![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How long do you think before all pilots wind up on some
"watch list". Maybe we already are.... "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... Did you notice that in the local news coverage of the Oregon attorney who was incorrectly tabbed as a terrorist in the Spanish train bombing, it was stated that he had taken flight lessons? Oh, the horror!!! Bob Gardner "David Brooks" wrote in message ... "Peter MacPherson" wrote in message news:Zwl4d.26699$wV.2744@attbi_s54... I have a question.... Since this is for "training", "alien" CFI's are exempt since we're doing the training? I'm an "alien" CFI and if I understand this, I don't have to send anything to the TSA for myself, just fellow aliens that are seeking training. BUT, if I were to seek additional training, I would have to send the TSA the required doc. Or when I need a BFR(which is training), I would need to comply with this nonsense. I called AOPA with this question and they don't have an answer yet. My reply from Ian Twombly at AOPA says they understand flight review and instrument refresher are included, although they don't fit the model of "applying for a course of training". By "refresher" I think he referred to my question about "three and a hold", not just IPC. Actually, the whole model adopted by the rule is that you go to a school, apply for training, finish it, and you're done. I think of myself as a customer of the flight school who must happens to be taking lessons towards my Commercial, with occasional too-long layoffs, and with the occasional FR or instrument refresher thrown in. The $130 doesn't include the estimated $75 cost of fingerprinting. The TSA has foiled the terrorists once again!! All those terrorists that are about to start their IFR training will now be captured by the TSA!! And here I thought this agency were just a bunch of nitwits..... ; - ) "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One Nation Under Surveillance, Loosing All Our Liberty's and No Real Justice
For Anyone Unless Your A Politician! "Peter MacPherson" wrote in message news:lvm4d.234760$Fg5.18644@attbi_s53... How long do you think before all pilots wind up on some "watch list". Maybe we already are.... "Bob Gardner" wrote in message ... Did you notice that in the local news coverage of the Oregon attorney who was incorrectly tabbed as a terrorist in the Spanish train bombing, it was stated that he had taken flight lessons? Oh, the horror!!! Bob Gardner "David Brooks" wrote in message ... "Peter MacPherson" wrote in message news:Zwl4d.26699$wV.2744@attbi_s54... I have a question.... Since this is for "training", "alien" CFI's are exempt since we're doing the training? I'm an "alien" CFI and if I understand this, I don't have to send anything to the TSA for myself, just fellow aliens that are seeking training. BUT, if I were to seek additional training, I would have to send the TSA the required doc. Or when I need a BFR(which is training), I would need to comply with this nonsense. I called AOPA with this question and they don't have an answer yet. My reply from Ian Twombly at AOPA says they understand flight review and instrument refresher are included, although they don't fit the model of "applying for a course of training". By "refresher" I think he referred to my question about "three and a hold", not just IPC. Actually, the whole model adopted by the rule is that you go to a school, apply for training, finish it, and you're done. I think of myself as a customer of the flight school who must happens to be taking lessons towards my Commercial, with occasional too-long layoffs, and with the occasional FR or instrument refresher thrown in. The $130 doesn't include the estimated $75 cost of fingerprinting. The TSA has foiled the terrorists once again!! All those terrorists that are about to start their IFR training will now be captured by the TSA!! And here I thought this agency were just a bunch of nitwits..... - ) "David Brooks" wrote in message ... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. Faced with the requirement to send the TSA all the identifying information, finding someone to fingerprint me and figuring out how to get the prints filed, and paying $130 for the privilege - well, I wonder if the Commercial certificate is worth it. I did also have vague ideas of becoming an elderly instructor; forget that. Now, I know that sounds like special pleading, and Big Brother already has my fingerprints in my Resident Alien file so no big deal, and $130 is less than an hour of training, but right now it's looking like the final straw. And it's bull**** on the face of it. Residents have already undergone deep security investigations. If everyone reacts like me, the result will be less-well-trained pilots mixing it up with the rest of you in the sky. Is the BFR considered training under the rule (part 61 calls it instruction)? If so, the clock is ticking in any case. One justification in the rule says that the 9/11 terrorists learned to fly small planes, but there's no logic provided to support restrictions on existing certified pilots who want more advanced ratings. I mailed AOPA, I'll add these comments to the docket. I called my FBO, and the chief instructor said "oh, nice of them to inform the schools" and said she would start rattling cages. -- David Brooks |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Brooks" wrote in message
