![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
soarski wrote:
In my country, our gliders move forward because the wing produces thrust, and our sailboats move over the water because the sail produces thrust. Whether we should rule the world is causing much controversy. PLEASE....Readers of the World! This is not in our textbooks! Did someone in the USA write the above??? Wings produce Lift!! A by product of lift is drag! Winglets do also produce lift, and therefore drag. Possibly less than the wing? But you canot call it thrust!....... "Thrust", for the winglet question and my remarks about gliders and sailboats, was used to mean "force in the direction of motion". Apparently, that was an unusual use of the word for some people. Here's an expanded expanation: Gravity is pulling straight down, and so can not propel the glider forward; drag is pulling the glider back, and so can not propel the glider forward. So, what is left to counteract the drag? Lift, produced by the wings. This forward force comes from the lift, which is not vertical, but tipped forward a bit. Look at any diagram showing the forces on a glider, and you will see how the lift, drag, and gravity forces accomplish this. It is not common to call this force moving the glider forward (without it, drag would bring it to stop) "thrust", but the word is sometimes used that way. I still can't answer the original question about the winglets, though. -- ----- Replace "SPAM" with "charter" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:32:36 -0800, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Here's an expanded expanation: Gravity is pulling straight down, and so can not propel the glider forward; drag is pulling the glider back, and so can not propel the glider forward. So, what is left to counteract the drag? Lift, produced by the wings. This forward force comes from the lift, which is not vertical, but tipped forward a bit. Look at any diagram showing the forces on a glider, and you will see how the lift, drag, and gravity forces accomplish this. It is not common to call this force moving the glider forward (without it, drag would bring it to stop) "thrust", but the word is sometimes used that way. Sheesh! So many words and so little knowledge... Here's how it works, guys. For any aircraft in balanced flight, there are four forces acting on it. All forces except gravity act only along the chord or perpendicular to it. Gravity not only produces a force in opposition to lift, but a resultant vector force which can be either thrust or drag, depending on the angle of the chord in respect to earth (gravity). in other words; Gravity is the 'engine' in a glider that produces thrust. For those that don't understand vector force components (or flunked trig), don't worry 'bout it. Simply believe they exist. As for the winglets, they only reduce drag. At the point where the airfoil ends, air rolls to the other side of the wing due to the pressure difference. The rolling air produces a vortex that kinda acts like vacuum cleaner hoses grabbing the trailing tips of the wings. The winglets interfere with the creation of the vortex(s) thus reducing drag. Smaller vortex (smaller vacuum cleaner) means better L/D (slicker ship). LittleJohn Madison, AL |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LittleJohn wrote in message ogy.net...
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:32:36 -0800, Eric Greenwell wrote: Sheesh! So many words and so little knowledge... Here's how it works, guys. For any aircraft in balanced flight, there are four forces acting on it. All forces except gravity act only along the chord or perpendicular to it. Gravity not only produces a force in opposition to lift, it can also produce a force in the same direction to, or perpendicular to lift. 'lift' is the aerodynamic force perpendicular to the direction of motion. It is the horizontal component of lift that turns a banking aircraft, and a vertical, downward lift that allows an aircraft to accelerate in a dive FASTER than the acceleration due to gravity as when the old Hurricanes inverted to keep the fuel flowing into their engines when chasing a diving Messerschmidt. If they dove without inverting first, they'd be chasing that M. in a glider. Weight is the only one of the four forces that is constant in direction is an earth-centered frame of reference. The other three forces may be oriented in any direction though not independently as drag must be opposite to thrust and lift perpendicular to both. Of course these defintions are arbitrary, but other equally arbitrary defintions are less useful. Gravity is the 'engine' in a glider that produces thrust. More like it is the 'fuel', the engine is the wing. -- FF |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "soarski" schreef in bericht om... In my country, our gliders move forward because the wing produces thrust, and our sailboats move over the water because the sail produces thrust. Whether we should rule the world is causing much controversy. In my country (Holland) students will be disqualified from their examination when they make an "interesting" remark like this. Reducing induced drag is what winglets do and gravity is the engine of our gliders. Karel Termaat |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
K.P. Termaat wrote:
"soarski" schreef in bericht om... In my country, our gliders move forward because the wing produces thrust, and our sailboats move over the water because the sail produces thrust. Whether we should rule the world is causing much controversy. In my country (Holland) students will be disqualified from their examination when they make an "interesting" remark like this. Reducing induced drag is what winglets do and gravity is the engine of our gliders. And what produces the "thrust" that moves your sailboats? Gravity? This may be a simple confusion over the word "thrust", which I used (as did the original question) in the sense of "force in the direction of motion". Both the glider and the sailboat are propelled in a forward direction by lift from the wing or sail. -- ----- Replace "SPAM" with "charter" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote in message ...
K.P. Termaat wrote: "soarski" schreef in bericht om... In my country, our gliders move forward because the wing produces thrust, and our sailboats move over the water because the sail produces thrust. Whether we should rule the world is causing much controversy. In my country (Holland) students will be disqualified from their examination when they make an "interesting" remark like this. Reducing induced drag is what winglets do and gravity is the engine of our gliders. And what produces the "thrust" that moves your sailboats? Gravity? This may be a simple confusion over the word "thrust", which I used (as did the original question) in the sense of "force in the direction of motion". Both the glider and the sailboat are propelled in a forward direction by lift from the wing or sail. Not if you _define_ lift as perpendicular to the direction of motion... -- FF |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fred the Red Shirt wrote:
Eric Greenwell wrote in message ... K.P. Termaat wrote: "soarski" schreef in bericht e.com... In my country, our gliders move forward because the wing produces thrust, and our sailboats move over the water because the sail produces thrust. Whether we should rule the world is causing much controversy. In my country (Holland) students will be disqualified from their examination when they make an "interesting" remark like this. Reducing induced drag is what winglets do and gravity is the engine of our gliders. And what produces the "thrust" that moves your sailboats? Gravity? This may be a simple confusion over the word "thrust", which I used (as did the original question) in the sense of "force in the direction of motion". Both the glider and the sailboat are propelled in a forward direction by lift from the wing or sail. Not if you _define_ lift as perpendicular to the direction of motion... True, which was not my intention. What I meant was "horizontal motion", as I said later ("propelled in a forward direction"), thinking as a pilot might as he tries to get somewhere. -- ----- Replace "SPAM" with "charter" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith W wrote:
That's against the laws of thermodynamics. No. Provided the thrust of the winglets is not higher than the drag of the other part of the glider, that's not (and of course the winglet thrust is only a few % of the glider drag) -- Denis Private replies: remove "moncourrielest" from my e-mail address Pour me répondre utiliser l'adresse courriel figurant après moncourrielest" dans mon adresse courriel... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Level 1 AOA clarification | Ramapriya | Piloting | 64 | January 9th 05 01:19 AM |
Space Elevator | Big John | Home Built | 111 | July 21st 04 04:31 PM |
max altitude and Mach 1 | Boomer | Military Aviation | 22 | June 1st 04 08:04 PM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
P-38 Exhaust | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 10 | April 19th 04 07:03 AM |