![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... Matt Barrow wrote: And the Greeks, Romans, Eastern Indians (all atheist or non-religious) that had such laws long before Christianity, they...hmmm These people all had religious beliefs. Not in the sense that CJ was using the term. You presume a lot if you are trying to tell me what I think. Yes, these people had religious beliefs in the sense that I was using the term. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() C J Campbell wrote: If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft are basically religious. Well, if you kill a man, he won't be paying income taxes anymore. There may even be some drain on the state funds to support his dependents in some fashion. And if thieves take much of his property, he may be unable to pay his taxes. It also encourages theft, and the government hates competition. Either has adverse effects on the health of society, and, like any good parasite (symbiotic or not), government has a vested interest in keeping its host healthy. George Patterson If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have been looking for it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message ... C J Campbell wrote: If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft are basically religious. Well, if you kill a man, he won't be paying income taxes anymore. There may even be some drain on the state funds to support his dependents in some fashion. And if thieves take much of his property, he may be unable to pay his taxes. It also encourages theft, and the government hates competition. Either has adverse effects on the health of society, and, like any good parasite (symbiotic or not), government has a vested interest in keeping its host healthy. So? There is no cost, either societally or economically, if gay marriages are legalized? Besides, why should the government care whether it collects taxes? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... So? There is no cost, either societally or economically, if gay marriages are legalized? Other than the usual cost of marriage, no. There's nothing special about gay marriages that make them any worse than any other marriage. Besides, why should the government care whether it collects taxes? All depends on the taxpayer, I'd guess. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft are basically religious. Hardly. A peaceful society requires that members of that society be safe and that their property remains safe. If murder and theft are allowed, the outcome is assured: rampant violence, and an enormous waste as everyone invests most of their resources trying to take what the other members of society have, including their lives. You don't need religion to justify rules against murder or theft. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft are basically religious. Hardly. A peaceful society requires that members of that society be safe and that their property remains safe. If murder and theft are allowed, the outcome is assured: rampant violence, and an enormous waste as everyone invests most of their resources trying to take what the other members of society have, including their lives. You don't need religion to justify rules against murder or theft. No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe? If you don't believe in trying to maximize human happiness, then there's nothing important about making society peaceful and safe. Maybe you don't hold that belief. Fortunately for me, and lots of other people, as humans we agree that being happy is a good goal, and thus being peaceful and safe is also a good goal. Very few people are happy when they are not safely at peace with other humans. From a purely pragmatic point of view, humanity can progress intellectually, technologically, and economically fastest if we aren't wasting time trying to kill each other. Pete |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe? If you don't believe in trying to maximize human happiness, then there's nothing important about making society peaceful and safe. Maybe you don't hold that belief. If a belief in maximizing human happiness is not a religious belief, what is it? After all, if we are nothing but sacks of chemicals, doomed in the end to become nothing but waste heat, why should we care what happens to us or to anything else? Nothing we do makes any difference at all if we eventually just become random ergs scattered throughout the universe. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... "Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe? If you don't believe in trying to maximize human happiness, then there's nothing important about making society peaceful and safe. Maybe you don't hold that belief. If a belief in maximizing human happiness is not a religious belief, what is it? Not a religious belief. You should not be trying to redefine religion, which is based on a god or gods and is best acknowledged as founded on the gullibility of the many and the calculations of the few. After all, if we are nothing but sacks of chemicals, doomed in the end to become nothing but waste heat, why should we care what happens to us or to anything else? Nothing we do makes any difference at all if we eventually just become random ergs scattered throughout the universe. Not random, my moorman friend. You can leave footprints in the sands of time, or be a lasting legacy like Charles Dickens or Henry Ford, sire children who will in turn sire children, perhaps even contribute to the fossil record --- like the missing link between Neanderthal and human recently discovered, or the subhumanoid bones recently unearthed in Indonesia. Having read some of your scribblings, however, I am not encouraged that your legacy will be anything more than dust. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
... If a belief in maximizing human happiness is not a religious belief, what is it? It's an innate desire, not a religious belief. It's basic biology. We come pre-wired to desire happiness. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Leaving the community | David Brooks | Instrument Flight Rules | 556 | November 30th 04 08:08 PM |
aero-domains for anybody in the aviation community | secura | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | June 26th 04 07:37 PM |
Unruly Passengers | SelwayKid | Piloting | 88 | June 5th 04 08:35 AM |
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? | John Clonts | Instrument Flight Rules | 81 | March 20th 04 02:34 PM |
Big Kahunas | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 360 | December 20th 03 12:59 AM |