![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the first things I did after getting my private ticket was
schedule a couple of flights with my CFI at night to get that level of comfort I wanted before I attempted it all on my own or with passengers. Sort of made pale by the stuff I did training for my instrument ticket, partial panel, at night with simulated electrical failure.. that's about as bad as it gets, the fact that I didn't just throw up my arms in despair was a testament to the training I had recieved prior. Robert Peter Duniho wrote: "Michael" wrote in message om... My answer as a CFI is - if not now, when? The student will have night privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly solo at night on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? The student will have passenger carrying privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly with passengers on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? Seriously...the above analogy is only a little facetious. The truth is that, once your student has passed his checkride, he will be legal to do a whole slew of things never covered in primary training. The only alternative to that situation is to make the primary training take orders of magnitude longer than it does now. Some things can be explored by the pilot on his own, gradually expanding his envelope of flight skills, others really will require additional training time with a qualified instructor before the student ought to try them. But in all cases, they are examples of things that the student is not going to be approved to do by his instructor before the checkride, nor should he be, even though the FAA will consider him legal to attempt after the checkride. I think it's great that you are able to train your students to solo proficiency in night flight during the course of the student's training (you don't say how often you are able to do this in the minimum three hours), but the argument "he'll be able to do it after the checkride, so why not before?" is just plain silly. It carries no logical weight whatsoever. Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the first things I did after getting my private ticket was
schedule a couple of flights with my CFI at night to get that level of comfort I wanted before I attempted it all on my own or with passengers. Sort of made pale by the stuff I did training for my instrument ticket, partial panel, at night with simulated electrical failure.. that's about as bad as it gets, the fact that I didn't just throw up my arms in despair was a testament to the training I had recieved prior. Robert Peter Duniho wrote: "Michael" wrote in message om... My answer as a CFI is - if not now, when? The student will have night privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly solo at night on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? The student will have passenger carrying privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly with passengers on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? Seriously...the above analogy is only a little facetious. The truth is that, once your student has passed his checkride, he will be legal to do a whole slew of things never covered in primary training. The only alternative to that situation is to make the primary training take orders of magnitude longer than it does now. Some things can be explored by the pilot on his own, gradually expanding his envelope of flight skills, others really will require additional training time with a qualified instructor before the student ought to try them. But in all cases, they are examples of things that the student is not going to be approved to do by his instructor before the checkride, nor should he be, even though the FAA will consider him legal to attempt after the checkride. I think it's great that you are able to train your students to solo proficiency in night flight during the course of the student's training (you don't say how often you are able to do this in the minimum three hours), but the argument "he'll be able to do it after the checkride, so why not before?" is just plain silly. It carries no logical weight whatsoever. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Commented below look down!
----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Duniho" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:40 PM Subject: Student night solo? The student will have passenger carrying privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly with passengers on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? As I understand it the DE on the checkride is the students first passanger evaluating the student. Seriously...the above analogy is only a little facetious. The truth is that, once your student has passed his checkride, he will be legal to do a whole slew of things never covered in primary training. Only thing I can think of is carring passangers and lower weather min for some! As a student I was doing solo SVFR flights in the pattern. If they are renting they may not be able to do a few things like soft field unless approved by the FBO or Club. The only alternative to that situation is to make the primary training take orders of magnitude longer than it does now. I have not meet one person that has done the primary training in the min time usually 20 to 40 hours more then required. Some things can be explored by the pilot on his own, gradually expanding his envelope of flight skills, others really will require additional training time with a qualified instructor before the student ought to try them. Humm?????? Like with all things of skill, But they should be at a skill level that meets or exceeds PTS prior to check ride. But in all cases, they are examples of things that the student is not going to be approved to do by his instructor before the checkride, nor should he be, even though the FAA will consider him legal to attempt after the checkride. I was allowed to do every thing in the PTS as a student on solo flights as long as I demonstrated profiecenty. I think it's great that you are able to train your students to solo proficiency in night flight during the course of the student's training (you don't say how often you are able to do this in the minimum three hours), but the argument "he'll be able to do it after the checkride, so why not before?" is just plain silly. So if you know a student cannot fly well or be safe at night you would sign him off for a check ride knowing that he would be unsafe at night? that is just plain silly and rather reckless. The point of it all is building proficiency not racing the clock to see how few of hours you can do it in required 3 hours but if it take 10 or 12 or even 20 hours of night to be safe & proficient then so be it. It carries no logical weight whatsoever. Just because they are not examined except by the instructor on night flying and night proficiency doesn't mean you can skimp on that part of the flight training. Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/13/2004 14:25, NW_PILOT wrote:
Commented below look down! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Duniho" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.student,rec.aviation.piloting Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 4:40 PM Subject: Student night solo? The student will have passenger carrying privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly with passengers on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? As I understand it the DE on the checkride is the students first passanger evaluating the student. I don't think that's true. According to the FARs, you cannot carry passengers until you have the certificate. Therefore, the examiner is still the instructor and the student is still logging dual instruction time. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NW_PILOT" wrote in message
