![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How long have you been studying helicopters? Five minutes? Saying as
you did above that "lowering the collective wouldn't do anything for the tail rotor action" speaks volumes of your obvious lack of even the basics of flying helis. Oh yeah? Well explain to me how lowering the collective without reducing power would affect the effect (action) of the tail and improve matters in the scenrio. If anything, lowering collective would result in a reduced load on the rotor system and an INCREASE in rotor speed and a corresponding increase in tail rotor speed, which as you'll recal is no longer controllable, so the net result would be in increase in yaw rate. Lowering collective alone would NOT do anything for the uncontrolled yaw which our intrepid pilot was encountering. BEAVIS, YOUR ABOVE POST IS SO WRONG AND MISGUIDED THAT I WON'T BOTHER RESPONDING TO YOU ANY FURTHER AFTER THIS ONE. BUT DO YOURSELF ONE FAVOR BEFORE YOU AGAIN MAKE AN IDIOT OUT OF YOURSELF HE ASK ANY HELICOPTER PILOT WHO FLYS A SHIP THAT HAS A COUNTER-CLOCKWISE ROTATION MAIN ROTOR WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LOWER COLLECTIVE? HINT: YOU GET A NICE YAW TO THE LEFT SINCE YOU ARE TAKING TORQUE/POWER OUT OF THE SYSTEM AND SO YOU NEED TO APPLY RIGHT PEDAL. THAT RIGHT PEDAL TAKES THE PITCH/THRUST OUT OF THE TAIL ROTOR. WHEN YOU LOWER COLLECTIVE YOU ARE REDUCING POWER, MORON. STOP THINKING THAT POWER IS ONLY REDUCED BY REDUCING ROTOR SPEED. GO STUDY JUST A BIT. ONE MORE THING, THE FIRST THING MOST PILOT OPERATING HANDBOOKS STATE IS THAT IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF TAIL ROTOR EFFECTIVENESS IN FLIGHT THE FIRST THING THE PILOT SHOULD DO IS LOWER COLLECTIVE. YOU ARE TRYING TO ARGUE ALGEBRA WITH A MATH PRO WHEN YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T KNOW WHAT 2 PLUS 2 EQUALS. GO BACK TO YOUR TOYS. REGARDS, MARK PS HOW MANY PIC HOURS DO YOU HAVE IN HELICOPERS? I'D GUESS ZERO. NO WAIT, I'D GUARANTEE THAT YOU HAVE ZERO. He he |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
helicopterandy wrote:
GO BACK TO YOUR TOYS. REGARDS, MARK To the Group......... Yunno folks I've been lurking in this group for a number of years now, posting under various names now and again. Like most in this group I try to keep a civil tongue in my head and since I'm only an armchair pilot I sure wouldn't try to argue technicalities of flight, etc. I'm basically a knife and forker, a gladhander, who does what he can to promote a little chitchat, I pat people on the back for their accomplishments, and achievements.... blah blah blah blah blah. But yunno folks I just gotta say it..... In the years that I've been in this group I don't believe I have ever seen anyone like Mark who has just shown up in this group as a relative newcomer who has had such a chip on their shoulders. Mark I don't know what your problem is but Beavis has been a somewhat regular in this group for some years and you are the first person to my knowledge who has publicly attacked him, just like your the only person who has attacked Kevin, who is doing nothing more than sharing his experiences as a student, which for one, I am personally gratefull for his efforts. You post IN ALL CAPS and have been told at least once that doing so is considered boorish, and bad manners (netiquette), but that doesn't seem to sink in or make a difference to you. So before this goes too far, why don't you come back to this group and tell all of us specifically what it is that you personally are looking for in this group. What do you expect to get out of it, and what are you willing to contribute. So far if appears that your are spoiling for a fight with whoever is handy, and with all due respect ( in my personal opinion ) you are not going to make friends, or gain the respect of too many people if you continue to carry on the way you are doing. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
helicopterandy wrote:
