Navy? C2/COD makes single engine, gear up landing.

I watched very little news on monday but I did get to see and hear the
interview with the helo pilot that was shooting the video. He was first
called in the help assess the situation. He talked directly with the
pilots and stated that they were securing the engine for safety (evac)
reasons.
Michelle

Morgans wrote:

"Michelle P" wrote



the right engine was secured for evacuation purposes. They did not want
anyone to run into a turning prop.



That makes perfect sense. How did you find out, or is that just the answer
that makes sense to you?

Dave S wrote in newsy9Me.7241$RS.2848
@newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net:

Just saw a video on local (Houston) news of a Grumman C2 making a belly
landing on a paved runway at Norfolk, VA. Over 25 souls on board,
everyone ok.

The left fan was turning, the right one was feathered. Apparently the
right engine failure prevented the gear from being extended. I would
have figured the military a/c would have the ability to extend the gear
inspite of an engine out.

Anyone familiar with the systems on these birds, and wether the right
engine is "critical" with regards to this function, or is there likely a
double failure of some kind (powerplant AND hydraulics).

Flaps were extended/down, but I am unsure if they were in full landing,
or approach setting, nor am I sure of how they are actuated.

Dave

The way the story reads on CNN, the nose gear came down but not the
main. After circling and going through emergency procedures, the
nose gear was raised and one engine shut down for the belly landing.
The arresting hook was used to stop the plane upon landing.

It appears the only malfunction is with the main gear not coming
down.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism

Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Blog: http://www.skywise711.com/Blog

Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?

After circling and going through emergency procedures, the
nose gear was raised and one engine shut down for the belly landing.
The arresting hook was used to stop the plane upon landing.

What advantage would this give?

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

"Jose" wrote

After circling and going through emergency procedures, the
nose gear was raised and one engine shut down for the belly landing.
The arresting hook was used to stop the plane upon landing.

What advantage would this give?

Save an engine, while still having power to adjust the approach, and using
the hook means you don't slide as far, chewing up the belly skins.
--
Jim in NC

Save an engine, while still having power to adjust the approach

I'm more wondering about retracting the nose wheel. Seems the nose
wheel would prevent a prop strike and provide some ground steering.

Jose
--
Quantum Mechanics is like this: God =does= play dice with the universe,
except there's no God, and there's no dice. And maybe there's no universe.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.

there is no ground effective steering with a tail hook. You stop when
you catch the wire.
Michelle

Jose wrote:

Save an engine, while still having power to adjust the approach


I'm more wondering about retracting the nose wheel. Seems the nose
wheel would prevent a prop strike and provide some ground steering.

Jose