A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

drug/alcohol testing policy: effective?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 16th 04, 11:52 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chip Jones" wrote in message
k.net...

"Happy Dog" wrote in message
...
"Chip Jones" wrote in message

This guy I know started smoking cannabis in college. He enjoyed it so
much
and so often that he started losing control of the direction his life

was
going in. As you might expect, he soon saw falling school grades, low
energy, no motivation, etc., the classic results of habitual pot use.

It
was fun (he says), but it was a dead end. To steer his ship down a
straighter, narrower channel, this guy walked into a recruiting office

and
enlisted in the Marine Corps.


And you're sure that it was the dope that was the problem and not a

symptom?

Nope.


And your qualification to make that assessment are...?

Are you a psychologist that got into his head in detail, or are you merely
self-professedly psychic?

Gee...ever heard of "cause and effect"?


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO


  #2  
Old December 16th 04, 07:53 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chip Jones" wrote in message news:718wd.606

They are motivated to eat, if nothing else. But habitual
drug users aren't motivated to give a rats ass about much more than

getting
high.


Except the professor I know. PhD in--get this--criminology. Dude's an
expert in drug abuse arrest demographics. He and his father smoke pot
together, and his father is a very successful lawyer in Alaska. They spent
a month together with their families in New Zealand, bungee jumping and
sailing and surfing and scuba diving, while non-users like the CFIs on this
group struggle to pay their bills. I also know a habitual smoker who is
an accomplished physicist and progammer, just bought a 44' ketch once owned
by the Disneys, and works from his sailboat which, last I heard, was at the
Catalina Islands.

I also know two pot-smoking engineers, a former US Army Major who asked me
if I wanted to partake (I declined) and a woman who smoked pot in college
and graduated Suma Cum Laude from a university in Texas. Let's see...I
know a music teacher who smoked pot daily when we were in college together.
She quit five years ago and hasn't been **** tested yet. Geologist, a
jeweler, a crane operator...

Habitual aviatiors aren't motivated to give a rat's ass about much more than
flying.

-c


  #3  
Old December 16th 04, 07:57 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chip Jones" wrote in message news:718wd.606$

How about you, Spiccoli?


....then...

I am opposed to all forms of smoking, drinking alcohol, and boxing while
engaged in an air safety endeavour like commercial flying or air traffic
control.


Yeah, but....no offense. You sound like you have anger/hostility issues of
your own to deal with and, quite frankly, based on your responses to these
people here, I wouldn't get in an airplane with you because you seem, well,
like an arrogant prick. For example:

I can see for myself that you do know a lot about brain fade. Sorry to

hear
your life is so stressful. Good thing you aren't an aviation

professional!

....and...

I vote for chicken ****. Kinda like a guy who doesn't have the stones to
put his real name on a post.


Good luck with your flying career. I sure wouldn't have anything to do with
you in the cockpit, though. Before you start insulting other people, think
about your own faults and ask yourself if you're the kind of guy that people
would want to entrust their lives with, regardless of whether you're clean.

-c


  #4  
Old December 16th 04, 11:11 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chip Jones wrote:



I know, quite literally, over five hundred controllers. I have also served
as a union drug testing rep for NATCA. I am saying that this opinion is the
overwhelming consensus on this in 100% of the controllers whose hands I held
while they were peeing in a bottle. How about you, Spiccoli?



You guys need to reread the drug test regs. We get to go in the
bathroom alone up here. No hand holding needed.
  #5  
Old December 15th 04, 03:55 AM
NW_PILOT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Fisher" wrote in message
. ..
"gatt" wrote in message
The discussion is, is the aviation community's drug and alcohol

habit--or
lack thereof--influenced by drug testing policy; do pilots obstain

because
of drug tests, or do they obstain because they're pilots?


I personally think drug testing throughout all areas of transportation is

a
Very Good Idea.

Back in my younger years, I quit smoking pot because I got a job that did
random drug testing. That's good for y'all 'cause I was in charge of
remotely controlling the flows and pressures for thousands of miles of

very
high pressure natural gas pipeline. It would not be good if I forgot to
open or shut a valve when I was supposed to do so.

I didn't smoke pot while flying because that would be stupid.

I don't smoke pot now because my short term memory is bad enough as it is.

Testing kits aren't "prohibitively expensive" as your buddy says.
Twenty-five people can be tested for about $250.00. That may be

"expensive"
depending on how many you must do but I would not put it in the
"prohibitively expensive" category.

Either way, the cost of NOT doing pre, post and interim drug screening

would
be much higher than I'm willing to pay. Too damn many people are like I
used to be.

--
Jim Fisher



And then there are the people that have a lifetime supply by prescription of
vicodan, percodan, percocet, diazapam, or some other opiate, hypnotic or
designer pansy pill that have very bad effect on a persons judgment and
decision making skills than cannabis and leaves them highly susceptible to
suggestion. I would trust the guy that drinks & smokes cannabis at home then
work with someone on them make you feel happy pansy pills that they had out
like candy.


  #6  
Old December 15th 04, 05:45 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Fisher" wrote in message
news:2KJvd.77134

I didn't smoke pot while flying because that would be stupid.


Granted, there are plenty of pilots who do plenty of stupid things, but
that's how I look at it.

Too damn many people are like I used to be.


Heh. I applaud your honesty!

-c


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Testing Stick Ribs Bob Hoover Home Built 3 October 3rd 04 02:30 AM
Bush's Attempt to Usurp the Constitution WalterM140 Military Aviation 20 July 2nd 04 04:09 PM
Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) Anonymous Spamless Military Aviation 0 April 21st 04 05:09 AM
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Military Aviation 1 April 9th 04 11:25 PM
No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil Ewe n0 who Naval Aviation 0 April 7th 04 07:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.