A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A380 spec's



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 20th 05, 02:25 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Dave" wrote in message
Trents are Rolls Royce, it is the Trent 900 details are
Engine certification was achieved on schedule in October 2004 through the
new European Aviation Safety Agency. Even though it will operate initially
at a maximum take-off thrust of 70,000lb, the Trent 900 is cleared at an
80,000lb rating, allowing margin for future growth. It reached thrusts in
excess of 90,000lb during early test bed running.


The Trents on the B-777 produce over 90,000 lbs. Aren't they the same engine
core?

D.


  #2  
Old January 20th 05, 02:29 AM
Colin W Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Worth noting that the 777 engines are actually quite a bit larger with
100,000+lb thrust capability:
http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/ge90/index.html

Of course it mounts only two so total thrust is quite a bit less...
-cwk.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Trents are Rolls Royce, it is the Trent 900 details are
Engine certification was achieved on schedule in October 2004 through the
new European Aviation Safety Agency. Even though it will operate initially
at a maximum take-off thrust of 70,000lb, the Trent 900 is cleared at an
80,000lb rating, allowing margin for future growth. It reached thrusts in
excess of 90,000lb during early test bed running.

With a fan diameter of 116 inches, the Trent 900 is physically the largest
engine ever built by Rolls-Royce. It is also the world's cleanest large
turbofan engine, measured by emissions per pound of thrust.



  #3  
Old January 20th 05, 04:16 AM
Cockpit Colin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

That is one mother of an engine!

"Colin W Kingsbury" wrote in message
nk.net...
Worth noting that the 777 engines are actually quite a bit larger with
100,000+lb thrust capability:
http://www.geae.com/engines/commercial/ge90/index.html

Of course it mounts only two so total thrust is quite a bit less...
-cwk.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Trents are Rolls Royce, it is the Trent 900 details are
Engine certification was achieved on schedule in October 2004 through

the
new European Aviation Safety Agency. Even though it will operate

initially
at a maximum take-off thrust of 70,000lb, the Trent 900 is cleared at an
80,000lb rating, allowing margin for future growth. It reached thrusts

in
excess of 90,000lb during early test bed running.

With a fan diameter of 116 inches, the Trent 900 is physically the

largest
engine ever built by Rolls-Royce. It is also the world's cleanest large
turbofan engine, measured by emissions per pound of thrust.





  #4  
Old January 21st 05, 10:12 AM
meme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:28:59 -0000, "Dave"
wrote:

Trents are Rolls Royce, it is the Trent 900 details are
Engine certification was achieved on schedule in October 2004 through the
new European Aviation Safety Agency. Even though it will operate initially
at a maximum take-off thrust of 70,000lb, the Trent 900 is cleared at an
80,000lb rating, allowing margin for future growth. It reached thrusts in
excess of 90,000lb during early test bed running.

With a fan diameter of 116 inches, the Trent 900 is physically the largest
engine ever built by Rolls-Royce. It is also the world's cleanest large
turbofan engine, measured by emissions per pound of thrust.

Hmmm I wonder if I could retrofit one of them to my C152 )
  #5  
Old January 20th 05, 10:00 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob,

In one, obviously
computer generated, it only had two engines.


Could that have been the A350?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #6  
Old January 20th 05, 02:54 PM
Bob Chilcoat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't think so. It had two distinct rows of windows. Obviously an
Airbus-generated video. My guess is that it was an early version where they
hoped to get larger engines, but who knows?

--
Bob (Chief Pilot, White Knuckle Airways)

"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
...
Bob,

In one, obviously
computer generated, it only had two engines.


Could that have been the A350?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)



  #7  
Old January 21st 05, 12:02 AM
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Chilcoat" wrote in message
...
I don't think so. It had two distinct rows of windows. Obviously an
Airbus-generated video. My guess is that it was an early version where
they
hoped to get larger engines, but who knows?


I doubt it, the A380 has always been a 4 engine craft.


  #8  
Old January 20th 05, 11:33 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ...
Bob,

In one, obviously
computer generated, it only had two engines.


Could that have been the A350?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)


Ahhh, the airbus 7E7...


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
402C Specs Robert Borucki General Aviation 0 February 2nd 05 07:22 PM
A380 unveiling, 1/18/05, Live. A Guy Called Tyketto Piloting 130 February 1st 05 08:53 PM
A380 avionics Sven Kesler General Aviation 0 September 23rd 04 02:17 PM
C-141 detailed Specs Phil M Military Aviation 1 January 27th 04 06:53 AM
Specs for a B24D Liberator John T. Slodyczka Military Aviation 0 November 21st 03 02:18 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.