A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Leaving the community



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 11th 04, 04:06 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


Matt Barrow wrote:

And the Greeks, Romans, Eastern Indians (all atheist or non-religious)

that
had such laws long before Christianity, they...hmmm


These people all had religious beliefs.


Not in the sense that CJ was using the term.


You presume a lot if you are trying to tell me what I think. Yes, these
people had religious beliefs in the sense that I was using the term.


  #2  
Old November 10th 04, 06:23 PM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



C J Campbell wrote:

If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft are
basically religious.


Well, if you kill a man, he won't be paying income taxes anymore. There may even be
some drain on the state funds to support his dependents in some fashion. And if
thieves take much of his property, he may be unable to pay his taxes. It also
encourages theft, and the government hates competition.

Either has adverse effects on the health of society, and, like any good parasite
(symbiotic or not), government has a vested interest in keeping its host healthy.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #3  
Old November 11th 04, 04:10 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


C J Campbell wrote:

If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft

are
basically religious.


Well, if you kill a man, he won't be paying income taxes anymore. There

may even be
some drain on the state funds to support his dependents in some fashion.

And if
thieves take much of his property, he may be unable to pay his taxes. It

also
encourages theft, and the government hates competition.

Either has adverse effects on the health of society, and, like any good

parasite
(symbiotic or not), government has a vested interest in keeping its host

healthy.

So? There is no cost, either societally or economically, if gay marriages
are legalized?

Besides, why should the government care whether it collects taxes?


  #4  
Old November 11th 04, 07:08 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
So? There is no cost, either societally or economically, if gay marriages
are legalized?


Other than the usual cost of marriage, no. There's nothing special about
gay marriages that make them any worse than any other marriage.

Besides, why should the government care whether it collects taxes?


All depends on the taxpayer, I'd guess.


  #5  
Old November 10th 04, 07:07 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft
are
basically religious.


Hardly. A peaceful society requires that members of that society be safe
and that their property remains safe. If murder and theft are allowed, the
outcome is assured: rampant violence, and an enormous waste as everyone
invests most of their resources trying to take what the other members of
society have, including their lives.

You don't need religion to justify rules against murder or theft.


  #6  
Old November 11th 04, 04:09 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
If you get right down to it, the only arguments against murder or theft
are
basically religious.


Hardly. A peaceful society requires that members of that society be safe
and that their property remains safe. If murder and theft are allowed,

the
outcome is assured: rampant violence, and an enormous waste as everyone
invests most of their resources trying to take what the other members of
society have, including their lives.

You don't need religion to justify rules against murder or theft.


No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe?


  #7  
Old November 11th 04, 07:11 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe?


If you don't believe in trying to maximize human happiness, then there's
nothing important about making society peaceful and safe. Maybe you don't
hold that belief.

Fortunately for me, and lots of other people, as humans we agree that being
happy is a good goal, and thus being peaceful and safe is also a good goal.
Very few people are happy when they are not safely at peace with other
humans.

From a purely pragmatic point of view, humanity can progress intellectually,
technologically, and economically fastest if we aren't wasting time trying
to kill each other.

Pete


  #8  
Old November 11th 04, 03:03 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe?


If you don't believe in trying to maximize human happiness, then there's
nothing important about making society peaceful and safe. Maybe you don't
hold that belief.


If a belief in maximizing human happiness is not a religious belief, what is
it?

After all, if we are nothing but sacks of chemicals, doomed in the end to
become nothing but waste heat, why should we care what happens to us or to
anything else? Nothing we do makes any difference at all if we eventually
just become random ergs scattered throughout the universe.


  #9  
Old November 11th 04, 05:46 PM
jls
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
No? Why is it important that society be peaceful or safe?


If you don't believe in trying to maximize human happiness, then there's
nothing important about making society peaceful and safe. Maybe you

don't
hold that belief.


If a belief in maximizing human happiness is not a religious belief, what

is
it?


Not a religious belief. You should not be trying to redefine religion,
which is based on a god or gods and is best acknowledged as founded on the
gullibility of the many and the calculations of the few.

After all, if we are nothing but sacks of chemicals, doomed in the end to
become nothing but waste heat, why should we care what happens to us or to
anything else? Nothing we do makes any difference at all if we eventually
just become random ergs scattered throughout the universe.


Not random, my moorman friend. You can leave footprints in the sands of
time, or be a lasting legacy like Charles Dickens or Henry Ford, sire
children who will in turn sire children, perhaps even contribute to the
fossil record --- like the missing link between Neanderthal and human
recently discovered, or the subhumanoid bones recently unearthed in
Indonesia.

Having read some of your scribblings, however, I am not encouraged that your
legacy will be anything more than dust.


  #10  
Old November 11th 04, 06:56 PM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
If a belief in maximizing human happiness is not a religious belief, what
is
it?


It's an innate desire, not a religious belief. It's basic biology. We come
pre-wired to desire happiness.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Leaving the community David Brooks Instrument Flight Rules 556 November 30th 04 08:08 PM
aero-domains for anybody in the aviation community secura Aviation Marketplace 1 June 26th 04 07:37 PM
Unruly Passengers SelwayKid Piloting 88 June 5th 04 08:35 AM
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 02:34 PM
Big Kahunas Jay Honeck Piloting 360 December 20th 03 12:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.