Rep vs. Dem Differences

"G.R. Patterson III" writes:
Newps wrote:

If Zell Miller is what democrats used to be I can
see why they had the House for 40 years.

I moved out of Georgia in '81, but I liked Miller a lot back then.


I live in Atlanta now and we (most of us) are very proud of him.

If Zell Miller is what democrats used to be I can
see why they had the House for 40 years.

I moved out of Georgia in '81, but I liked Miller a lot back then.

I live in Atlanta now and we (most of us) are very proud of him.

The Zell Miller speech was the most amazing thing I've seen in modern
politics.

We watched, cynically at first, wondering what this idiot was going to say.
I have little respect for politicians in general, and speechifiers
especially raise my shields. I automatically assume everything they're about
to say is B.S.

By the end, I was actually cheering out loud. I've never heard a Democrat
say so many things I've been feeling for so many years.

Say what you want about the guy -- he sure delivers a helluva speech. (And
it appeared to be delivered entirely from memory -- unless they have
teleprompters all over the auditorium?)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
news:U6j_c.101431$9d6.67523@attbi_s54...
If Zell Miller is what democrats used to be I can
see why they had the House for 40 years.

I moved out of Georgia in '81, but I liked Miller a lot back then.

I live in Atlanta now and we (most of us) are very proud of him.

The Zell Miller speech was the most amazing thing I've seen in modern
politics.

We watched, cynically at first, wondering what this idiot was going to
say.
I have little respect for politicians in general, and speechifiers
especially raise my shields. I automatically assume everything they're
about
to say is B.S.

By the end, I was actually cheering out loud. I've never heard a Democrat
say so many things I've been feeling for so many years.

Say what you want about the guy -- he sure delivers a helluva speech.
(And
it appeared to be delivered entirely from memory -- unless they have
teleprompters all over the auditorium?)
--
Jay Honeck

A good example of bull**** baffling brains

In article ,
James Robinson wrote:

So it really doesn't matter what Bush or Kerry did, you would simply
find fault with Kerry no matter what the situation was, and adapt your
story to fit?

Yes, nothing Kerry or Bush could have done would have made any
difference at all. Micheal Moore could have just as easily attacked
Kerry and made him look stupid. I can just see the cut backs with Kerry
sitting in a stupor and then seeing the planes hitting the buildings.
Its all propaganda

LG

In article , Bob Noel
writes:


Who has paid for the disposal of all that nuclear waste generated by the
power plants

how about having the users of the power plants pay for that?

From their money tree?

Their customers have to pay for it. No business really pays a tax, ultimately
all taxes (including FICA and Personal income) wind up buried in the cost of
goods and services.

--
Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS
PP-ASEL
Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG

"Martin Hotze" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

I don't care if the Europeans appreciate us or not

IIRC, they don't appreciate it, YMMD

, just so long as they
don't drag us into another stupid World War.

heck, you declared and entered war formally when attacekd on your own soil
(Pearl Harbor). Until then you helped the British with supplies. At that
time
the Nazis shot down american ships at the US east cost and nazi-submarines
waited close to the harbour of NY and cruised along the shoreline of
Florida.
AFAIK there have also been rules to darken the windows in cities at night.

you would not have entered WWII *in* *Europe* with not seeing only very
big
advantages. You haven't done it because you where nice guys.


So, your argument is that we were already involved in the war in Europe
before Pearl Harbor, but we would not have gotten involved in the war in
Europe if we had not been attacked at Pearl Harbor. Am I understanding that
correctly?

Jim Weir wrote in message . ..
In an on-the-air (*) broadcast, a BBC announcer was trying to explain the
difference between the Republicans and the Democrats to his British audience.

"The Republicans are verry like our ... ahhh ... Conservatives.
The Democrats are verry like our ... ahhh ... Conservatives."

(*) "on-the-AIR" makes this on-topic {;-)

My understanding is that the democratic party was not liberal enough
for the Canadians. They now have a liberal party in addition to the
democrat party.
If you feel guilty that you have the means to fly an airplane, you are
a democrat.
If you feel proud that you have succeeded enough in life to afford a
plane, you are a republican.

"Robert M. Gary" wrote in message
om...
If you feel guilty that you have the means to fly an airplane, you are
a democrat.
If you feel proud that you have succeeded enough in life to afford a
plane, you are a republican.

These generalizations! They're all BS, "wishful thinking" or pure
propaganda.

"Peter Gottlieb" wrote in message

These generalizations! They're all BS, "wishful thinking" or pure
propaganda.

You are so right! No pilots are brain dead enough to be true Democrats! G
(ducking while running)
--
Jim in NC

On Sat, 4 Sep 2004 18:15:23 -0700, C J Campbell wrote:

So, your argument is that we were already involved in the war in Europe
before Pearl Harbor, but we would not have gotten involved in the war in
Europe if we had not been attacked at Pearl Harbor. Am I understanding that

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
correctly?
^^^^^^^^^^

no.

#m
--
The more one is absorbed in fighting Evil,
the less one is tempted to place the Good
in question. (J.P. Sartre)