![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Silver
http://www.pia.com/silver/ We only send our parachutes to him. He is still repacking and making belts. This thread is making me wonder about if it was a good idea to get rid of that crotch strap. Garret |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use a 4-point for positive G (only) aerobatics and have
found that with the shoulder harnesses placed at the right height, a fairly firm cushion, and the belts tightened REAL tight, I feel VERY secure. For me setting up cushions and chute and harnesses in such a way that I have excellent reach for everything, excellent vis, and am yet quite snugly held in seems to make me feel secure. I have a little trouble resnugging if I have to shift or unbuckle momentarily, but it only seems to take a few tries to get it back. Ommitting for the moment the idea that perhaps 5 or 6 points might be better, I wonder how important snugging it up is instead. I've always assumed that very tight is better than not, but haven't really heard much opinion. There was some cushion discussion a while back and I have a fairly thick, fairly firm cushion now (fortunately I'm quite short so no canopy issues). But what about snugging tight? Anyone with thoughts or stories? In article , Martin Gregorie wrote: On 6 Jun 2004 16:55:50 GMT, Ian Cant wrote: The 'crotch strap' is what used to be known as a 'negative-G' strap. Usually it works to keep your skull away from the canopy during the bumpy bits of sky; rarely, it helps you in a crash by preventing submarining. However, a single strap is both inconvenient and potentially painful. A better design is a double strap, like an -- ------------+ Mark Boyd Avenal, California, USA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Jun 2004 19:50:01 +0100, Martin Gregorie
wrote: Are our 5-point rotary action quick-release units the same as the car racing gang use? Following myself up: I've just been speaking to Willans Harnesses (both the Stockbridge Racing operation and Willans Harnesses, the division that used to do glider harnesses). Stockbridge said that under no circumstances would they sell any of their harnesses or upgrades for gliding use and quoted both certification and product liability as the reasons for this. Willans Harnesses do custom harnesses and tree climbing equipment and used to make gliding harnesses. They no longer do glider harnesses in any shape or form because the cost and time involved in obtaining JAR certification was so great that they saw no nett benefit to themselves in obtaining it. It appears that Schroth is currently the only game in town on this side of the pond. -- martin@ : Martin Gregorie gregorie : Harlow, UK demon : co : Zappa fan & glider pilot uk : |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Martin Gregorie" wrote in message ... Willans Harnesses do custom harnesses and tree climbing equipment and used to make gliding harnesses. They no longer do glider harnesses in any shape or form because the cost and time involved in obtaining JAR certification was so great that they saw no nett benefit to themselves in obtaining it. Martin. These belts do not conform to the TSO from the FAA either. It's an American process to allow and document minor alterations to the glider on a form 337 for Type Certificated aircraft. There may be a similar process available to you poor souls across the pond. Ask you administrator (I don't know what you call them) or the BGA if there is a process similar to a Form 337/field approval for you to follow. I suspect that there is. The JAR regs are so close to the FAA regs in most regards that I suspect you can get it accomplished. Scott. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For me six point harness is far preferable to a five
point one which would simply be impossible for long flights. The borrowed Std Cirrus I fly at present has a non-approved 6 point harness designed for race car use that uses a 4 point buckle and no additional attachment points. I think it is a little different from that described in the earlier post. The shoulder and lap straps are as normal except that there is a strong metal ring attached to the top of each lap strap about 3 inches lateral to the buckle. The 4th and 5 straps are attached by metal clips under the seat pan to the fuselage (not seat pan) mounted attachment points also used for the lap straps. The upper, business, end of the 2 thigh straps is a loop not a buckle. The straps run forward and medially under the seat pan for about 8 inches and emerge through slit shaped cut outs in the seat pan under the inside of each upper thigh - giving virtual attachment points there. With only the laps straps buckled the left thigh strap comes inside and over the thigh to the metal ring over the top of the thigh, through it and then turns upwards and inwards