A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What is Southwest airlines Nuts ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 30th 04, 08:44 PM
C Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


C J Campbell wrote:

I wonder if business travelers should bother with the airlines at all
anymore.


And "conference calls" will not do the job in many cases. We would've lost

a 50
mil contract if I couldn't have been face to face with the subject matter
experts on one occasion (our competition *was* face to face with them).


C-Calls are limited but with web-conferencing like WebEx the gap closes
meaningfully. No question that WebEx probably displaced 10-15% of my last
employer's travel budget. This is one of those "inflection point" issues.
Once people start assuming their competitors aren't getting on a plane they
won't get on one either. There will always be things that demand the
in-person presence but that list will shrink by 5% or so per year. A 35%
drop in business travel over the next five years is not out of the question
and would make 9/11 a footnote to the collapse of the airline industry.

-cwk.


  #2  
Old December 30th 04, 09:33 PM
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"C Kingsbury" wrote in message
ink.net...

"G.R. Patterson III" wrote in message
...


C J Campbell wrote:

I wonder if business travelers should bother with the airlines at all
anymore.


And "conference calls" will not do the job in many cases. We would've

lost
a 50
mil contract if I couldn't have been face to face with the subject

matter
experts on one occasion (our competition *was* face to face with them).


C-Calls are limited but with web-conferencing like WebEx the gap closes
meaningfully. No question that WebEx probably displaced 10-15% of my last
employer's travel budget. This is one of those "inflection point" issues.
Once people start assuming their competitors aren't getting on a plane

they
won't get on one either. There will always be things that demand the
in-person presence but that list will shrink by 5% or so per year. A 35%
drop in business travel over the next five years is not out of the

question
and would make 9/11 a footnote to the collapse of the airline industry.

-cwk.



That loss in business travel is more than enough to put one or two majors
out of business. They have only themselves to blame due to the fact they
ripped and continue to rip off the business traveler which for years has
paid top dollar for a seat.



  #3  
Old December 30th 04, 11:26 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
m...


That loss in business travel is more than enough to put one or two majors
out of business. They have only themselves to blame due to the fact they
ripped and continue to rip off the business traveler which for years has
paid top dollar for a seat.


First, the "business traveler" typically fly's on one or two days
notice...that's why they spend more.

Second, alternatives have been available for years...and only very SLOWLY do
businesses adopt them.

Hell, years ago the bitch was the delays and rigid schedules of the
airlines. Many people used GA and charter, but I guess most businesses just
continued to gripe, just like they do about bad employees, foreign
competitors, regulation (that they often asked for), etc., etc.,...


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO


  #4  
Old December 28th 04, 08:59 PM
Colin W Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave Stadt" wrote in message
...

Southwest flies more passengers by far than any other airline


Actually SWA has only become a top-5 player in the past five years or so.
Last I checked, DL, SW, and AA were all pretty close to each other.

http://www.bts.gov/press_releases/20...bts019_04.html

and is one of
a few actually making money. If other airlines want to survive it is the
Southwest model they will have to adopt.


Southwest does not operate a national network, but rather flies a large
number of point-to-point flights. The difference is subtle but significant.
SW is fine if you're going from Manchester to Midway, but if you're trying
to get to Boise it doesn't necessarily work so well and connection times
often run over two hours versus 60mins on a hub-and-spoke carrier. As
Southwest has gotten bigger and served more cities with higher frequency
this has become less of a problem, but their model has its limits. They
intentionally avoid most large airports (BOS, ORD, JFK, LGA, EWK, SFO) as
well.

-cwk.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Italian All-Cargo "Ocean Airlines" ellx Instrument Flight Rules 0 January 9th 05 10:05 AM
American and United Airlines and others sued alleging their negligence allowed the deadly hijackings Larry Dighera Piloting 23 September 17th 04 04:44 PM
Has Southwest Airlines banned aspartame from the cockpit? Dylan Smith Piloting 42 August 31st 04 03:10 PM
Why don't airlines also do charter jets? Scott T. Jensen General Aviation 18 January 6th 04 07:24 PM
Continental Airlines Complaint - A Newspaper article John B. Piloting 40 October 21st 03 04:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.