![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
Note though that it refers to "populated" places, not "congested" places. "Congested" has technical meaning in the FARs (regarding altitude rules), and it's not clear whether "populated" means the same thing. It doesn't. According to the local FAA, the beaches around here are congested areas during the summer season. They aren't congested in the winter. Sandy Hook during summer is an example of an unpopulated congested area. George Patterson Why do men's hearts beat faster, knees get weak, throats become dry, and they think irrationally when a woman wears leather clothing? Because she smells like a new truck. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:IFUte.272$2s.101@trndny02... Gary Drescher wrote: Note though that it refers to "populated" places, not "congested" places. "Congested" has technical meaning in the FARs (regarding altitude rules), and it's not clear whether "populated" means the same thing. It doesn't. According to the local FAA, the beaches around here are congested areas during the summer season. They aren't congested in the winter. Sandy Hook during summer is an example of an unpopulated congested area. Good point. I wonder though about the converse--are populated areas always considered congested, or can there be (sparsely) populated areas that are considered uncongested? --Gary |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/21/2005 06:40, Gary Drescher wrote:
"George Patterson" wrote in message news:IFUte.272$2s.101@trndny02... Gary Drescher wrote: Note though that it refers to "populated" places, not "congested" places. "Congested" has technical meaning in the FARs (regarding altitude rules), and it's not clear whether "populated" means the same thing. It doesn't. According to the local FAA, the beaches around here are congested areas during the summer season. They aren't congested in the winter. Sandy Hook during summer is an example of an unpopulated congested area. Good point. I wonder though about the converse--are populated areas always considered congested, or can there be (sparsely) populated areas that are considered uncongested? Well, the purpose of the detail on the chart is to provide visual cues as to your location with respect to the populated area. Not (as far as I know) to determine whether or not you are over a "congested" area. However, when I was flying ultralights (which cannot be flown over congested areas at all), my instructor would not let me fly over areas depicted as populated on the sectional. I think he was going overboard, but as a training rule, it was fine. From what I've seen/read, what is or is not a congested area is not defined well. Perhaps there are some 'legal interpretations' out there that I've not seen yet. --Gary -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Student Sacramento, CA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Drescher wrote:
Good point. I wonder though about the converse--are populated areas always considered congested, or can there be (sparsely) populated areas that are considered uncongested? Note that you will not find a definition of "congested" in any FAA document. It is deliberately undefined to allow for broadly varying enforcement. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/21/2005 04:06, Gary Drescher wrote:
"Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... On 6/20/2005 12:30, Teranews wrote: On a sectional chart, around cities, are yellow areas. What are they? Where on the legend can this be found? These represent the congested parts of the cities. This should (roughly) match the look of the city when lit up at night. ... http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/online/aero_guide Useful pointer--thanks! Note though that it refers to "populated" places, not "congested" places. "Congested" has technical meaning in the FARs (regarding altitude rules), and it's not clear whether "populated" means the same thing. Yes ... I meant Populated, not congested. Thanks for catching that. --Gary -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Student Sacramento, CA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I thought that it would make sense to look at the Aeronautical Chart Users
Guide, which is published for the specific purpose of answering questions like this. In the section "VFR Aeronautical Charts," under "Culture," we find that the yellow areas represent "Cities and Large Towns," with a larger blotch of yellow identified as "Large Cities." Nothing about lights or anything other than population. I tell my students to pay no attention to the boundaries of the yellow blotches, because there is no way to identify city limits from the air, and towns/cities simply change too fast for chart designations to make any sense. The only practical use of the yellow blotches is, in my opinion, to identify places where it is going to be difficult to find a place to land (in-town airports excluded). Bob Gardner "Teranews" wrote in message news:1119295818.456e1bd0d1dc4312bea6e25f65e9e825@t eranews... A pilot recently asked me a question, that I cannot find the answer to. On a sectional chart, around cities, are yellow areas. What are they? Where on the legend can this be found? My answer was "congested areas of a city or town" which I though sounded official enough to work. Ah-Ha, he says, "Show me." The specific area in question is just south of Sunriver, on the Klamath Falls sectional. (DSD 175 @ about 25nm) I've flown over it, and it is a combination of golf courses. Over beer last night, one fellow suggested that it is marked that way for "National Security Reasons". Wink, Wink, nudge, nudge, "You are not supposed to ask.", "Why do you think they left it off the legend." Am I just blind? Is the print too small? Can anyone else find it on the legend? Al Gerharter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Gardner wrote:
