![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without giving too much away............ (yuk yuk yuk)
One can always post your questions at: http://www.vibinst.org/default.htm and usually somebody will be happy to answer. Phase indicators can be a variety of schemes or devices. Proximity probes, and notch. Strobe light. Magnetic interrupter. Photocell. Even the old proverbial pencil and masking tape! Kent Felkins Tulsa |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Strangely enough, that is what I *DID* for a living when Spectral Dynamics
was the industry leader in machinery diagnostics. Unfortunately, my job was the circuit design, not the diagnostics itself, so all I concerned myself with was the black box that took a defined input and produced a defined output. There are times I wish that I had transferred to the applications department. They were the ones that seemed to have the most fun (and the most three martini Friday lunches). Jim " Stangely enough, this is what I do for a living. No kidding. I am an engineer at Bently Nevada, Corp, the industry leader in machinery diagnostics. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Strangely enough, that is what I *DID* for a living when Spectral Dynamics was the industry leader in machinery diagnostics. Unfortunately, my job was the circuit design, not the diagnostics itself, so all I concerned myself with was the black box that took a defined input and produced a defined output. There are times I wish that I had transferred to the applications department. They were the ones that seemed to have the most fun (and the most three martini Friday lunches). Jim LOL. I've been an engineer designing in the dark many times. Fortunately at Bently, there is a large effort to train engineers in diagnostics. Then we can use personal experience in addition to requirements documents when designing a new product. Or, at least, we can determine if requirements make sense! Adam |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Understood. What I started out to do (and still plan on doing) is to have a
device that will stay permanently mounted to the engine that can be calibrated (adjusted, signed, pick a verb) when the engine is known to be good and light a "your engine is about to come apart" lamp at the appropriate time. What this group seems to be leaning toward is a lab quality device that will allow for sophisticated diagnostics. That ain't the thrust of my Kitplanes columns. KISS and BURP. Jim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Understood. What I started out to do (and still plan on doing) is to have a device that will stay permanently mounted to the engine that can be calibrated (adjusted, signed, pick a verb) when the engine is known to be good and light a "your engine is about to come apart" lamp at the appropriate time. What this group seems to be leaning toward is a lab quality device that will allow for sophisticated diagnostics. That ain't the thrust of my Kitplanes columns. KISS and BURP. Jim As is tradition, we tend to get off topic ;-) I think you can accomplish this using the methods discussed. Mount 2 proximity probes 90 degrees apart. Calibrate the readings for normal low vibrations (be sure to account for any nonlinearities in the probe). Design the circuit to trip the buzzer/lamp when the vibration exceeds the normal level. You may need some analog circuitry to help (gain, etc). But you don't need to get much fancier than that. Adam |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Proximity probes? Or accelerometers?
I understand about the analog circuitry and actually plan on making a five or six channel filter at each of the possible resonance points relative to the fundamental ... and then strobing the filters to light a "normal", "low", "high" lamp for each channel. Jim As is tradition, we tend to get off topic ;-) I think you can accomplish this using the methods discussed. Mount 2 proximity probes 90 degrees apart. Calibrate the readings for normal low vibrations (be sure to account for any nonlinearities in the probe). Design the circuit to trip the buzzer/lamp when the vibration exceeds the normal level. You may need some analog circuitry to help (gain, etc). But you don't need to get much fancier than that. Adam |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RST Engineering" wrote in message
... Understood. What I started out to do (and still plan on doing) is to have a device that will stay permanently mounted to the engine that can be calibrated (adjusted, signed, pick a verb) when the engine is known to be good and light a "your engine is about to come apart" lamp at the appropriate time. Excuse my ignorance, but couldn't you just feel the vibrations? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you wait that long, you're probably more concerned if the chain that's
holding the motor to the firewall is going to break after the motor cuts loose from the mounts. All too often, the vibrations start to pick up seconds or miliseconds before a catastrophic failure. To do such a health-monitoring function properly, you really want some seeded fault data to characterize what a "bad" engine spectrum looks like. How many engines do you want to sacrifice to get the data? You can approach it from the "anything different from a healthy engine signature" standpoint, but that will likely result in a ton of false positive fault indications. "LCT Paintball" wrote in message news:_Lq0e.14520$fn3.9681@attbi_s01... "RST Engineering" wrote in message ... Understood. What I started out to do (and still plan on doing) is to have a device that will stay permanently mounted to the engine that can be calibrated (adjusted, signed, pick a verb) when the engine is known to be good and light a "your engine is about to come apart" lamp at the appropriate time. Excuse my ignorance, but couldn't you just feel the vibrations? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Vibration Monitor (Hyde, Wanttaja?) | RST Engineering | Home Built | 71 | April 4th 05 04:44 PM |
Pinging Ron Wanttaja - "Unporting?" | Bob Chilcoat | Home Built | 13 | November 24th 04 07:28 PM |
Vibration Testing | Jim Weir | Home Built | 20 | October 10th 04 07:22 AM |
Vibration Testing | Jim Weir | Owning | 21 | October 10th 04 07:22 AM |
Survey - 3 blade prop conversion- Cockpit vibration, happy or not | Fly | Owning | 20 | June 30th 04 05:32 PM |