... I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. Ugh. I want to know when these kinds of regulations are going to start being implemented for the boat training industry. And the truck driving industry. And the driver education industry. How about the railroad training industry? IMHO, part of the problem is that's *only* been aviation that's been singled out, and we're just not big enough to make a difference. No one else cares about us, and we're not a large enough constituency for any politician to take us seriously. Seems like our best bet would be to simply start lobbying Congress and the TSA to close up the "security holes" that exist in all the *other* transportation industries. Once they start suffering under the same rules, then we'll have some seriously significant allies for the fight. Someone remind me...how long did it take the country to get through McCarthyism? Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... Someone remind me...how long did it take the country to get through McCarthyism? It IS a rather bizarre society. Guns are encouraged. I guess they are never misused.... Aviation is tightly controlled, more tightly every passing week. I guess aviation must be bad. -- *** A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within. *** - Ariel Durant 1898-1981 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Brooks" wrote in message ...
I've lived in this country for many years, paid my taxes, been a schoolteacher and a Scout leader, and now this: http://dms.dot.gov/search/searchResu...hTy pe=docket. The restrictions recently placed on 12500 training is being extended to all aircraft. TSA claims that Congress mandated it, and maybe we were all asleep when that happened. The rule is already in effect; the documentation and security training requirements kick in Oct 20. What does "Flight School" mean? Just 141 schools? Does this only apply to Student Visa applicants? Are they going to ask each of us as CFIs to inquire about out student's residency status, even if its some guy working on his private in his friends C-150? -Robert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And just to top it all off ... AOPA doesn't care.
http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...040923tsa.html Not even a mention of Permanent Residents. Not even a mention that permanent residents already went through background checks, finger printing, they are already on file with the Departement of Homeland Security (no less) ... nothing. I am an AOPA member but as far as they are concerned I do not exist. I might even understand where the TSA is coming from and I might even appreciate that they are trying to defend this country, since after all, I live here too and my wife works in Manhattan and I really don't want to go through another day like 9/11. But at least, I expected the AOPA to stand up for us and try to make the point!! -- Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree completely. I'm going to call AOPA tomorrow and find
out why permanent residents are not part of their lobbying effort. "Marco Rispoli" wrote in message t... And just to top it all off ... AOPA doesn't care. http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...040923tsa.html Not even a mention of Permanent Residents. Not even a mention that permanent residents already went through background checks, finger printing, they are already on file with the Departement of Homeland Security (no less) ... nothing. I am an AOPA member but as far as they are concerned I do not exist. I might even understand where the TSA is coming from and I might even appreciate that they are trying to defend this country, since after all, I live here too and my wife works in Manhattan and I really don't want to go through another day like 9/11. But at least, I expected the AOPA to stand up for us and try to make the point!! -- Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter MacPherson" wrote in message
news:FUJ4d.37784$wV.7672@attbi_s54... I agree completely. I'm going to call AOPA tomorrow and find out why permanent residents are not part of their lobbying effort. I will be sending an email to Phil Boyer tonight. Not sure what good it will do ... but it's worth a try. -- Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just sent an email to Phil Boyer. I'll let you know what his response is.
"Marco Rispoli" wrote in message t... "Peter MacPherson" wrote in message news:FUJ4d.37784$wV.7672@attbi_s54... I agree completely. I'm going to call AOPA tomorrow and find out why permanent residents are not part of their lobbying effort. I will be sending an email to Phil Boyer tonight. Not sure what good it will do ... but it's worth a try. -- Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|