... As I understand it the DE on the checkride is the students first passanger evaluating the student. No. The examiner is not a "passenger" by FAA definitions. The FAA decided this so as to prevent any confusion about whether a student pilot may carry passengers or not. But even if the examiner were a passenger, so what? The student is not allowed to carry passengers prior to the checkride. Only thing I can think of is carring passangers and lower weather min for some! Well, then you're either not thinking very hard, or you're a relatively low-time pilot (or a high-time pilot with the same hours thousands of times). Flying airplanes can involve a wide variety of things that are never touched on during primary training. As a student I was doing solo SVFR flights in the pattern. FAR 61.89 "(a) A student pilot may not act as pilot in command of an aircraft ![]() miles during daylight hours or 5 statute miles at night". Okay, so you managed to stay out of some clouds as a student...so what? You didn't *really* fly minimum "special VFR" weather as a student. If they are renting they may not be able to do a few things like soft field unless approved by the FBO or Club. Soft field landings should be covered during primary training. However, things like: -- landing on a beach -- flying through a mountain pass -- landing at LAX -- VFR over the top of a solid cloud layer -- maximum gross operations -- not to mention, flying minimum 1 mile visibility, clear of clouds Special VFR just to name a handful are not covered during primary training, and yet a brand new Private Pilot is permitted to do any of those. I have not meet one person that has done the primary training in the min time usually 20 to 40 hours more then required. So what? The fact that training already takes longer than the minimum is not an argument for adding even MORE things to the training. Humm?????? Like with all things of skill, But they should be at a skill level that meets or exceeds PTS prior to check ride. Again, there is a wide variety of things that are simply not covered during primary training, nor are they part of the Private Pilot Practical Test Standards. How in the world is a pilot supposed to fly "at a skill level that meets or exceeds PTS prior to check ride" if those things are not even in the PTS? I was allowed to do every thing in the PTS as a student on solo flights as long as I demonstrated profiecenty. Goodie for you. So what? but the argument "he'll be able to do it after the checkride, so why not before?" is just plain silly. So if you know a student cannot fly well or be safe at night you would sign him off for a check ride knowing that he would be unsafe at night? I have no idea where you got such a ridiculous idea. that is just plain silly and rather reckless. Of course it is. So what? The point of it all is building proficiency not racing the clock to see how few of hours you can do it in required 3 hours So what? I never said "the point of it all" is "racing the clock". but if it take 10 or 12 or even 20 hours of night to be safe & proficient then so be it. Yes, so be it. It takes as much time to train a pilot to certain standards as it takes the pilot to be trained to those standards. That's not exactly a news flash, and I never disagreed with that philosophy. However, even in 10 hours, you are not going to train a pilot to complete proficiency in night flying. And even if you could, that does not necessarily mean that there's generally going to be a good reason for an instructor to take the risk of endorsing the student for solo night flight (though, obviously in some cases, there will be a good reason to do so). Just because they are not examined except by the instructor on night flying and night proficiency doesn't mean you can skimp on that part of the flight training. I never said you could. It appears to me that you are simply making up stuff to disagree with. None of the stuff you are disagreeing with are in any way representative of statements I've made. Pete |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael" wrote in message
om... My answer as a CFI is - if not now, when? The student will have night privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly solo at night on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? The student will have passenger carrying privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly with passengers on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? Seriously...the above analogy is only a little facetious. The truth is that, once your student has passed his checkride, he will be legal to do a whole slew of things never covered in primary training. The only alternative to that situation is to make the primary training take orders of magnitude longer than it does now. Some things can be explored by the pilot on his own, gradually expanding his envelope of flight skills, others really will require additional training time with a qualified instructor before the student ought to try them. But in all cases, they are examples of things that the student is not going to be approved to do by his instructor before the checkride, nor should he be, even though the FAA will consider him legal to attempt after the checkride. I think it's great that you are able to train your students to solo proficiency in night flight during the course of the student's training (you don't say how often you are able to do this in the minimum three hours), but the argument "he'll be able to do it after the checkride, so why not before?" is just plain silly. It carries no logical weight whatsoever. Pete |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message om... (Michael) wrote in message . com... Dave S wrote My answer as a non-CFI is.. I would expect the number of CFI's who actually endorse a student for night solo to be VERY low.. simply as a result of the environment in which we instruct and train. My answer as a CFI is - if not now, when? The student will have night privileges when he passes the checkride. Therefore, if you don't feel comfortable having him fly solo at night on your ticket, how can you send him to the checkride? I don't feel comfortable signing my students off for cross countries from San Francisco to New York either but their private priv will allow it. I expect students will ask for extra training in certain areas as they grown in their private. Most don't do any night flying for the first year or so after their private so anything given would be mostly lost anyway. -Robert, CFI Robert, what is the speed and range of the airplane your training in? I would love to have enough range to make it from San Francisco to New York in 1 day during daylight hours only! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"NW_PILOT" wrote in message
... Robert, what is the speed and range of the airplane your training in? I would love to have enough range to make it from San Francisco to New York in 1 day during daylight hours only! He never said anything about making it from SF to NY "in 1 day during daylight hours only". Why in the world do you think he did? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Night solo XC? | G. Burkhart | Piloting | 51 | October 14th 04 03:11 PM |
Another Frustrated Student Pilot | OutofRudder | Piloting | 13 | January 24th 04 02:20 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |