![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mike!
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:51:10 -0800, Mike 'Flyin'8' wrote: Dave, Thanks for your input! So if I mount the AM1000 on the Yoke, it does not block any of the instruments in the cockpit? I am 5' 9" , partner is 6'4". He says no, the knob on the mount blocks the 0 -800 RPM portion of the tach for me if I sit perfectly straight..shift my head to the right an inch or two, and my answer is no as well... When you turn the Yoke, does the AM1000 stay vertically aligned, or does it turn with the yoke? It turns with the yoke.. Since the AM500 and AM1000 are pretty much the same unit (Except for size) Is the extra $200 a good trade off for screen size? Yes, absolutely for us... I have not seen either of these units in person so I am not sure how dramatic the difference on the screen is... I drew out two boxes that are the exact size of the units, and the AM1000 is quite a bit bigger... I am certainly leaning toward either the AM500 or AM1000, but trying to justify the money in my head... If the AM500 does exactly what I want, and the screen/button size is usable then I would be happy. If however, the buttons are too small to be easily used during flight, then I would be very disappointed. My currrent solution is jsut not working... The PDA using GPS software and a CF card. It is just not practical. How the heck am I supposed to use the little stylus during flight... :-) I don't know either... the AM 1000 has large widely spaced buttons, easily reached with your thumbs while firmly holding the yoke. We tried several, and the most difficult was a Garmin 196 mounted at arms length in the center of the panel. OK on the ground, but in rough air, just try to push a small (correct) button at arms length with you (and your hand) moving opposite to the panel in rough conditions. Obviously you thought the cost was worth the extra size on the screen... I am just afraid the size of the unit would block some of my view in the cockpit. As above, not an issue with us on our 1974 "M" model What about using this AirMap 1000 on a suction cup mount connected to the lower left side of the front windscreen? Workable? Yes, should work OK, but when it gets bumpy, having your thumbs/hands/buttons/GPS and yoke locked together takes the pain out of the operation.. .. We REALLY happy with the AM..But that is just us, YMMV! Good luck.. Happy to answer any other ???? U may have... As you may guess by now, we tried several (in other 172's) and we shopped hard ![]() Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Dave. Appreciate your input. I actually placed the order for
the AM1000 today. I will first try the Yoke Mount as suggested and if it becomes a distraction I will get one of those suction cup mounts for the windscreen. I think I will like the yoke mount, however, I am not so sure I will like the GPS turning with the yoke, that may be the gotcha for me... On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:38:47 -0400, Dave wrote: Hi Mike! On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 18:51:10 -0800, Mike 'Flyin'8' wrote: Dave, Thanks for your input! So if I mount the AM1000 on the Yoke, it does not block any of the instruments in the cockpit? I am 5' 9" , partner is 6'4". He says no, the knob on the mount blocks the 0 -800 RPM portion of the tach for me if I sit perfectly straight..shift my head to the right an inch or two, and my answer is no as well... When you turn the Yoke, does the AM1000 stay vertically aligned, or does it turn with the yoke? It turns with the yoke.. Since the AM500 and AM1000 are pretty much the same unit (Except for size) Is the extra $200 a good trade off for screen size? Yes, absolutely for us... I have not seen either of these units in person so I am not sure how dramatic the difference on the screen is... I drew out two boxes that are the exact size of the units, and the AM1000 is quite a bit bigger... I am certainly leaning toward either the AM500 or AM1000, but trying to justify the money in my head... If the AM500 does exactly what I want, and the screen/button size is usable then I would be happy. If however, the buttons are too small to be easily used during flight, then I would be very disappointed. My currrent solution is jsut not working... The PDA using GPS software and a CF card. It is just not practical. How the heck am I supposed to use the little stylus during flight... :-) I don't know either... the AM 1000 has large widely spaced buttons, easily reached with your thumbs while firmly holding the yoke. We tried several, and the most difficult was a Garmin 196 mounted at arms length in the center of the panel. OK on the ground, but in rough air, just try to push a small (correct) button at arms length with you (and your hand) moving opposite to the panel in rough conditions. Obviously you thought the cost was worth the extra size on the screen... I am just afraid the size of the unit would block some of my view in the cockpit. As above, not an issue with us on our 1974 "M" model What about using this AirMap 1000 on a suction cup mount connected to the lower left side of the front windscreen? Workable? Yes, should work OK, but when it gets bumpy, having your thumbs/hands/buttons/GPS and yoke locked together takes the pain out of the operation.. . We REALLY happy with the AM..But that is just us, YMMV! Good luck.. Happy to answer any other ???? U may have... As you may guess by now, we tried several (in other 172's) and we shopped hard ![]() Dave Mike Alexander PP-ASEL Temecula, CA See my online aerial photo album at http://flying.4alexanders.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
I will get one of those suction cup mounts for the windscreen. You'll be pulling it out of the carton the AM1000 came in - it's included. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Garmin has a beanbag mount for the smaller portables. I keep mine
on the glareshield with a piece of anti-skid rubber velcro'd to the bottom of the portable. There's no "head down" issue. I've tried the portable on the yoke and really hate it because that's where I keep the list of freqs I need. Since Garmin has officially declared the Pilot III as discontinued (but still supported with database) you could pick up a used one very reasonably and use that for a while and get used to it. Then turn around and sell it to buy something more fancy later on. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was researching the same thing 4 months ago.
