![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In this the era of the telecommuter...when information
can be readily transmitted without being present...we would want the office somewhere expensive so that the employees can commute on crowded highways? A friend recently queried me of where a good place to move near a major population center for soaring might be...although these exist, many or only a couple of pranged towplanes away from not being present. I think this topic can wither on the vine...Hobbs may not be perfect, but it makes sense in a lot of ways. At 09:30 08 January 2005, F.L. Whiteley wrote: 'snoop' wrote in message oups.com... One bit of EAA history that I do know is that when Poberenzy wanted to expand out of the Hales Corner building, he only wanted to build a bigger version of the Hales Corner corrugated hangar. The board pushed to look further into the future and thus the beautiful museum that is in Oshkosh exists. Our library at the SSA headquarters consists of a couple walls of book shelves, with boxes full of books sitting on the floor. Imagine our offices, let's say in a suburb of Denver, or Dallas, or in Mr. Greenwells location. Can you see all those soaring people visiting day in and day out, volunteering their talent and time. Imagine guys like Dick Johnson, in Dallas being able to visit and help out with history projects whenever he wanted to. See where this is going. Imagine Charlie, and Charlie lite getting on a non-stop flight straight into DFW, or DEN, or ABQ, or wherever, and in twenty minutes being at headquarters. More thoughts? Soaring history is really archived at NSM and starting at the SWSM. The SSA staff probably doesn't need hangar talk from a bunch of well meaning, but likely annoying drop-ins. If you have volunteered and coordinated to work on a specific project, by all means, do it, but if you want to put energy into growing soaring, try your own backyard first. Growing soaring happens at the grass roots level. I joined my first club (I already had an interest and had taken a soaring flight) when I noticed their black on hot pink 8.5 x 11 poster on the bulletin board of the local USAF post office. It simply stated 'We reckon if you can drive a car, you can fly a glider' and had a graphic on an SHK (serial nr 1, of which I later owned a share) and the club name and contact details. I was there mid-week after I got a car only to find they flew normally at the weekends. But I was back 9am on the Saturday. I see no pressing need to move the SSA to a higher cost of living area when the budget is so tight. Turning it around financially will take some time. Please login to the member area and review the ex-Com and board minutes and review the eNewsLetter or copies of the Dennis' Missile. Frank Whiteley |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stewart Kissel wrote:
In this the era of the telecommuter...when information can be readily transmitted without being present...we would want the office somewhere expensive so that the employees can commute on crowded highways? The reason that AOPA is in Frederick, Maryland, is because it's close to Washington DC. While transmitting data can do much, there's a lot to be said for "pressing the flesh" when the occasion requires it. Access to legislators is a lot easier from Frederick than from Hobbs. Tony V. http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Verhulst" wrote in message ... Stewart Kissel wrote: In this the era of the telecommuter...when information can be readily transmitted without being present...we would want the office somewhere expensive so that the employees can commute on crowded highways? The reason that AOPA is in Frederick, Maryland, is because it's close to Washington DC. While transmitting data can do much, there's a lot to be said for "pressing the flesh" when the occasion requires it. Access to legislators is a lot easier from Frederick than from Hobbs. Tony V. http://home.comcast.net/~verhulst/SOARING Although that is a compeling reason, SSA can't afford the lunch tabs, nor the rent or staff. Might be much cheaper to hire a lobbyist (part-time). Frank Whiteley |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() snoop wrote: Looking through all the posts from earlier this year, regarding the sliding membership in our US soaring activities, along with all the other trailing bad news, i.e. SSA building in need of big repairs, there is no soaring operation in Hobbs, I'm curious about thoughts of "what if the SSA became a division of the EAA, similar to the Vintage, Classic, Warbird divisions of the EAA. Two big airshow/conventions a year, EAA publishes all magazines, and a lot of members at those fly-ins and airshows to ask the question "where can I start". Plus lobbying power, and unlimited networking. Just curious for thoughts. About declining membership: SSA Board and Hobbs staff have been working hard on reversing the declining membership in SSA. This has been approached to a great extent by working toward retention of members, including personal letters to many lapsed members asking why they have left. Dinner conversation with my director brought up that SSA has had some success this year in this effort. Membership as of 12/31/04 was 12,617 compared to 12,305. It is a good sign when you can reverse a bad trend. There are no simple answers, but hard work does pay off as shown above. Let's go get some more folks involved and try to keep the ones we have. UH |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith,
I read your mesages about your club and I feel your pain. I went to a particular club all one summer and got 20 minutes flying time due to some "Catch 22" rules. Did it make me quit... no. Did it make me appreciate a good club even more... YES!!! If you're not getting any more than that out of it, maybe you need to change clubs. I will say the soaring today in the U.S. would be nothing without volunteer labor. I hate to continue to elevate Texas Soaring Association to some plateau that others won't be able to achieve, but as wealthy as the club is, there greatest asset is the membership. That group, that I'm proud to say I was once a member of, has the talent to do about anything they need to get done. Their Pawnees are stunning. Their gliders are well maintained. Their facilities are wonderful. I am very encouraged about the Soaring Club of Houston. I did quite a bit of work since joining in July. I haven't flown much but that's about to change, since I just got my own ship. I will continue to work to build this club to one day match what I know is possible. Not tooting my own horn, but just trying to encourage others, including Keith, not to give up. If you're not getting what you think you need out of it, examine your situation and fix it. If it means going to another club, GO! Tell others about soaring. Take them up if possible. You never know where the next really great club member is going to come from. Our average age is getting older, and our numbers are dwindling. It takes someone special to be a glider pilot, in my opinion. Those folks are out there, though, and we're not reaching them. Again, I think SSA and local clubs should do an R/C day and invite the local R/C Soaring groups out for a demo ride and a cookout. They already love soaring... Lots of work for some... yep... it's worth it to continue this greatest of aviation advantures... (hahaha, waxing poetic here... not bad for an old West Texas Bumpkin.) Chin up! GO FLY!!! TELL SOMEONE HOW TERRIFIC IT IS!!!!!! Jack Womack |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Practice what you preach...... OK, I will. I have proposed such a day
for my group and have polled the R/C club to see who's interested. I want to have some numbers before I porpose this to the club. I'll see how it goes and report back as this progresses. Jack Womack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why is Soaring declining | f.blair | Soaring | 266 | February 7th 09 12:58 PM |
Revisiting lapse rates (From: How high is that cloud?) | Icebound | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | November 26th 04 09:41 PM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Opinions on ICAS membership? | Wright1902Glider | Aerobatics | 0 | January 3rd 04 03:31 PM |
Club Membership: Getting for what one's wished | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 11 | October 18th 03 04:18 AM |