A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Co-pilot error caused AA 587 crash



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 2nd 04, 05:00 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Corky Scott" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:14:42 GMT, "Allen"
wrote:

This is simply wrong! If you do a check the majority of "SUV" type

vehicles
are not four wheel drive, although SOME of them are available as four

wheel
drive.

Allen.


But they're still classified as light trucks. I have not seen a
single ad or commercial for a two wheel drive SUV.

Corky Scott

4 WD SUV's are available in the Texas/Oklahoma area by special order,
otherwise SUV's at Ford, Dodge, Chevrolet, & GMC dealers are 2 WD.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #2  
Old October 29th 04, 09:51 PM
Chris W
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Corky Scott wrote:

Since they *MUST* have four wheel drive in order to keep their light
truck status, commercials continually hype the usefulness of their
off-road capability, despite the fact that many of them are sold in
states where no snow or ice normally falls.



Do you seriously think that snow and ice are the only reason to have
4WD? You need to get out of the city more. On steep mountain roads a
little rain can make 4WD helpful. Drive down a dirt road after some bad
rain often enough and you will wish eventually wish you had 4WD

--
Chris W

Not getting the gifts you want? The Wish Zone can help.
http://thewishzone.com

"They that can give up essential liberty
to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 Historical Review of Pennsylvania
  #3  
Old October 30th 04, 04:12 AM
Pooh Bear
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chris W wrote:

Corky Scott wrote:

Since they *MUST* have four wheel drive in order to keep their light
truck status, commercials continually hype the usefulness of their
off-road capability, despite the fact that many of them are sold in
states where no snow or ice normally falls.


Do you seriously think that snow and ice are the only reason to have
4WD? You need to get out of the city more. On steep mountain roads a
little rain can make 4WD helpful. Drive down a dirt road after some bad
rain often enough and you will wish eventually wish you had 4WD


I think the point is - not may 4WDs of the SUV variety ever see a dirt road.



Graham

  #4  
Old November 3rd 04, 05:13 AM
Bertie the Bunyip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Pooh Bear wrote in
:



Chris W wrote:

Corky Scott wrote:

Since they *MUST* have four wheel drive in order to keep their light
truck status, commercials continually hype the usefulness of their
off-road capability, despite the fact that many of them are sold in
states where no snow or ice normally falls.


Do you seriously think that snow and ice are the only reason to have
4WD? You need to get out of the city more. On steep mountain roads a
little rain can make 4WD helpful. Drive down a dirt road after some
bad rain often enough and you will wish eventually wish you had 4WD


I think the point is - not may 4WDs of the SUV variety ever see a dirt
road.


Of course, then there's planespotting, they're useful for standing on the
roof to get that elusive reggie!

Bertie
  #5  
Old November 1st 04, 03:33 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:51:29 -0500, Chris W wrote:

Do you seriously think that snow and ice are the only reason to have
4WD? You need to get out of the city more.


Guffaw, I live in rural Vermont in the woods off a mile long uphill
dirt road. My wife and I have had no choice but to use 4WD vehicals
if we really want to get home every day. And we still find some days
when even that doesn't work, days when it's raining on top of slush,
on top of ice. Thankfully, those conditions don't occur often.

On steep mountain roads a
little rain can make 4WD helpful. Drive down a dirt road after some bad
rain often enough and you will wish eventually wish you had 4WD


Can't tell you how many 4WD vehicals go off the road up here in
northern NE because the owners assumed that that feature would keep
them on the road in snow and ice. It doesn't. Whether you're driving
a Toyota Camry or a Humvee, go too fast for the corner in snow or ice
and you'll be off the road. The first snow storm of the season is
always a gotcha for many around here for two reasons: 1. The first
several storms, as well as the last several, are usually really greasy
stuff, far more slippery than the snow we get in mid winter. 2.
People do not slow down for the now marginal conditions, they continue
on as if it were summer and pay the price. Ok, there's a third
reason: not changing from the run down summer tires to new winters.

Most SUV's are luxury family vehicals located in suburbia and are not
driven on the dirt roads you mention.

Corky Scott



  #6  
Old November 2nd 04, 05:06 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Corky Scott" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:51:29 -0500, Chris W wrote:

Do you seriously think that snow and ice are the only reason to have
4WD? You need to get out of the city more.


Guffaw, I live in rural Vermont in the woods off a mile long uphill
dirt road. My wife and I have had no choice but to use 4WD vehicals
if we really want to get home every day. And we still find some days
when even that doesn't work, days when it's raining on top of slush,
on top of ice. Thankfully, those conditions don't occur often.

On steep mountain roads a
little rain can make 4WD helpful. Drive down a dirt road after some bad
rain often enough and you will wish eventually wish you had 4WD


Can't tell you how many 4WD vehicals go off the road up here in
northern NE because the owners assumed that that feature would keep
them on the road in snow and ice. It doesn't. Whether you're driving
a Toyota Camry or a Humvee, go too fast for the corner in snow or ice
and you'll be off the road. The first snow storm of the season is
always a gotcha for many around here for two reasons: 1. The first
several storms, as well as the last several, are usually really greasy
stuff, far more slippery than the snow we get in mid winter. 2.
People do not slow down for the now marginal conditions, they continue
on as if it were summer and pay the price. Ok, there's a third
reason: not changing from the run down summer tires to new winters.