towards the top of the buckle area. Then the metal tongue of the left left shoulder strap is inserted throught the thigh strap loop and into the buckle. Same on the right. This arrangement pulls down on the lap strap assembly from the top strap's tongue but the extra straps come in at an angle from the side and do not cover the buckle. When the buckle is undone the shoulder straps are instantly free of the 4th and 5th straps which just fall away through the metal loops on the lap straps. When we first looked at the glider we did not understand that the extra straps attached to the shoulder straps and thought they were suppsed to attach to the lap straps which would not have been easy to get out of in a hurry. I only refitted the extra straps today as a result of thinking about this thread and it seems to work really well. I feel secured firmly in the seat pan and can't slide forward. The lap straps are held well down in place and at last I don't have to feel squashed down by shoulder straps - which can be safely left comfortable. I will be able to pee no problem too. I recall from attempts to get six point straps fitted to a new glider about 3 years ago that the manufacturer's view was that it was impossible for them as there were no LBA approved 6 point straps. Damn shame. John Galloway |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Excellent post Ed....thanks for sharing it with us. I hope that you are
doing well. I remember Chip showing us his system years ago when flying at Mid Atlantic Soaring. My only concern is the same that was posted back when this all was discussed in 1998....that is if the belts will withstand the loads placed upon them at angles that they were not designed for when using the system described by Chip. Does anyone have any further info about this? You out there Chip? I know that he was concerned re the liability issue of non-approved applications in the past so may not be willing to discuss this publicly. I have a crotch strap installed by myself in my experimental certificated glider (LS-8) but honestly only use it when on a fast final glide to keep my head from being bruised i.e. most of the flight it is not connected for relief reasons. It obviously wouldn't be much help laying there in the seat just prior to impacting something. Casey Lenox KC Phoenix |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kilo Charlie" wrote in message news
I remember Chip showing us his system years ago when flying at Mid Atlantic Soaring. My only concern is the same that was posted back when this all was discussed in 1998....that is if the belts will withstand the loads placed upon them at angles that they were not designed for when using the system described by Chip. Does anyone have any further info about this? You out there Chip? I know that he was concerned re the liability issue of non-approved applications in the past so may not be willing to discuss this publicly. I still use my 6-point harness, the details of which I discussed in a previous posting. Ed Byars' thoughtful email prompted me to look for it. Cut and paste this URL into your browser window. You may have to remove any hard carriage returns that have been inserted into the long address: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gr...aol.com&rnum=1 My concern about modifying harnesses in a certified aircraft remains, not just for regulatory reasons but also because you're touching a piece of safety-related equipment that can carry high loads and has the potential to save your life and/or injure you, as Tim Mara has previously noted on this forum. As Casey notes, many 6-point installations (including mine) use the seat belt attach points to anchor the thigh straps, too. I agree this raises a question about loads being applied with different vectors than they were designed for. On the other hand, approximately 50% of the load on the extra harness straps is fed into the central buckle which has the shoulder harness restraining it, so it's not as bad as it first seems. I'd welcome any comments from more authoritative sources. In one update since I wrote the above email, several pilots have assured me that their 6-point harnesses work just as well as a 5-point harness (i.e., with a crotch strap) for turbulent ridge running. I was a little dubious but, having never used a crotch strap, I have no first-hand knowledge. Chip Bearden |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ED
Glad you're doing well. I am curious--did the crotch strap attach point fail, or was it intact after the crash? If it did fail, at what estimated load did that occur? Pehaps it does not have to hold the entire load to be effective--your thoughts? Thanks Hartley Falbaum "Ed Byars" wrote in message hlink.net... I sent the following to our magazine nine months ago and didn't receive an acknowledgement or receipt. I guess it was not suitable for them so I thought I would share it with ras to maybe provoke some safety discussion. efb10-11-03-rev.6-5-04 You may be interested in my latest crotch strap experience. I'm still analyzing my June 2003 accident and the cause. More later on this. The role of the crotch strap is significant and worthy of mention. The last half dozen gliders I've had I added a crotch strap (usually available from Wings & Wheels), which easily clicks into the bottom, front or 5th slot of the standard Gadringer belt hardware. I secure the other end, which terminates with the belt into a triangular link, with a quarter inch hole that I bolt to the seat pan with a large "wood" washer behind the seat pan. My gliders are Experimental category so this is legal. I always heard that the main purpose of a crotch strap was to keep the lap belt across the upper thighs and prevent it sliding up to the stomach area. I have since learned better. It of course depends on the direction of the accident loads and the direction of the inertia of the body as to how all restraint straps come into play. Many glider accidents involve "dropping in" vertically wherein the tailbone (in the L-1, L-2 area) or higher are damaged so the belts don't help much. You seldom see accidents with lap belt overload, but it happens. I have a sad memory of helping remove a dead friend from an inverted Ventus cockpit where the lap belts on both sides had pulled lose from the seat pan. Fortunately rare but it happens. In my "incident" the nose of the glider hit hard ground at about a 60 plus degree angle. The "load" was about along the longitudinal axis of the glider. Since in our modern gliders (ASW-28 in my case) we recline (sit supine), the inertia of my body was toward the nose with only the crotch strap to resist. Actually Waibel designed the seat pan to take some of this forward load against the bottom of the thighs. In this seating the knees are bent more upward. The nose of the glider (along with my feet) was crushed in a calculated energy-absorbing manner. Thank you Gerhardt Waibel! I think his design and the crotch strap saved my knees. I was conscious and lucid until the helicopter dropped me off at the Medical College of Georgia Trauma Center. After that I really was not with it for a couple of weeks, but after that time I suddenly noticed that my groin area was still quite swollen. I realized that my crotch area had sustained a significant load and that all things considered had kept my body from moving more forward and no doubt helped minimize the leg/knee damage. I had no shoulder strap or lap belt marks or soreness. Since my guess is that a significant number of glider accidents impose loads and body reactions similar to mine, I recommend a crotch strap. Trying to distribute the load to the pelvic area by wearing an athletic "cup" may be good for some flights, but for some flights there are other disadvantages. Many contest pilots regularly wear a male external catheter and I don't think both would work. With just the crotch strap I always had to be careful that the strap was adjusted somewhat to the right, was not too tight, and did not interfere with the flow from the catheter that was to the left. I suggest reading Chip Bearden's posting which appeared in the rec.aviation.soaring newsgroup on Nov.20 1998 which outlines a more complex but better seat belt design. I hope this discussion will create more thought about glider accident safety. Ed Byars |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Hartley,
The crotch strap remained intact after doing it's job. I'm just lucky that no serious permanent damage was done to my sensitive genitals. I like the ideas presented relative to a six point arrangement. This sure sounds safer, but any sensible arrangement would be virtually impossible to get by the LBA/FAA. It's a shame that it's not likely that any competent person or group would/will develop and offer for sale such a glider system. Our legal system just would not allow it. Maybe such a system designed for another more numerous vehicle, auto probably, might be available for Experimental licensed gliders. From an overall safety standpoint it may be just as important to assure that any belting system is quickly free of the body with one quick push or twist. We must not forget that provision for a quick cockpit egress may be just as important. I'm pleased that this thread seems to have made a few of us review our restraint system and think about possible improvement. Ed Byars "HL Falbaum" wrote in message news ![]() ED Glad you're doing well. I am curious--did the crotch strap attach point fail, or was it intact after the crash? If it did fail, at what estimated load did that occur? Pehaps it does not have to hold the entire load to be effective--your thoughts? Thanks Hartley Falbaum "Ed Byars" wrote in