Hurricane relief

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
ink.net...
I think you might be reading in racist coupling in Jay's dialog by "reading
triggers" that you personally associate with racist dialog where no racist
connotation or inflection was present.
I'm extremely sensitive to "reading" between the lines on Usenet and I can
find no racist inflection at all in what Jay has said.
Dudley Henriques


"TL" wrote in message


More like this

http://www.junkscience.com/images/nq050606.gif
http://www.junkscience.com/images/nq050608.gif
http://www.junkscience.com/images/nq050610.gif

"Doof" wrote in message
...

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote in message
ink.net...
I think you might be reading in racist coupling in Jay's dialog by
"reading triggers" that you personally associate with racist dialog where
no racist connotation or inflection was present.
I'm extremely sensitive to "reading" between the lines on Usenet and I
can find no racist inflection at all in what Jay has said.
Dudley Henriques


"TL" wrote in message


More like this

http://www.junkscience.com/images/nq050606.gif
http://www.junkscience.com/images/nq050608.gif
http://www.junkscience.com/images/nq050610.gif

Love this!

Being one of the more "logic oriented" thinkers in this world, and placing
great value on the scientific mind, my probable reaction to looking over the
edge of that cliff would be,
"You know.......I think I'll do some additional research on this gravity
thing before exploring this next data point requiring my leaping off here. I
have a funny feeling that Newton guy back at the lab just might be near a
breakthrough on this.......and besides, my wife wants that solution on
Fermat that I've been working on all week by tonight........or else!!!
:-))))))))))))))))))))))
Dudley Henriques

"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote:

I'm extremely sensitive to "reading" between the lines on Usenet and I can
find no racist inflection at all in what Jay has said.

I would submit, then, that some people here are better at reading
between the lines than you. They have called out Jay elsewhere, and
rightly so in my opinion. But lets examine only the words which
triggered my response.

Jay wrote, "[CNN] has been showing endless video of blacks looting and
shouting gibberish at the cameras, essentially since "Day One." It's
hard to imagine black people being presented in a worse light."
-- End Quote

Quite telling indeed. Racists watched the news coverage and saw
little more than black people looting and "shouting gibberish at the
cameras." Realists, on the other hand, watched the same news coverage
and saw a small percentage of black residents looting while tens of
thousands of law abiding blacks at the convention center made
desperate pleas food and water.

Jay wrote, "It's hard to imagine black people being presented in a
worse light." His, however, is a racist's take not a realist's take.
What the news coverage presented to the realist was a handful of
lawless among a sea of law abiding citizens doing exactly as
instructed under extremely trying circumstances.

Jay watched the news coverage and heard only "gibberish" in the
desperate cries for help. Did FEMA director Michael Brown also hear
only "gibberish"? I would not be surprised.

Apparently, in your world, one can not use the word "gibberish" in the same
sentence with the word "black" and not be a racist. That's bull ****!
Quite frankly, I don't really care if you think someone is a racist or not.
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. If you see a racist
inflection in what someone says, there is very little chance of anyone
changing your mind by disagreeing with you on Usenet.
In other words, think what you like. As an extension of your line of
thinking, I would also be a racist by the simple fact I have objected to
your position.
People like you I just try to avoid :-)
DH

"TL" wrote in message
...
"Dudley Henriques" dhenriques@noware .net wrote:

I'm extremely sensitive to "reading" between the lines on Usenet and I can
find no racist inflection at all in what Jay has said.

I would submit, then, that some people here are better at reading
between the lines than you. They have called out Jay elsewhere, and
rightly so in my opinion. But lets examine only the words which
triggered my response.

Jay wrote, "[CNN] has been showing endless video of blacks looting and
shouting gibberish at the cameras, essentially since "Day One." It's
hard to imagine black people being presented in a worse light."
-- End Quote

Quite telling indeed. Racists watched the news coverage and saw
little more than black people looting and "shouting gibberish at the
cameras." Realists, on the other hand, watched the same news coverage
and saw a small percentage of black residents looting while tens of
thousands of law abiding blacks at the convention center made
desperate pleas food and water.

Jay wrote, "It's hard to imagine black people being presented in a
worse light." His, however, is a racist's take not a realist's take.
What the news coverage presented to the realist was a handful of
lawless among a sea of law abiding citizens doing exactly as
instructed under extremely trying circumstances.

Jay watched the news coverage and heard only "gibberish" in the
desperate cries for help. Did FEMA director Michael Brown also hear
only "gibberish"? I would not be surprised.

"TL" wrote in message news:

Jay wrote, "[CNN] has been showing endless video of blacks looting and
shouting gibberish at the cameras, essentially since "Day One." It's
hard to imagine black people being presented in a worse light."
-- End Quote

Quite telling indeed. Racists watched the news coverage and saw
little more than black people looting and "shouting gibberish at the
cameras." Realists,

Godlike. Did you watch the coverage?

on the other hand, watched the same news coverage
and saw a small percentage of black residents looting while tens of
thousands of law abiding blacks at the convention center made
desperate pleas food and water.

Jay wrote, "It's hard to imagine black people being presented in a
worse light." His, however, is a racist's take not a realist's take.

Hey stoopid! Did you watch the coverage?

What the news coverage presented to the realist was a handful of
lawless among a sea of law abiding citizens doing exactly as
instructed under extremely trying circumstances.

Hey stoopid! Did you watch the coverage? They sure milked the "sea of law
abiding citizens" part for all it was worth. Not. Idiot.

moo

"TL" wrote in message
...
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

What's kind of interesting, in this whole thing, is that CNN (the supposed
"liberal" news outlet ) has been showing endless video of blacks looting
and
shouting gibberish at the cameras, essentially since "Day One." It's hard
to imagine black people being presented in a worse light.

That fellow who killfiled you was correct, you are a racist.

Idiot. Misinterpretation is borderline stupid. Failure to learn history,
in this case, the OP's is moronic. Rome was saved by the cackling of its
faithful geese Your efforts are, at once, boring and wasted.

moo

Jay Honeck wrote:


Sadly, I know all of this because I just spent the last 3 days dealing
with my mother-in-law's death, which meant endless hours sitting in hotel
rooms

My deepest condolences, Jay.

--
Saville

Replicas of 15th-19th century nautical navigational instruments:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/backstaffhome.html

Restoration of my 82 year old Herreshoff S-Boat sailboat:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/SBOATrestore.htm

Steambending FAQ with photos:

http://home.comcast.net/~saville/Steambend.htm

Sadly, I know all of this because I just spent the last 3 days dealing
with my mother-in-law's death, which meant endless hours sitting in hotel
rooms

My deepest condolences, Jay.

Thanks, Saville. Actually (and naturally) it's Mary who is taking it the
hardest.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"