New theory of flight released Sept 2004

"Mark Oliver" wrote in message
. ..
The current theory of flight is based upon the Bernoulli's Principal, the
pressure of a fluid (liquid or gas) decreases at points where the speed of
the fluid increases. The airfoil is designed to increase the velocity of
the airflow above its surface, thereby decreasing pressure above the
airfoil. Simultaneously, the impact of the air on the lower surface of the
airfoil increases the pressure below. This combination of pressure
decrease
above and increase below produces lift. Pressure is reduced due to the
smaller space the air has above the wing than below. Air cannot go through
the wing, so it must push around it. The surface air molecules push
between
the wing and outer layers of air. Due to the bump of the airfoil, the
space
is smaller and the molecules must go faster.

THIS HAS A MAJOR PROBLEM - specifically inverted flight. The current
theory
of flight utilizing the Bernoulli's Principal is only applicable to normal
level flight. However, we know and observe that inverted flight is
possible. Thus, the Bernoulli's Principal is no longer applicable to
inverted flight, so there must be another theory that supports flight, be
it
level or inverted.

The new theory of flight is based upon the new theory of Gravitational
Vector Force (released Sept 2004). Utilizing Newton's laws that equal
opposite force is generated at right angles, be it applied at once or
successively, and if the angle is oblique (slanted) a new force is
generated. Then inverted flight is possible as force is always generated
at
right angles, and this is towards the ground in all cases. The net
difference between the initial velocity and resistance force generated at
the leading edge at right angles (downwards) creates a new force called
Gravitational Vector Force, and it travels in the opposite direction
(upwards) to maintain balance, impacting the bottom of the wing. The wing
becomes less efficient in inverted flight due to the design of the
airfoil,
however it is still possible.

This new theory of flight also supports the following;
1) the new force manifests at a faster rate than initial velocity, hence
the
wing becomes more efficient at faster speeds
2) As you extend spoilers and flaps at the leading and trailing edges, the
bottom of the wing now becomes "cupped" like a satellite dish, and able to
capture more Gravitational Vector Force, creating more lift

You may read more about this new theory at www.threexd.com

Mark Oliver



Ok what happens when you remove gravity and air? now that space flight is
within the reach of civilian man.

Here I am, popping up as usual whenever lift is mentioned. Dudley's saying
right now, "Uh, oh, here we go again."

This gravitational lift vector is one of the most misunderstood forces in
physics and misconceptions about it in media just won't die.

IT HAS NOTHING AT ALL TO DO WITH GRAVITATIONAL ATTRACTION.

The forces this theory refer to are a field of time space reality distortion
that is being project "towards" us in a fourth dimensional fashion from
aliens that inhabit the parallel universe that exists slightly separated
from ours by differing alignment of the string particles that compose the
various universes inhabiting what we think of as space we are alone in.

Don't get fooled by over simplifications of the reality around you. The web
site for this theory does just as much of a dis-service to the aliens (they
aren't really aliens because they are actually right next to us and have
been her all along) as the popular lift explanations do to Bernoulli and
Newton.

--

Roger Long

"Roger Long" wrote in message
...
Here I am, popping up as usual whenever lift is mentioned. Dudley's
saying right now, "Uh, oh, here we go again."


Actually, I'm finding this type of thing less and less worth the effort
it takes to post to it as time goes by. There might be others out here
that feel the same way as well....I don't know or even care any longer.
The Usenet experience in general has lost much of it's appeal for me ,
and the plain simple truth of it is that I just don't give much of a
damn any more. :-))
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Flight Instructor/Aerobatics/Retired

I know what you mean. I spend a lot more time over in the Cessna Pilot's
Association forums now. They have a bouncer to keep the riff raff and the
low wingers out / (twins are OK).

When I scan the messages now, I mostly look for the names first.

--

Roger Long



"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Roger Long" wrote in message
...
Here I am, popping up as usual whenever lift is mentioned. Dudley's
saying right now, "Uh, oh, here we go again."


Actually, I'm finding this type of thing less and less worth the effort it
takes to post to it as time goes by. There might be others out here that
feel the same way as well....I don't know or even care any longer.
The Usenet experience in general has lost much of it's appeal for me , and
the plain simple truth of it is that I just don't give much of a damn any
more. :-))
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Flight Instructor/Aerobatics/Retired

"Roger Long" wrote in message
.. .
I know what you mean. I spend a lot more time over in the Cessna
Pilot's Association forums now. They have a bouncer to keep the riff
raff and the low wingers out / (twins are OK).

When I scan the messages now, I mostly look for the names first.

--

Roger Long

I can actually forecast with some degree of certainty exactly what the
tone of a particular post under mine will be regardless of the subject,
before I open the post, simply by seeing the name on it.
Many of these, I pass on without opening them simply based on that one
single boring degree of predictability.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Flight Instructor/Aerobatics/Retired

Well now, I really have to ask. Did you correctly predict the tone of my
first post in this thread just from seeing my name?

--

Roger Long



"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Roger Long" wrote in message
.. .
I know what you mean. I spend a lot more time over in the Cessna Pilot's
Association forums now. They have a bouncer to keep the riff raff and the
low wingers out / (twins are OK).

When I scan the messages now, I mostly look for the names first.

--

Roger Long

I can actually forecast with some degree of certainty exactly what the
tone of a particular post under mine will be regardless of the subject,
before I open the post, simply by seeing the name on it.
Many of these, I pass on without opening them simply based on that one
single boring degree of predictability.
Dudley Henriques
International Fighter Pilots Fellowship
Flight Instructor/Aerobatics/Retired

Roger Long wrote:

The web
site for this theory does just as much of a dis-service to the aliens
(they aren't really aliens because they are actually right next to us and
have been her all along) as the popular lift explanations do to Bernoulli
and Newton.


Wait...are you suggesting that it's the aliens lifting our aircraft? That
would explain so much!

Why do *I* end up with the lazy alien, I'd like to know.

- Andrew

Andrew Gideon wrote:

Why do *I* end up with the lazy alien, I'd like to know.

Be content -- mine likes to play the maracas.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Andrew Gideon wrote:

Why do *I* end up with the lazy alien, I'd like to know.

Be content -- mine likes to play the maracas.


Hmmmph! Mine tries to play the control cables like a violin.

Andrew Gideon wrote in message gonline.com...
Roger Long wrote:

The web
site for this theory does just as much of a dis-service to the aliens
(they aren't really aliens because they are actually right next to us and
have been her all along) as the popular lift explanations do to Bernoulli
and Newton.


Wait...are you suggesting that it's the aliens lifting our aircraft? That
would explain so much!

Why do *I* end up with the lazy alien, I'd like to know.

You are going to have to get friendly with the Big Pink Sky Pixies.
They are replacing the old lift fairies who were all very good back in
the last century... :-))