![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think that all you have to do to make your "Lycoming" into a "pittss1c
Super Advanced Powerplant" is to remove the dataplate from the engine and attach one made by you. It is now uncertified and you would be free to do what you want with it. pittss1c wrote: "pittss1c" wrote snip I was just thinking, the designer sets the operating limitations of a homebuilt's engine. therefore one could define an engine based on lycoming parts (up to 100% lycoming) to have a max continous RPM of...say 2000. (as part of "your" design to get a higher TBO) If I was to build up an engine with parts out of my garage, I would set the operating limitations, and would set the Vne of my own design/airplane. Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott wrote:
I think that all you have to do to make your "Lycoming" into a "pittss1c Super Advanced Powerplant" is to remove the dataplate from the engine and attach one made by you. It is now uncertified and you would be free to do what you want with it. That was my take on it... If they ask too many questions tell them you have modified chevy rods in it ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
Weird Experimental Certificate wording - Normal? | Noel Luneau | Soaring | 7 | January 11th 05 02:53 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Onerous OPerating Procedures/Improper (illegal?) Use of Unicom Freq. | rjciii | Soaring | 2 | July 19th 03 07:55 PM |