A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Female pilot accident rates



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 1st 04, 02:04 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Mazor" wrote in message ...

Actually, the term fits this situation, thanks for pointing it out.


So I take it you disagree with Captain Boser when he states:

"I see the EEOC decrees to be the biggest threat against pilot
competency today, not because there aren't competent minority/female
pilots out there to be hired, but because quotas are imposed and
airlines sometimes have to lower their normal standards to achieve
those mandated numbers. If they don't, the EEOC sues them, costing
them many millions of dollars and it will result in the imposition of
even harsher mandates in the future to 'remedy their past
discrimination.'"

You neatly sidestepped this statement in my previous post. You
also sidestepped my question on what Captain Boser meant by
a "weak sister" pilot.

--------------------------
  #2  
Old October 31st 04, 04:30 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

NoPoliticsHere wrote:
It was just my OBSERVATION that in numerous
newsworthy crashes in the recent past, a woman has been in the

cockpit.
When I also combine my observation with the FACT of the

gender/race-based
quota system in this country, can't you see how easy it is to connect

dots?
Probably not I'm sure.

-------------------


I am not a fan of quota systems of any kind- I think they ultimately do
a disservice to those they purport to help.

What you have done here is begun with a supposition (women are hired on
the basis of political correctness and not competence) and then worked
backwards in order support that supposition. That is the worst sort of
analysis possible. Furthermore, you attempted to present this faulty
argument in a forum that deals with a subject you admittedly know
nothing about. If you wish to be taken seriously- here or in life- you
must think things through objectively. You have, it would appear,
failed to do so.

  #3  
Old October 31st 04, 05:29 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

" wrote in message roups.com...
NoPoliticsHere wrote:
It was just my OBSERVATION that in numerous
newsworthy crashes in the recent past, a woman has been in the

cockpit.
When I also combine my observation with the FACT of the

gender/race-based
quota system in this country, can't you see how easy it is to connect

dots?
Probably not I'm sure.

-------------------


I am not a fan of quota systems of any kind- I think they ultimately do
a disservice to those they purport to help.


Agreed.

What you have done here is begun with a supposition (women are hired on
the basis of political correctness and not competence) and then worked
backwards in order support that supposition.


No, what I have done is claim that ***SOME*** women and minorities are hired
when their gender and/or race takes on more importance than their competence.
It is hard to believe that you *still* miss my point.

That is the worst sort of
analysis possible. Furthermore, you attempted to present this faulty
argument in a forum that deals with a subject you admittedly know
nothing about. If you wish to be taken seriously- here or in life- you
must think things through objectively. You have, it would appear,
failed to do so.


And perhaps you could improve your reading comprehension.

---------------------
  #4  
Old November 1st 04, 07:14 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


NoPoliticsHere wrote:
What you have done here is begun with a supposition (women are

hired on
the basis of political correctness and not competence) and then

worked
backwards in order support that supposition.


No, what I have done is claim that ***SOME*** women and minorities

are hired
when their gender and/or race takes on more importance than their

competence.
It is hard to believe that you *still* miss my point.


Claim=supposition. Shall I drag out Webster's?

And perhaps you could improve your reading comprehension.


See above. And don't bother with law school- you'd never pass the LSAT.

  #5  
Old November 2nd 04, 05:29 PM
NoPoliticsHere
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

" wrote in message roups.com...
NoPoliticsHere wrote:
No, what I have done is claim that ***SOME*** women and minorities
are hired
when their gender and/or race takes on more importance than their
competence.
It is hard to believe that you *still* miss my point.


Claim=supposition. Shall I drag out Webster's?

And perhaps you could improve your reading comprehension.


See above. And don't bother with law school- you'd never pass the LSAT.


Thanks, your clueless responses have done more to back up my claims about
incompetent women than I could've done with any one or two posts.

---------------
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Who's At Fault in UAV/Part91 MAC? Larry Dighera Piloting 72 April 30th 04 11:28 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Effect of Light Sport on General Aviation Gilan Home Built 17 September 24th 03 06:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.