BEAVIS, YOUR ABOVE POST IS SO WRONG AND MISGUIDED THAT I WON'T BOTHER RESPONDING TO YOU ANY FURTHER AFTER THIS ONE. BUT DO YOURSELF ONE (snip) You are full of it. Before you go off the hook, please understand that I mean you no disrespect, yet. Don't yell. Typing in all caps is deafening. Don't say something is wrong and misguided and idiotic without giving an immediate explanation. From what I am able to gather from your post, you don't acknowledge the fact that the rudder pedals are useless. In model helicopter terms, the left and right rudder are useless. In 'real' helicopter terms, again the rudder pedals are useless... What exactly is your problem with his statement? Please state it civilly. Max of Mad -- Leave a tone after the message |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "helicopterandy" wrote in message om... How long have you been studying helicopters? Five minutes? Saying as you did above that "lowering the collective wouldn't do anything for the tail rotor action" speaks volumes of your obvious lack of even the basics of flying helis. Oh yeah? Well explain to me how lowering the collective without reducing power would affect the effect (action) of the tail and improve matters in the scenrio. If anything, lowering collective would result in a reduced load on the rotor system and an INCREASE in rotor speed and a corresponding increase in tail rotor speed, which as you'll recal is no longer controllable, so the net result would be in increase in yaw rate. Lowering collective alone would NOT do anything for the uncontrolled yaw which our intrepid pilot was encountering. BEAVIS, Is there REALLY any need to shout? YOUR ABOVE POST IS SO WRONG AND MISGUIDED THAT I WON'T BOTHER RESPONDING TO YOU ANY FURTHER AFTER THIS ONE. Your choice. BUT DO YOURSELF ONE FAVOR BEFORE YOU AGAIN MAKE AN IDIOT OUT OF YOURSELF HE ASK ANY HELICOPTER PILOT WHO FLYS A SHIP THAT HAS A COUNTER-CLOCKWISE ROTATION MAIN ROTOR WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU LOWER COLLECTIVE? HINT: YOU GET A NICE YAW TO THE LEFT SINCE YOU ARE TAKING TORQUE/POWER OUT OF THE SYSTEM Yes, pretty obvious. AND SO YOU NEED TO APPLY RIGHT PEDAL. Yes.... and your point is? THAT RIGHT PEDAL TAKES THE PITCH/THRUST OUT OF THE TAIL ROTOR. The pilot in the original scenario already had the tail rotor thrust taken out by the failure. He could've pedaled from now 'til eternity and nothing would change. WHEN YOU LOWER COLLECTIVE YOU ARE REDUCING POWER, You are if you also either roll off throttle or the governor does it for you. Otherwise..... MORON. Oh dear... name calling at this early stage? Makes you look somewhat immature don't you think? STOP THINKING THAT POWER IS ONLY REDUCED BY REDUCING ROTOR SPEED. I don't remember mentioning rotor speed, in fact I know I didn't, so if you're going to argue, a least argue with something I said... Power is reduced by reducing power. GO STUDY JUST A BIT. ONE MORE THING, THE FIRST THING MOST PILOT OPERATING HANDBOOKS STATE IS THAT IN THE EVENT OF LOSS OF TAIL ROTOR EFFECTIVENESS IN FLIGHT THE FIRST THING THE PILOT SHOULD DO IS LOWER COLLECTIVE. Is that "MOST" or "ALL"? YOU ARE TRYING TO ARGUE ALGEBRA WITH A MATH PRO WHEN YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T KNOW WHAT 2 PLUS 2 EQUALS. GO BACK TO YOUR TOYS. Oh, now I'm hurt bady. REGARDS, MARK PS HOW MANY PIC HOURS DO YOU HAVE IN HELICOPERS? I'D GUESS ZERO. NO WAIT, I'D GUARANTEE THAT YOU HAVE ZERO. He he Do you think I actually CARE what you "guarantee"? -- Beav Please note my E-mail address is "beavis dot original at ntlworld dot com" (with the obvious changes) Beavisland now lives at www.beavisoriginal.co.uk |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
small prop plane vs helicopter crash statistics | Gregory Lee | Piloting | 1 | June 25th 04 10:34 PM |
helicopter crash in Idaho | Bill Chernoff | Rotorcraft | 0 | April 29th 04 05:49 PM |
Musings of a Commercial Helicopter Pilot | Badwater Bill | Home Built | 6 | February 27th 04 09:11 AM |
Helicopter crash video | James Blakely | Piloting | 17 | December 30th 03 03:21 PM |
Crew Members in Helicopter Crash Identified | Jim Carriere | Naval Aviation | 0 | July 17th 03 06:46 PM |