In the section "VFR Aeronautical Charts," under "Culture," we find that the yellow areas represent "Cities and Large Towns," with a larger blotch of yellow identified as "Large Cities." Nothing about lights or anything other than population. True, but they seem to follow the Army Field Manual on Topographic Symbols: b. Populated Places. A larger populated place is shown, generally true to shape, by an outlined and [yellow] tinted area. Within the outline, the only features usually shown are the mainline railroads and through-route roads. c. Use of Tinted Squares. In many areas, there is insufficient information available to plot the correct outlines of populated places. In such cases, tinted squares of varying sizes are used as symbols, with the size depending upon the population or importance. I tell my students to pay no attention to the boundaries of the yellow blotches, because there is no way to identify city limits from the air, and towns/cities simply change too fast for chart designations to make any sense. I dunno, some of the isolated smaller cities here in the Northeast do have matching outlines at night. I've even matched up some outlines during the day. The only practical use of the yellow blotches is, in my opinion, to identify places where it is going to be difficult to find a place to land (in-town airports excluded). Now that's definitely good advice, and a great use of the outline! Interestingly, I ran across an ultralight website where they described the yellow outlines as being off-limits to them, because they're obviously congested areas. Best regards, Kev |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/20/2005 17:52, Kev wrote:
Interestingly, I ran across an ultralight website where they described the yellow outlines as being off-limits to them, because they're obviously congested areas. Obviosly congested? No... These are city/town areas, but they include congested and non congested areas. The Ultralight club's rule is a good rule of thumb, but it's not a FAR. The thing about Ultralights is, they need to stay 'under the radar' such that they don't raise a lot of complaints and invite extra legislation prohibiting their use. So, rules like these keep them well outside the 'problem areas'. You can legally fly an ultralight through an area depicted in yellow on the sectional, you just need to fly over only un-congested areas. Best regards, Kev -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Student Sacramento, CA |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without disagreeing, I'd like to chime in that when learning pilotage,
I found the outlined areas on the TAC for LA to be very helpful at figuring out where I was with precision when all else failed. There are a lot of 'water towers' and 'radio masts' and whatnot there, so just because I'd find a likely looking landmark wouldn't mean I was where I thought I was. I had a hairy moment during my checkride trying to find an airport with a half washed out runway near Camarillo (I think it was Santa Maria) that the examiner wanted me to point out to him. The city outline helped me do some triangulation when ye olde Mk I Eyeball initially failed. Great examiner (GB should id him to the locals), not only did it give me a real challenge to demonstrate pilotage (and as a result 'put up or shut up'), but he didn't give me an engine failure while I was circling and looking, for which I'm grateful. ![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On a sectional chart, around cities, are yellow areas.
What are they? Places they are too lazy to chart. ![]() Actually, it's only half faceitous - in the yellow areas they do not chart =anything= (except for a few towers), which makes it hard to use for navigation. Even roads (which would be =excellent= landmarks at night) are omitted. /grouse Jose (r.a.student cut, as I don't follow that group) -- My other car is up my nose. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mystery lines on NY VFR terminal chart | Ron Garret | Piloting | 3 | May 22nd 05 05:07 AM |
Meaning of airport tick marks on sectional charts | Ross Oliver | Piloting | 7 | March 2nd 05 04:05 PM |
WAC Chart Images on line? | Rich | Owning | 5 | March 22nd 04 11:17 PM |
AVIATIONTOOLBOX: how I convert sectional maps to map chunks | Kyler Laird | General Aviation | 2 | December 4th 03 01:09 AM |
King Videos: Jeppesen Chart Review (2 tapes on eBay) Approaches & Enroute, Departures, & Arrivals | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | November 11th 03 05:14 PM |