Most SUV's are luxury family vehicals located in suburbia and are not
driven on the dirt roads you mention.

Corky Scott

It is obvious you have never been to the SE, Mid West, Central, or SW parts
of the country.
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #7  
Old November 3rd 04, 05:14 AM
Bertie the Bunyip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Corky Scott wrote in
:

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:51:29 -0500, Chris W wrote:

Do you seriously think that snow and ice are the only reason to have
4WD? You need to get out of the city more.


Guffaw, I live in rural Vermont in the woods off a mile long uphill
dirt road. My wife and I have had no choice but to use 4WD vehicals
if we really want to get home every day.


you could ****ing walk!


Bertie
  #8  
Old November 3rd 04, 05:12 AM
Bertie the Bunyip
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chris W wrote in news:E3ygd.83457$cJ3.13329@fed1read06:

Corky Scott wrote:

Since they *MUST* have four wheel drive in order to keep their light
truck status, commercials continually hype the usefulness of their
off-road capability, despite the fact that many of them are sold in
states where no snow or ice normally falls.



Do you seriously think that snow and ice are the only reason to have
4WD?



Of course not. there's the school run, posing next to it at the bar, beer
runs, posing next to it in your driveway, shopping runs, posing next to it
at work, driving into the path of oncoming trains when you dose off to help
with the overpopulation problem, posing inside of it while the cut you out
from under the train, The list is almost endless.

Bertie
  #9  
Old October 30th 04, 12:06 AM
Ralph Nesbitt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Corky Scott" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 04:19:36 GMT, "Ralph Nesbitt"
wrote:

Since when did the average "Soccer Mom SUV" become an "Off Road Vehicle"?
Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


Since they were first introduced back in the 70's. It's the loophole
that allows them to qualify as "light trucks" instead of normal
vehicals which means they do not have to conform to the exhaust
emissions regulations all normal cars are held to.

Since they *MUST* have four wheel drive in order to keep their light
truck status, commercials continually hype the usefulness of their
off-road capability, despite the fact that many of them are sold in
states where no snow or ice normally falls.

Where is the reg stateing this? SUV's are the favorites of those that need a
vehicle capable of seating as many as 9, or seating for as many as 6 with
room for their luggage.

Since they are literally (perhaps this has changed recently) built on
truck chassis, people who buy them because they think they are safer
than ordinary cars are mistaken. They, at least until recently, did
not have the crash engineering designed into them that ordinary cars
had. Also, SUV's, because of their higher than normal weight and
higher than normal height, end up being more prone to loss of control
in marginal traction conditions than ordinary automobiles. Or at
least, that is what some experts have attempted to point out for
years.

Built on a light truck chasis yes, The rest is a bit to much fertilizer
IMHO.

Oh yes, almost forgot, SUV's due to their "light truck" status, do not
have to conform to the fuel economy regulations regular cars must
adhere to either. As a result they are collectively known as gas
gusslers and are targeted by green activists for "tickets" against the
environment and some occasional vandalism.

Agree on the fuel economy regs. Gas guzzlers, no more than any other vehicle
in their towing class. Don't know any "Green Activists"

The light truck loophole was created originally to give hard working
farmers a break.

SUV's were originally designed as light closed vehicles for small buisnesses
such as florists, plumbers, carpenters, electricians, etc that were dressed
up/decked out & marketed to families needing a vehicle larger than a sedan.
Corky Scott

Ralph Nesbitt
Professional FD/CFR/ARFF Type


  #10  
Old October 30th 04, 12:27 AM
Scott M. Kozel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ralph Nesbitt" wrote:

"Corky Scott" wrote:

The light truck loophole was created originally to give hard working
farmers a break.


SUV's were originally designed as light closed vehicles for small buisnesses
such as florists, plumbers, carpenters, electricians, etc that were dressed
up/decked out & marketed to families needing a vehicle larger than a sedan.


That is true. I first saw Chevrolet Blazers on highway construction
projects in the mid-1970s, and that was one of the first SUV-like
vehicles, a light truck closed vehicle with 4-wheel drive.

--
Scott M. Kozel Highway and Transportation History Websites
Virginia/Maryland/Washington, D.C. http://www.roadstothefuture.com
Philadelphia and Delaware Valley http://www.pennways.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Military: Pilot confusion led to F-16 crash that killed one pilot Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 September 1st 04 12:30 AM
P-51C crash kills pilot Paul Hirose Military Aviation 0 June 30th 04 05:37 AM
Fatal plane crash kills pilot in Ukiah CA Randy Wentzel Piloting 1 April 5th 04 05:23 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 02:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.