A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance World Class design proposal



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 2nd 04, 04:52 PM
Ben Flewett
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

' Perhaps DG, who has taken over the assets of LS but
doesn't want to
produce the LS4, could be persuaded to transmit the
production rights
to a manufacturer in a low-wages country? '


This is not a good idea. The problem is retaining
the build quality to a level such that performance
does not vary from glider to glider (otherwise the
point of a mono type class is lost). The build quality
of the PW5 is so poor that variations between gliders
can easily be seen with a cursory glance.

If you want a glider built properly - pay the Germans
to do it. Everyone else gets it wrong.

I am a huge fan of making the LS4 the world class glider
but please don't lets stuff it up by having them built
too cheaply.

Ben.

PS. If you want proof look at the bits that Schempp
outsourced - the Duo Discus wing and the D2 rudder.


At 08:06 02 September 2004, Gldcomp wrote:
Stephanevdv,

The problem with club class is that it's in no way
a monotype class, and
that given the problems with handicapping, there will
never be a true
equality between participants. (..............)

I don't know where you get your info, but :
1) There is no handicap in the World Class competitions.
2)Yes, the PW-5 is a true monotype for olympic specs
: design is public
domain, manufacturable in any part of the world.
You can get full detailed copy of plans and dimensions
yourself from the
Univesity of Varsaw.

Perhaps DG, who has taken over the assets of LS but
doesn't want to
produce the LS4, could be persuaded to transmit the
production rights
to a manufacturer in a low-wages country? With all
the LS4's already
flying, it would make a great monotype Word Class
glider...

Any glider Manufactured by ONE company is not public
domain and not
manufacturable in any part of the world

--
stephanevdv
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-------

Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au
]
- A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when,
why, or what they

fly -







  #2  
Old September 2nd 04, 08:35 PM
Vorsanger1
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ben Flewett wrote

"If you want a glider built properly - pay the Germans to do it. Everyone else
gets it wrong."

I believe that some DGs are built in Slovenia. Also, what about the quality of
the LAKs, CZs, and some others which are not built in Germany. Does that make
them c..p? Finally, although we are moving away from gliders, VW is having a
real QC problem evidenced by increased customer complaints and dropping sales.
Yet they are built in Germany. Perhaps it's the fault of the foreign workers
there !

Cheers, Charles
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing Boondoggle Larry Dighera Military Aviation 77 September 15th 04 03:39 AM
Region 7 contest attracts former Open Class World Champion Rich Carlson Soaring 2 May 14th 04 07:04 AM
World Class: Recent Great News Charles Yeates Soaring 58 March 19th 04 07:58 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 04:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.