by to stay at your 3rd rate motel, just from a sense of
pilot-comraderie. Forget it.

Gosh, if you get this worked up about a Usenet discussion -- about politics,
of all things! -- I'd appreciate it if you'd stay the hell away from my
airport.

You're a bit too unstable to be piloting a plane.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
newsZ1Xc.42728$9d6.13710@attbi_s54...
the guts to finally come clean. Why don't you just admit that you are
against anything that Kerry/Edwards stand for, and are just another
Bush/Cheney toady?!

Because it's not true -- I think they're all assholes.

I guess that makes me an "equal opportunity twit", eh?

;-)

My wife and I annually fly to the midwest, and I had planned on
stopping by to stay at your 3rd rate motel, just from a sense of
pilot-comraderie. Forget it.

Gosh, if you get this worked up about a Usenet discussion -- about
politics,
of all things! -- I'd appreciate it if you'd stay the hell away from my
airport.

You're a bit too unstable to be piloting a plane.

He probably things someone honking at him (as he intrudes into someone
else's lane) is "Road Rage".

smackey wrote:


The incident you report had nothing
to do with John Edwards; it is a result
of the necessary security that
surrounds every major pres/VP candidate.

Except that it is not "necessary".


Jack

"Jack" wrote in message
...
smackey wrote:


The incident you report had nothing
to do with John Edwards; it is a result
of the necessary security that
surrounds every major pres/VP candidate.

Except that it is not "necessary".

Teddy Roosevelt, Milwaukee 1912.

Tom S. wrote:

smackey wrote:

...the necessary security that
surrounds every major pres/VP candidate.

Teddy Roosevelt, Milwaukee 1912.

Thanks for the great set-up, TS.

I can't imagine Kerry deciding that since he wasn't coughing up blood that he would
press on with his scheduled speech after taking a bullet, as TR did. We could expect
JFK2, IAW his previous behavior WRT PH and other medal claims, to proclaim himself a
hero from a plush hospital suite, while Edwards launched huge civil law suits against
every deep pocket within a hundred miles.

Sirhan Bishara Sirhan, an Arab terrorist if ever there was one, would make a better
example of why Presidential candidates need protection. Of course, there is no
expectation that Kerry could change this country for the better, as RFK could have done.


Jack