![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
"James Robinson" wrote in message ... Wdtabor wrote: The Nazi Party was the National SOCIALIST Party, fascsim is a left wing philosophy, it never has had anything to do with the political right. It is only characterized as such by entertainers with no knowledge of history. Someone doesn't know the definition of right and left. Probably you. Right wing philosophies tend to be conservative, want to retain traditional values, and often advocate the establishment of an authoritarian political order. Left wing philosophies promote political change, and generally promote greater freedom and well being of the common man. Fascism, and by extension Nazism, are clearly right wing philosophies. They cannot be characterized as being "liberal" by any stretch of the imagination. At least that is how the left thinks of it. Nope. That's how the dictionary thinks of it. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Robinson" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: Right wing philosophies tend to be conservative, want to retain traditional values, and often advocate the establishment of an authoritarian political order. Left wing philosophies promote political change, and generally promote greater freedom and well being of the common man. Fascism, and by extension Nazism, are clearly right wing philosophies. They cannot be characterized as being "liberal" by any stretch of the imagination. At least that is how the left thinks of it. Nope. That's how the dictionary thinks of it. If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself. That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was. http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics "Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing tenet of Nazi fascism." Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing "... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the right"." "Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists, Communists, and Socialists." http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html "Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other loyalties." "Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it borrows concepts and practices from all three." http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing "... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism being of the right, and communism being of the left." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Robinson" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself. That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was. http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics "Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing tenet of Nazi fascism." Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing "... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the right"." "Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists, Communists, and Socialists." http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html "Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other loyalties." "Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it borrows concepts and practices from all three." http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing "... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism being of the right, and communism being of the left." Now you are contradicting yourself. Now you are saying that communism is left wing conservatism, where before you defined the left as being liberal. I don't give a hoot about your definitions. They are self contradictory and arbitrary, as many have pointed out before me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Robinson" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself. That's your definition of Nazism, not what it acutally was. http://encyclopedia.fablis.com/index...-wing_politics "Nazis opposed individualism and laissez faire capitalism, vigorous opposition to international socialism was a founding and continuing tenet of Nazi fascism." Try these sources for why others label Fascism as right wing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right-wing "... fascism is almost universally considered to be a part of "the right"." "Like other forms, it arose in antithesis to the agenda of leftists, Communists, and Socialists." http://www.publiceye.org/eyes/whatfasc.html "Fascism is a form of extreme right-wing ideology that celebrates the nation or the race as an organic community transcending all other loyalties." "Fascism is hostile to Marxism, liberalism, and conservatism, yet it borrows concepts and practices from all three." Bad definition since Fascism, under both Mussolini and Hitler, were strongly influenced by Marx. "Thus state of mind, which subordinates the interests of the ego to the conservation of the community, is really the first premise for every truly human culture..." Adolf Hitler, _Mein_Kampf_ I have learned a great deal from Marxism, as I do not hesitate to admit. The difference between them and myself is that I have really put into practice what these peddlers and pen-pushers have timidly begun.... I had only to develop logically what Social Democracy repeatedly failed in because of its attempt to realize its evolution within the framework of democracy. National Socialism is what Marxism might have been if it could have broken its absurd and artificial ties with a democratic order. --Hitler to Rauschning http://www.disinfopedia.org/wiki.phtml?title=Right-wing "... fascism and communism share much in common, and this is to be expected since they are the most extreme forms of conservatism, fascism being of the right, and communism being of the left." Actually, communism is considered "progressive", the antithesis of "conservatives". |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
C J Campbell wrote:
If the dictionary says that Nazism, which promotes political change and which believes it promotes greater freedom and the well being of the common man is a right wing philosophy, then it contradicts itself. Nazism was the antithesis of what you describe above. It was very authoritarian, opposed to individual freedom in deference to the power of the state, and believe in forced suppression of any opposition. While it might have seemed that they promoted political change, they change they wanted was a return to more traditional morals, which was a conservative philosophy. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , James Robinson
writes: Fascism, and by extension Nazism, are clearly right wing philosophies. They cannot be characterized as being "liberal" by any stretch of the imagination. At least that is how the left thinks of it. Nope. That's how the dictionary thinks of it. Fascism comes in a number of flavors, but the key elements a An authoritarian power structure A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do) Expansionist foreign policy A central ethnic, religious or nationalist identity The first two elements require supremacy of the collective over the individual, which is why fascist regimes rise from democracies but not from republics. The the extent we stray from our Constitutional Republic toward a democracy, we risk becoming a fascist state. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wdtabor wrote:
Fascism comes in a number of flavors, but the key elements a An authoritarian power structure Agreed. A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do) Disagree. While Fascism morphed somewhat over time, it was intensely against socialism from the beginning. That opposition was one of the prime tenets of the philosophy. That said, the ideology was also against a completely free economy, preferring government direction, but also not for the benefit of the masses. The idea of government control was more in line with their authoritarian bent than it was a statement of left or right leaning in economic terms. Overall, using strictly an economic measure, Fascism was neither left nor right, but somewhere slightly right of center. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Robinson" wrote in message ... Wdtabor wrote: Fascism comes in a number of flavors, but the key elements a An authoritarian power structure Agreed. A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do) Disagree. While Fascism morphed somewhat over time, it was intensely against socialism from the beginning. That opposition was one of the prime tenets of the philosophy. That said, the ideology was also against a completely free economy, preferring government direction, but also not for the benefit of the masses. The idea of government control was more in line with their authoritarian bent than it was a statement of left or right leaning in economic terms. In other words, a collectivist economy, as Wdtabor stated. Overall, using strictly an economic measure, Fascism was neither left nor right, but somewhere slightly right of center. Irrelevant. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , James Robinson
writes: A collectivist economy (either socialism or feudalism will do) Disagree. While Fascism morphed somewhat over time, it was intensely against socialism from the beginning. That opposition was one of the prime tenets of the philosophy. That said, the ideology was also against a completely free economy, preferring government direction, but also not for the benefit of the masses. The idea of government control was more in line with their authoritarian bent than it was a statement of left or right leaning in economic terms. Overall, using strictly an economic measure, Fascism was neither left nor right, but somewhere slightly right of center. You might want to read Hayek's ROAD TO SERFDOM as it deals specifically with the rise of Nazi fascism from socialist roots. And he was there to see it happen. -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aluminum differences | Lou Parker | Home Built | 16 | August 25th 04 06:48 PM |
Differences between Garmin 295 and 196? | carlos | Owning | 17 | January 29th 04 08:55 PM |
differences in loc/dme and loc with dme appch at KRUT? | Richard Hertz | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | January 25th 04 07:49 PM |
Differences in models of Foster500 loran | Ray Andraka | Owning | 1 | September 3rd 03 10:47 PM |
question: differences between epoxy layup and plaster | Morgans | Home Built | 3 | August 6th 03 04:46 AM |