![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:I4une.4992$Sl5.2242@trndny08... snippage "My father worked on the Martin assembly line in Baltimore." Hence the B26's other nickname: "The Baltimore Wh*re" ;O) Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Chandler, AZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 22:16:51 -0700, "Jay Beckman"
wrote: "George Patterson" wrote in message news:I4une.4992$Sl5.2242@trndny08... snippage "My father worked on the Martin assembly line in Baltimore." Hence the B26's other nickname: "The Baltimore Wh*re" ;O) The various nicknames such as the above "Baltimore Whore" and"The Flying Prostitute", referred to the airplanes ability to seemingly "fly without any visible means of support", due to it's extraordinarily short pair of wings. :-D Corky Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Corky,
Well put. The B-26 was the first high wing loading airplane the Army used and it demonstrated that the training procedures in use were way out of date and dangerous (as I recall, the wing loading is today considered no big deal - about the same as a Cessna 310 - but then it was completely new). Once the training got figured out, the airplane did extremely well, its speed made it valuable in combat. Naturally, having a nasty (and undeserved) initial reputation, it never really got over it and the Army dumped it, but after flying the kiddy car B-25, which is so very easy to fly, it's understandable why it was kept and the -26 dumped once peace rolled around. The horror stories of single engine handling ran around the block pretty fast, and were naturally exaggerated by pilots who weren't so hot in the first place and had to blame their own shortcomings on the airplane. With appropriate training, the airplane flew as well as anything else on one engine, however, Vmc was so high that there were circumstances (as with the B-25) where power on the good engine had to be reduced to maintain control of the airplane. A major part of the problems with the B-26 were due to the Curtiss Electric props, Prop malfunctions killed a lot of people and now the FAA will not approve the electrics on the remaining airplanes that had them, they have to use hydraulic props. Another challenge was that the generator switches were located behind the pilot's head (who designed switch positions back then?). If you forgot to turn on the generators (and many did because of the switch position and macho-posturing pilots who didn't use checklists), you had enough juice in the batteries to start, taxi out and takeoff. At that point the batteries went flat and the props ran away (went flat), which was nearly unrecoverable. All the best, Rick |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:03:52 GMT, "Mike Rapoport"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... An engine loss in a Garrett powered aircraft such as the Swearingen or MU-2 would be quite noticeable at any power setting. The Negative Torque Sensor (NTS) on the Garrett TPE331's will dump oil pressure from the prop dome when the engine flames out. The spring load on the prop will drive the prop to a high pitch, lower drag configuration, but does not feather the prop. The pilot must manually perform this task. I have been told that in a MU-2 with a four bladed prop, should an engine quit and the NTS fail, a minimun turn of 90 degress will occur before the pilot gets the prop feathered. The NTS should be checked every engine start and is a no go item should it not test properly. The Searingen Metro, like th MU-2, is a handful of airplane with 2 pilots and 2 engines. One pilot and one engine? ew....... G. Lee It is not quite as bad as all that. NTS failures on takeoff are saveable at least in the simulator but immediate feathering is required. The airplane will not yaw or roll 90 deg. I have experienced (in the simulator) NTS failures on takeoff in the Turbo Commander (TPE-331 powered) and agree that it was saveable in this airplane. I have also experienced uncommanded thrust reverser deployments in Citation Bravo Simulator and found this to be at least as much a handful as the NTS failure. Both simulators were at Flight Safety International and were full motion machines. Klein |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Tactical Air Control Party Airmen Help Ground Forces | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 22nd 04 02:20 AM |
How much could I get for these back issues? | Aaron Smith | Home Built | 8 | December 15th 03 12:07 PM |
Flight Simulator 2004 Control Issues | SouthBayGuy | Simulators | 22 | November 26th 03 04:31 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |