![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
... Just as a matter of curiousity, Jim, would it be the FAA who pursues this or the FCC? Does the FCC enforce the FARs? The FAA is as likely to enforce the wireless communications regulations as the FCC is to enforce the aviation regulations. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The FCC. Unless it is a violation that threatens ATC or something like that,
the FAA wants nothing to do with it. As a matter of fact, the unofficial FAA position on the FCC "bad radio" list is that they could care less if we say or do anything about it on an inspection. Jim "G.R. Patterson III" shared these priceless pearls of wisdom: - -Just as a matter of curiousity, Jim, would it be the FAA who pursues this or the FCC? - -George Patterson - If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have - been looking for it. Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Weir wrote: The FCC. Unless it is a violation that threatens ATC or something like that, the FAA wants nothing to do with it. As a matter of fact, the unofficial FAA position on the FCC "bad radio" list is that they could care less if we say or do anything about it on an inspection. Thanks. Thought that would be the case, but I got the impression they were a little lax on enforcing some of their other rules. Glad to know they can move when necessary. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The answer is yes. You can use any other frequency that you are authorized
to use, such as CB, Ham (If you are licensed), or the family radio band (those little handhelds at walmart). "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:5Oyfd.18870$SW3.479@fed1read01... "Gary G" wrote in message ... I've wondered if it is legal to utilize an "unused" frequency to communicate between planes or to someone on the ground for non-critical communication? I don't know what for, but let's say you want to talk to your friend or CFI on the ground who might give "additional instructions" on things. Or, another pilot close by wants to exchange some restaurant info or something. Or maybe a flying club wants to communicate or something. Is that legal? Is it ok? (Let's assume your monitoring other freqs that you need to) Hi Gary, Where I rent/train, the two closest uncontrolled fields use 122.8 and 122.7 so the FBO squeezes 122.775 in between for calling inbound when returning from the practice area or from cross countrys. The practice area (122.85) is close enought that you could, I suppose (if you had a dilemma...), hail the FBO to ask for help. The FBO freq is also handy if you need something from the office when you are out on the ramp preflighting and you don't want to leave the plane un-attended. Jay Beckman Chandler, AZ PP-ASEL Still nowhere to go but up! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | December 30th 04 11:16 AM |
Red Alert: Terrorist build kamikaze planes for attacks | Hank Higgens | Home Built | 5 | April 16th 04 02:10 PM |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | J.R. Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | April 15th 04 06:17 AM |
Conspiracy Theorists (amusing) | Grantland | Military Aviation | 1 | October 2nd 03 12:17 AM |
FS: 1989 "War Planes" (Of The World) Cards with Box | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 23rd 03 04:43 AM |