A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nearly Mid-Air Collision at Estrella



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 4th 04, 06:50 PM
Dave Houlton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Fredrik Thörnell wrote:
Ian Johnston skrev den 3 Feb 2004 04:55:56 -0800:

I am planning to fit a marine aluminium corner cube into the fuselage
of the Pirat. It's about 12" on each side, very light, and can be
assembled in situ. There more compact reflectors for marine use which
are claimed to have larger radar cross sections, but the emphasis has
to be on "claimed" there.



It'd be interesting to find out what the speed threshold for the doppler
radars typically is. Unfortunately, that is not a piece of information
they go out of their way to make available. The question is, above
or below the speed of a glider in a thermal?

Cheers,
Fred


In an air surveillance radar the doppler information (instantaneous
radial velocity) is used primarily to reject stationary targets that
creep in via the sidelobes (as opposed to a weather radar which is
really interested in all the IRV data it can gather). In my experience
the doppler clutter threshold was set very low - say 1 or 2 knots. My
experience is military, where the cutoff was set as low as possible to
counter the postulated "spiral in at low radial velocity" attack, but I
believe ATC radar would also have compelling reasons to keep the doppler
cutoff very low (don't want tangential targets disappearing on you).

Where gliders are likely to disappear is in the processing of multiple
radar returns into tracks. A variety of clutter rejection algorithms
can be used, and we never used anything quite as simple as "under X
knots, throw it out". We did, however, try very hard to eliminate bird
tracks, and glider flight patterns obviously have much in common with
certain birds. The distinction is between "visible to ATC" and "tracked
by ATC" - and we'd really like to be tracked.

In short, I don't think there is any simple answer to at what speed a
glider will be tracked by ATC. And while I think using a corner
reflector to provide a great big RCS is a great idea, I can still
imagine the ATC software thinking, "Hmmm, that must be a GREAT BIG hawk
out there...".

IMHO,
Dave
  #3  
Old February 2nd 04, 05:09 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In the Washington, Idaho, Oregon area, we were told (last year, by a
military ATC person briefing us at our contest) about 20% of the big
transports have TCAS or equivalent; all new ones get it; old ones are
slowly being retrofitted. None of the fighters have it. A couple of
years ago, a fighter pilot told me fighters can usually pick up small
aircraft on their radar. He didn't comment specifically about when they
are flying close to the ground, like the time Chip Garner was hit, or
the crop duster fatality we had here several years ago when he was hit a
few hundred feet off the ground by a fighter.

If you have a transponder, and the transports are flying high enough to
show on the radar (here they are often quite low during training), the
military ATC will warn them of your presence. Not as good as TCAS on the
transport; better than nothing!

Twice, I've had two A-10s climb by me at 30 degree angles (not in MOAs,
either). I believe they saw me and came up to take a look; I sure hope
so, because I don't think there is any way I can see something coming
that fast from below me, and so quickly.

Gary Evans wrote:
Do military aircraft utilize transponder signal based
collision avoidance systems?


--
-----
change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

  #4  
Old February 2nd 04, 05:19 PM
Fredrik Thörnell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eric Greenwell skrev den Mon, 02 Feb 2004
09:09:04 -0800:
Twice, I've had two A-10s climb by me at 30 degree angles (not in MOAs,
either). I believe they saw me and came up to take a look; I sure hope
so, because I don't think there is any way I can see something coming
that fast from below me, and so quickly.


They insist on painting the buggers green, grey and all kinds of strange
colours that can't be seen too! We share our field with a helo batallion
and the eggbeaters are really hard to pick out against the backdrop of
forest!

Strange, those military types. Why don't they paint them neon?

Cheers,
Fred
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Indiana National Guard pilot killed in midair collision Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 June 17th 04 08:08 PM
Aviation Consumer and Collision Avoidance BHelman Products 52 April 23rd 04 05:35 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
"China blamed in '01 air collision" Mike Yared Naval Aviation 8 September 15th 03 05:07 PM
"China blamed in '01 air collision" Mike Yared Military Aviation 2 September 14th 03 06:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.