A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Spin



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 7th 04, 06:24 PM
Bill Daniels
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mark James Boyd" wrote in message
news:40252327$1@darkstar...

I actually really also liked the discussion about how longer
towropes allow an abort where the glider doesn't ram into the
back of the tug, too...


A longer rope will just move the tug further down the runway where he has
even less room. I'm pretty comfortable with 250 foot ropes. A tuggie
always has the right to abort a takeoff roll any time being on the ground
will be preferable to being in the air. What I would like is a review of
the runway abort procedures. As far as I know, the following is not in the
"How to be a Tuggie" comic book.

The first step is for the tug to release the rope - that gives the glider
pilot the unmistakable sign that this is an abort. Just as in the air, the
tug must turn left and the glider right. There may be room to leave the
runway completely or just move as far to the edge as safety allows. If
there are runway lights, there may be clearance for the tug wing to pass
over them - use all the room available. The tug should try to maintain
speed and not brake until reaching the departure end of the runway or when
it's clear that a collision is not possible.

Again, you see why I like winch launch.

Bill Daniels

  #3  
Old February 8th 04, 06:37 PM
BAToulson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Janos Bauer
writes:

What are the standards altitudes for such incident? Here are the list
I learnt: 50 straight landing, 50&100 one 180 degree turn, 180 two
turns or small circle. Of course in strong wind I would increase these
values.


Best rules, and those now taught in the UK are, if you can land safely ahead,
then you should do so.

Heights are not a good guide as they can mislead you into all sorts of trouble.
The higher the wind, the greater the land ahead opportunities up to heights
well above those where it is clearly safe to do a reasonably normal short
circuit. The tricky situation on a short run is a hot, nil wind day when the
margin between landing ahead and adequate height for a short circuit is very
narrow.

However, the GOLDEN RULE is first fly the aeroplane. i.e if both options are
marginal, recover from nose high and get into stable flight at correct speed,
then assess your options. there is usually ample time.

Barney
UK
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
SR22 Spin Recovery gwengler Piloting 9 September 24th 04 07:31 AM
Spin Training Captain Wubba Piloting 25 April 12th 04 02:11 PM
Cessna 150 Price Outlook Charles Talleyrand Owning 80 October 16th 03 02:18 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.