Excellent suggestions from members of this group led me to purchase the Airmap 1000. No regrets. No need for the external antenna (in a 172 or 152). The screen, when mounted on the yoke does not block any of my instruments. It looks huge in the pictures, but is a good size for the yoke, in my opinion. Of course, I originally found myself looking at the unit when I should have been doing my scan of both the sky and instruments. With practice, I no longer do this. Whatever unit you get, I highly recommend sitting in the right seat while a friend flies and messing around with the unit. Folks told me to play with it at home, but it's nice to do it in a moving plane. Use of a wrist strap with the Airmap 1000 would probably result in carpal tunnel syndrome. I'm in the SF Bay area and find the unit telling me the actual boundaries of airspaces to be quite useful. With the secional, I know I'm 'close' but never actually sure of my position. The runway guidance feature is useful when approaching an unfamiliar airport. Then again, I'm a new pilot with 150 or so hours. Jonathan In Mike 'Flyin'8' wrote: Ok, first off, Sorry to do this to everyone yet again.... I can not find all the information I seek, so I ask all the experts here. I am looking for information about the units I list below to help me make a decision. I am in the market for a protable GPS. I am not sure which way to go, but I can say for cerrtain the about $600 is all I want to spend. Pretty much will settle for Grey Scale.... This means I am in the range of Airmap 1000, Airmap 500, Garmin 96, or if I push the $'s a bit a Garmin 196 may be within reach, but I think the wife would not be happy if I spent that much on a "toy." Though, I have tried to be convincing that it is a life saver in the event of emergency. Did I leave any decent units out that I should also consider? So.... Here are my questions... Airmap 1000 Questions: -Is the Airmap 1000 a bit too big for a portable GPS device? -Is the Wrist strap even worth messing with on a device this large? -Will this GPS device receive signals reliable without use of the external antenna? Airmap 500 and Garmin 96 Questions: -Sensitivity good without external antenna? (In a C172) -Again, Is the wrist strap worth even trying? Does it get in the way? Garmin 196 -It looks like this device has the ability to set on top of the dash in the plane with the antenna exposed through the windscreen. So I would imagine if left on top of the control panel an external antenna is not necessary. So, would an external be needed? -With the previous in mind, is this device usable if left on top of the panel? -Can you reach up and accurately press buttons as needed? -Is the screen large enough to see if left sitting on top of the Panel? General Questions: How do the GPS Yoke mounts work? I do not own a plane and rent, so is the Yoke Mount easibly removable, or should I forget that idea all together and just use a wrist strap? Does it work on a Cessna 172 without getting in the way? Is the wrist strap even worth messing with? Of the 4 GPS devices I have listed in or near my price range which is the best all around device for the money? I think the most important thing to me is the ability to acquire a signal without the use of an external antenna. I do not want wires running through the airplane getting in the way and interfering with the flight controls. Additionally, I want it to be usable while flying without causing too much distraction. By that I mean I do not want to be head down trying to figure out what button to push to switch modes. Single button presses to switch between functions would be ideal. Since I do not fly long trips a lot, battery life is not of real concern. I would be happy with about 4-5 hours battery life. Mike Alexander PP-ASEL Temecula, CA See my online aerial photo album at http://flying.4alexanders.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
How do the GPS Yoke mounts work? I do not own a plane and rent, so is the Yoke Mount easibly removable, or should I forget that idea all together and just use a wrist strap? Does it work on a Cessna 172 without getting in the way? Is the wrist strap even worth messing with? I would forget about wrist straps, period. The yoke mounts from RAM (I know they come with the Lowrances, don't know the Garmins) are excellent and work real well in Cessnas. Also, for stick aircraft or added felxibility, you will get a suction cup mount from Lowrance included in the price, too. If the suction cup is well designed - and everything from RAM is - the plane will break before it comes off. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas,
Also, for stick aircraft or added felxibility, Oh, and if you fly out of Carlsbad, as the photos on your site seem to imply, you WILL fly stick aircraft. Check out Pinnacle's DA40. One flight and you'll never look back. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carlsbad indeed. I am still a new pilot, so I am not ready to jump out of
my C172 just yet. :-) I am certaily anxious to try some new planes though. Thomas Borchert wrote: Thomas, Also, for stick aircraft or added felxibility, Oh, and if you fly out of Carlsbad, as the photos on your site seem to imply, you WILL fly stick aircraft. Check out Pinnacle's DA40. One flight and you'll never look back. -- Mike Flyin'8 PP-ASEL Temecula, CA http://flying.4alexanders.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Carlsbad indeed.
Are you flying with Pinnacle? I rented there last fall and really liked the outfit. Very professional. First place I've seen to turn away a prospective renter after the non-satisfactory check-out (another German, not very fluent in English and neither, it seemed, in Cessnas). Their DA-40 isn't much more expensive than the new 172s, if you factor in the higher speed - and it is a world apart. I'd recommend making the transition as soon as possible, if only because flying different types tremendously widens a pilot's horizon. Also, the visibility out of the "flying bubble" will blow you away, pure and simple. I might be coming back next fall... -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas,
I fly with a club, Pacific Coast Flyers. I actually live in Temecula, so it is about an hour drive to the airport. I am thinking of getting checked out at our local airport (French Valley) F70 to make my drive only 10 minutes. Are you flying with Pinnacle? I rented there last fall and really liked the outfit. Very professional. First place I've seen to turn away a prospective renter after the non-satisfactory check-out (another German, not very fluent in English and neither, it seemed, in Cessnas). -- Mike Flyin'8 PP-ASEL Temecula, CA http://flying.4alexanders.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Speech: A Question of Loyalty: Gen. Billy Mitchell | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 25th 04 09:30 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime | John | Piloting | 5 | November 20th 03 09:40 PM |
Question about Question 4488 | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | October 27th 03 01:26 AM |
Special Flight Setup Question (COF) | Dudley Henriques | Simulators | 4 | October 11th 03 12:14 AM |