![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zatatime wrote in message . ..
(This may be wrong but,)I believe when a TPA is not explicitly stated in the AF/D the expected TPA is 800' AGL. That was probably correct 10 or so years ago, but the new standard TPA is 1000' AGL if not stated in the AFD. The AIM was changed to reflect this. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:59:38 -0400, Corky Scott
wrote: How's that? If you look at the field elevation on the sectional, and add 1000 feet, that's the pattern altitude isn't it? Are there lots of airports that specify a non standard pattern altitude? Many of them, especially small ones. The airport I fly from has a field altitude of 100 feet and a TPA of 900. I have the essential information on 10 airports on my knee-board. On six of them your system would be correct. The others vary from the thousand-foot rule by anywhere from 65 feet to 200 feet. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zatatime" wrote in message ... On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 12:38:52 -0600, Newps wrote: I'm going to 1000 feet. This would put you at the wrong altitude at a great deal of airports. Doesn't causing a safety hazard bother you? It probably would bother him if it posed a safety hazard. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Blanche" wrote in message ... Altho I'm an AOPA member, I would *never* trust the AOPA book on airports. There have been too many inconsistencies and wrong entries. The only legal and official reporter of airport information is the AF/D. What is legal and official about it? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Altho I'm an AOPA member, I would *never* trust the AOPA book on
airports. There have been too many inconsistencies and wrong entries. I've not found flight-critical information to be wrong in the AOPA book. I *have* found, on numerous occasions, however, inaccuracies in services provided, such as restaurants and mogas. It's still an essential tool that goes with us on every flight. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots | [email protected] | Owning | 9 | April 1st 04 02:54 AM |
Logging approaches | Ron Garrison | Instrument Flight Rules | 109 | March 2nd 04 05:54 PM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
question charity flight | Dave Jacobowitz | Piloting | 1 | November 14th 03 12:51 AM |