![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What in-air signals? I had no radio, but even if I had it was clear that the
tug pilot was having an interesting day, so I wouldn't have wanted to distract him. Fortunately this was in East Anglia in the UK, so there was a constant set of fields each about the size of a normal gliding club site. "Shirley" wrote in message ... Chris Reed wrote: We climbed (very slowly) to 400ft and then stayed there while we flew in a straight line at least 3 miles from the airfield. It's the only time I've been field spotting on tow for such a long time. Not suprisingly, I failed to soar once we reached the release height of 2,000 ft Was it not possible for you to use the in-air signals to steer the tow pilot back toward the field? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Reed wrote:
What in-air signals? I had no radio, Well, in the US we have this http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/GB...t/signals.html it was clear that the tug pilot was having an interesting day, so I wouldn't have wanted to distract him. A valid point. Tony V. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From a UK perspective the signals are unexpected! We have one signal from
glider to tug (Can't release) and two from tug to glider (release now, spoilers out). These are the same as the US signals. UK tug pilots are an independent breed - I imagine that trying to tell them where to go could leave you dropped in fierce sink. On the other hand, prior negotiation coupled with flattery can get you to that good thermal (especially if you repay the tow in the bar later on). "Tony Verhulst" wrote in message ... Chris Reed wrote: What in-air signals? I had no radio, Well, in the US we have this http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/GB...t/signals.html it was clear that the tug pilot was having an interesting day, so I wouldn't have wanted to distract him. A valid point. Tony V. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course. When we say 200 feet, it's the first 199 that are
important. As a rule, you should only attempt to land in what you can see up to 200 feet agl. You've already been planning your landing during the tow, now you need only execute. Above 200 feet you have more options, one of which is to recognize the conditions (wind shear, sink, low airspeed, tailwind on takeoff, etc.) which may not favor a rote return to the airfield. But above 200 you can start planning landings to known fields that you cannot see (not necessarily the airport). |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
spaceship one | Pianome | Home Built | 169 | June 30th 04 05:47 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
using winch instead of aerotow | goneill | Soaring | 5 | August 27th 03 02:46 PM |