A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

X-Prize is currently live on Discovery Science Channel



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old October 5th 04, 11:38 PM
Roger Halstead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 11:12:43 -0400, Corky Scott
wrote:

On 5 Oct 2004 05:21:06 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote:

I say it's a fantastic job well done!


So say us all!!

Chuck (former NASA geek) S


It was a great feat, done in typically inventive Rutan fashion. I'm
just having a hard time imagining how it could be of any possible use
to anyone besides Burt Rutan and Richard Branson. Is this to be the
near space equivalent of a carnival thrill ride, albeit a hideously
expensive and extremely dangerous one?

I really do see this as an impressive engineering demonstration, it
just seems so, I don't know, useless. It's like spending millions to
develop a car that can go 2,000 miles per hour. What do you do with
it? Where can you drive it?


The media keep playing this up as opening the door for Tourists, but
it's really a "first step" toward a much less expensive way to get
into space commercially. Only the future knows how far this approach
will be capable of going.

They are only making it to sub orbit at present and to go much
farther, or higher, means a faster re-entry speed and a lot more heat.
The feathering technique is only going to work to a point so they are
eventually going to have to work on more advanced methods of heat
control on re-entry.

Different materials for the outside of the craft, different and
innovative ablative techniques may be just around the corner. Already
there is, or has been some work done on using liquid (water) instead
of the tile used by the shuttle. It's kind of a "weeping wing"
approach that might allow much less expensive materials to be used for
high speed re-entry from high altitude.

Safe space flight, be it NASA or commercial is probably a long way
off.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
Corky Scott


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Red Bull Air Race broadcast live on the web! jvogel Aerobatics 0 August 11th 04 02:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.