message hlink.net... I sent the following to our magazine nine months ago and didn't receive an acknowledgement or receipt. I guess it was not suitable for them so I thought I would share it with ras to maybe provoke some safety discussion. efb10-11-03-rev.6-5-04 You may be interested in my latest crotch strap experience. I'm still analyzing my June 2003 accident and the cause. More later on this. The role of the crotch strap is significant and worthy of mention. The last half dozen gliders I've had I added a crotch strap (usually available from Wings & Wheels), which easily clicks into the bottom, front or 5th slot of the standard Gadringer belt hardware. I secure the other end, which terminates with the belt into a triangular link, with a quarter inch hole that I bolt to the seat pan with a large "wood" washer behind the seat pan. My gliders are Experimental category so this is legal. I always heard that the main purpose of a crotch strap was to keep the lap belt across the upper thighs and prevent it sliding up to the stomach area. I have since learned better. It of course depends on the direction of the accident loads and the direction of the inertia of the body as to how all restraint straps come into play. Many glider accidents involve "dropping in" vertically wherein the tailbone (in the L-1, L-2 area) or higher are damaged so the belts don't help much. You seldom see accidents with lap belt overload, but it happens. I have a sad memory of helping remove a dead friend from an inverted Ventus cockpit where the lap belts on both sides had pulled lose from the seat pan. Fortunately rare but it happens. In my "incident" the nose of the glider hit hard ground at about a 60 plus degree angle. The "load" was about along the longitudinal axis of the glider. Since in our modern gliders (ASW-28 in my case) we recline (sit supine), the inertia of my body was toward the nose with only the crotch strap to resist. Actually Waibel designed the seat pan to take some of this forward load against the bottom of the thighs. In this seating the knees are bent more upward. The nose of the glider (along with my feet) was crushed in a calculated energy-absorbing manner. Thank you Gerhardt Waibel! I think his design and the crotch strap saved my knees. I was conscious and lucid until the helicopter dropped me off at the Medical College of Georgia Trauma Center. After that I really was not with it for a couple of weeks, but after that time I suddenly noticed that my groin area was still quite swollen. I realized that my crotch area had sustained a significant load and that all things considered had kept my body from moving more forward and no doubt helped minimize the leg/knee damage. I had no shoulder strap or lap belt marks or soreness. Since my guess is that a significant number of glider accidents impose loads and body reactions similar to mine, I recommend a crotch strap. Trying to distribute the load to the pelvic area by wearing an athletic "cup" may be good for some flights, but for some flights there are other disadvantages. Many contest pilots regularly wear a male external catheter and I don't think both would work. With just the crotch strap I always had to be careful that the strap was adjusted somewhat to the right, was not too tight, and did not interfere with the flow from the catheter that was to the left. I suggest reading Chip Bearden's posting which appeared in the rec.aviation.soaring newsgroup on Nov.20 1998 which outlines a more complex but better seat belt design. I hope this discussion will create more thought about glider accident safety. Ed Byars |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ed Byars" wrote in message Hi Hartley, The crotch strap remained intact after doing it's job. I'm just lucky that no serious permanent damage was done to my sensitive genitals. I like the ideas presented relative to a six point arrangement. This sure sounds safer, but any sensible arrangement would be virtually impossible to get by the LBA/FAA. SNIPPED Ed. Installing the belts in a sailplane is an exceptionally simple procedure. If experimental, just do it. If certified, file a 337 and get the field approval for the airplane you stick it in. Its quite simple to do and I haven't met a MIDO guy that didn't stamp it off immediately and wonder why they weren't there to begin with. Scott. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
eScrew zen story | [email protected] | Owning | 0 | December 20th 04 07:19 AM |
Funny story about naval | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 20th 04 03:37 AM |
Funny story about piloting | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | December 20th 04 12:34 AM |
Amazing, True Story and Lessons | jsmith | Piloting | 5 | March 24th 04 03:32 PM |
PFC Lynch gets a Bronze Star? | Brian | Military Aviation | 77 | August 2nd 03 11:15 AM |