A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rep vs. Dem Differences



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 04, 02:15 AM
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C J Campbell wrote:

"James Robinson" wrote in message
...
Wdtabor wrote:

The Nazi Party was the National SOCIALIST Party, fascsim is a left wing
philosophy, it never has had anything to do with the political right.

It is
only characterized as such by entertainers with no knowledge of history.


Someone doesn't know the definition of right and left.


Probably you.

Right wing philosophies tend to be conservative, want to retain
traditional values, and often advocate the establishment of an
authoritarian political order.

Left wing philosophies promote political change, and generally promote
greater freedom and well being of the common man.

Fascism, and by extension Nazism, are clearly right wing philosophies.
They cannot be characterized as being "liberal" by any stretch of the
imagination.


At least that is how the left thinks of it.


Nope. That's how the dictionary thinks of it.
  #2  
Old August 31st 04, 02:26 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"James Robinson" wrote in message
...
C J Campbell wrote:

Right wing philosophies tend to be conservative, want to retain
traditional values, and often advocate the establishment of an
authoritarian political order.

Left wing philosophies promote political change, and generally promote
greater freedom and well being of the common man.

Fascism, and by extension Nazism, are clearly right wing philosophies.
They cannot be characterized as being "liberal" by any stretch of the
imagination.


At least that is how the left thinks of it.


Nope. That's how the dictionary thinks of it.


If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and
which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common
man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself.


  #3  
Old August 31st 04, 02:42 AM
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C J Campbell wrote:

If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change
and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being
of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts
itself.


That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was.

http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics

"Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous
opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing
tenet of Nazi fascism."

Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing

"... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the
right"."
"Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists,
Communists, and Socialists."

http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html

"Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the
nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other
loyalties."

"Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it
borrows concepts and practices from all three."

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing

"... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be
expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism
being of the right, and communism being of the left."
  #4  
Old August 31st 04, 03:03 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"James Robinson" wrote in message
...
C J Campbell wrote:

If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change
and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being
of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts
itself.


That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was.

http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics

"Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous
opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing
tenet of Nazi fascism."

Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing

"... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the
right"."
"Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists,
Communists, and Socialists."

http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html

"Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the
nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other
loyalties."

"Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it
borrows concepts and practices from all three."

http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing

"... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be
expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism
being of the right, and communism being of the left."


Now you are contradicting yourself. Now you are saying that communism is
left wing conservatism, where before you defined the left as being liberal.

I don't give a hoot about your definitions. They are self contradictory and
arbitrary, as many have pointed out before me.


  #5  
Old August 31st 04, 03:42 AM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"James Robinson" wrote in message
...
C J Campbell wrote:

If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change
and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being
of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts
itself.


That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was.

http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics

"Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous
opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing
tenet of Nazi fascism."

Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing

"... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the
right"."
"Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists,
Communists, and Socialists."

http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html

"Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the
nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other
loyalties."

"Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it
borrows concepts and practices from all three."


Bad definition since Fascism, under both Mussolini and Hitler, were strongly
influenced by Marx.

"Thus state of mind, which subordinates the interests of the

ego to the conservation of the community, is really the first

premise for every truly human culture..." Adolf Hitler, _Mein_Kampf_


I have learned a great deal from Marxism, as I do not hesitate to admit.

The difference between them and myself is that I have really put into

practice what these peddlers and pen-pushers have timidly begun.... I had

only to develop logically what Social Democracy repeatedly failed in

because of its attempt to realize its evolution within the framework of

democracy. National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could

have broken its absurd and artificial ties with a democratic order.

--Hitler to Rauschning



http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing

"... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be
expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism
being of the right, and communism being of the left."


Actually, communism is considered "progressive", the antithesis of
"conservatives".


  #6  
Old September 1st 04, 03:03 PM
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C J Campbell wrote:

If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change
and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being
of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts
itself.


Nazism was the antithesis of what you describe above.

It was very authoritarian, opposed to individual freedom in deference to
the power of the state, and believe in forced suppression of any
opposition. While it might have seemed that they promoted political
change, they change they wanted was a return to more traditional morals,
which was a conservative philosophy.
  #7  
Old August 31st 04, 05:41 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , James Robinson
writes:


Fascism, and by extension Nazism, are clearly right wing philosophies.
They cannot be characterized as being "liberal" by any stretch of the
imagination.


At least that is how the left thinks of it.


Nope. That's how the dictionary thinks of it.



Fascism comes in a number of flavors, but the key elements a

An authoritarian power structure
A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do)
Expansionist foreign policy
A central ethnic, religious or nationalist identity

The first two elements require supremacy of the collective over the individual,
which is why fascist regimes rise from democracies but not from republics. The
the extent we stray from our Constitutional Republic toward a democracy, we
risk becoming a fascist state.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
  #8  
Old September 1st 04, 04:13 AM
James Robinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wdtabor wrote:

Fascism comes in a number of flavors, but the key elements a

An authoritarian power structure


Agreed.

A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do)


Disagree. While Fascism morphed somewhat over time, it was intensely
against socialism from the beginning. That opposition was one of the
prime tenets of the philosophy. That said, the ideology was also
against a completely free economy, preferring government direction, but
also not for the benefit of the masses. The idea of government control
was more in line with their authoritarian bent than it was a statement
of left or right leaning in economic terms. Overall, using strictly an
economic measure, Fascism was neither left nor right, but somewhere
slightly right of center.
  #9  
Old September 1st 04, 04:41 AM
Tom S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"James Robinson" wrote in message
...
Wdtabor wrote:

Fascism comes in a number of flavors, but the key elements a

An authoritarian power structure


Agreed.

A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do)


Disagree. While Fascism morphed somewhat over time, it was intensely
against socialism from the beginning. That opposition was one of the
prime tenets of the philosophy. That said, the ideology was also
against a completely free economy, preferring government direction, but
also not for the benefit of the masses. The idea of government control
was more in line with their authoritarian bent than it was a statement
of left or right leaning in economic terms.


In other words, a collectivist economy, as Wdtabor stated.

Overall, using strictly an
economic measure, Fascism was neither left nor right, but somewhere
slightly right of center.


Irrelevant.


  #10  
Old September 1st 04, 04:16 PM
Wdtabor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , James Robinson
writes:


A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do)


Disagree. While Fascism morphed somewhat over time, it was intensely
against socialism from the beginning. That opposition was one of the
prime tenets of the philosophy. That said, the ideology was also
against a completely free economy, preferring government direction, but
also not for the benefit of the masses. The idea of government control
was more in line with their authoritarian bent than it was a statement
of left or right leaning in economic terms. Overall, using strictly an
economic measure, Fascism was neither left nor right, but somewhere
slightly right of center.


You might want to read Hayek's ROAD TO SERFDOM as it deals specifically with
the rise of Nazi fascism from socialist roots. And he was there to see it
happen.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aluminum differences Lou Parker Home Built 16 August 25th 04 06:48 PM
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? carlos Owning 17 January 29th 04 08:55 PM
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? Richard Hertz Instrument Flight Rules 19 January 25th 04 07:49 PM
Differences in models of Foster500 loran Ray Andraka Owning 1 September 3rd 03 10:47 PM
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster Morgans Home Built 3 August 6th 03 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.