![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fredrik Thörnell wrote:
Ian Johnston skrev den 3 Feb 2004 04:55:56 -0800: I am planning to fit a marine aluminium corner cube into the fuselage of the Pirat. It's about 12" on each side, very light, and can be assembled in situ. There more compact reflectors for marine use which are claimed to have larger radar cross sections, but the emphasis has to be on "claimed" there. It'd be interesting to find out what the speed threshold for the doppler radars typically is. Unfortunately, that is not a piece of information they go out of their way to make available. ![]() or below the speed of a glider in a thermal? Cheers, Fred In an air surveillance radar the doppler information (instantaneous radial velocity) is used primarily to reject stationary targets that creep in via the sidelobes (as opposed to a weather radar which is really interested in all the IRV data it can gather). In my experience the doppler clutter threshold was set very low - say 1 or 2 knots. My experience is military, where the cutoff was set as low as possible to counter the postulated "spiral in at low radial velocity" attack, but I believe ATC radar would also have compelling reasons to keep the doppler cutoff very low (don't want tangential targets disappearing on you). Where gliders are likely to disappear is in the processing of multiple radar returns into tracks. A variety of clutter rejection algorithms can be used, and we never used anything quite as simple as "under X knots, throw it out". We did, however, try very hard to eliminate bird tracks, and glider flight patterns obviously have much in common with certain birds. The distinction is between "visible to ATC" and "tracked by ATC" - and we'd really like to be tracked. In short, I don't think there is any simple answer to at what speed a glider will be tracked by ATC. And while I think using a corner reflector to provide a great big RCS is a great idea, I can still imagine the ATC software thinking, "Hmmm, that must be a GREAT BIG hawk out there...". IMHO, Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the Washington, Idaho, Oregon area, we were told (last year, by a
military ATC person briefing us at our contest) about 20% of the big transports have TCAS or equivalent; all new ones get it; old ones are slowly being retrofitted. None of the fighters have it. A couple of years ago, a fighter pilot told me fighters can usually pick up small aircraft on their radar. He didn't comment specifically about when they are flying close to the ground, like the time Chip Garner was hit, or the crop duster fatality we had here several years ago when he was hit a few hundred feet off the ground by a fighter. If you have a transponder, and the transports are flying high enough to show on the radar (here they are often quite low during training), the military ATC will warn them of your presence. Not as good as TCAS on the transport; better than nothing! Twice, I've had two A-10s climb by me at 30 degree angles (not in MOAs, either). I believe they saw me and came up to take a look; I sure hope so, because I don't think there is any way I can see something coming that fast from below me, and so quickly. Gary Evans wrote: Do military aircraft utilize transponder signal based collision avoidance systems? -- ----- change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell skrev den Mon, 02 Feb 2004
09:09:04 -0800: Twice, I've had two A-10s climb by me at 30 degree angles (not in MOAs, either). I believe they saw me and came up to take a look; I sure hope so, because I don't think there is any way I can see something coming that fast from below me, and so quickly. They insist on painting the buggers green, grey and all kinds of strange colours that can't be seen too! We share our field with a helo batallion and the eggbeaters are really hard to pick out against the backdrop of forest! Strange, those military types. Why don't they paint them neon? ![]() Cheers, Fred |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Indiana National Guard pilot killed in midair collision | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 17th 04 08:08 PM |
Aviation Consumer and Collision Avoidance | BHelman | Products | 52 | April 23rd 04 05:35 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Naval Aviation | 8 | September 15th 03 05:07 PM |
"China blamed in '01 air collision" | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 2 | September 14th 03 06:08 PM |