A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Help Our UAL Friends



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 19th 05, 10:42 PM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"sfb" wrote in message news:luAXe.1713$Az1.376@trnddc07...
I suggest you lock up the Congress critters as UAL and the other legacy
carriers are only doing what the law permits. If they were ignoring the
law, the SEC would have done a number on them long ago for incorrect
financial reporting by a public company.


I think that the time has come and past, where companies can so easily dodge
a pension plan's obligations. There should be laws passed to protect all
pension plans, by holding them in trust, or whatever means are necessary.
Allowing them to dodge them is, IMHO, a breach of contract.

Who is going to pay for all of the people who lose their pension, as they
get aged, and were planing to live off it? You and I, the younger worker,
one way or the other.
--
Jim in NC

  #2  
Old September 19th 05, 10:00 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Morgans" wrote in message
...

Who is going to pay for all of the people who lose their pension, as they
get aged, and were planing to live off it? You and I, the younger worker,
one way or the other.


Yes, because money will be taken from us unlawfully and given to them. So
what good are laws?


  #3  
Old September 20th 05, 02:49 AM
Capt.Doug
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Morgans" wrote in message I think that the time has come and past, where
companies can so easily dodge
a pension plan's obligations. There should be laws passed to protect all
pension plans, by holding them in trust, or whatever means are necessary.
Allowing them to dodge them is, IMHO, a breach of contract.


There ARE laws in place. And there are a few Congress critters who exercise
intelligence of a higher order. A couple of them wrote guidelines for
'defined contribution plans (401k)'. Most workers with defined benefit plans
scoffed at 401k plans, but 401Ks aren't looking so bad now. Which plan do
the profitable carriers offer?

D.


  #4  
Old September 19th 05, 10:02 PM
Montblack
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

("sfb" wrote)
I suggest you lock up the Congress critters as UAL and the other legacy
carriers are only doing what the law permits. If they were ignoring the
law, the SEC would have done a number on them long ago for incorrect
financial reporting by a public company.



25% of this country's economic problems can be directly traced back to the
SEC and their inability to come up with clear accounting rules - and then
enforce them in any meaningful way. [Cite? Me]

Agreed on point A: Pensions should be off limits to Lee Iacocca CEO types.
Over funded
my ass -- for today maybe. How about in 12 years? Oops, a turn around in the
numbers? "Congress" (meaning you$$ you$$ you$$ and you$$) ..."help!!"


Montblack

  #5  
Old September 20th 05, 03:29 AM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Montblack" wrote in message
...
("sfb" wrote)
I suggest you lock up the Congress critters as UAL and the other legacy
carriers are only doing what the law permits. If they were ignoring the
law, the SEC would have done a number on them long ago for incorrect
financial reporting by a public company.



25% of this country's economic problems can be directly traced back to the
SEC and their inability to come up with clear accounting rules - and then
enforce them in any meaningful way. [Cite? Me]

Agreed on point A: Pensions should be off limits to Lee Iacocca CEO types.
Over funded
my ass -- for today maybe. How about in 12 years? Oops, a turn around in
the
numbers? "Congress" (meaning you$$ you$$ you$$ and you$$) ..."help!!"


Montblack


The company has an obligation to provide benefits and has to fund the plan
to provide for those benefits. Overfunding belongs to the Company.

Mike
MU-2


  #6  
Old September 19th 05, 09:16 PM
Aluckyguess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Carl Ellis" wrote in message
.. .

Closing the door after the cow leaves, but ...

The government needs to throw the *******s who underfunded the pension
plan
in prison. After that, no executive will consider letting a plan get in
that position.


- Carl -

Agreed, life in prison that would fix the problem. Throw the union leaders
in also. They are supposed to do something for their members.


  #7  
Old September 20th 05, 12:45 AM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Carl Ellis wrote:
Closing the door after the cow leaves, but ...

The government needs to throw the *******s who underfunded the pension plan
in prison. After that, no executive will consider letting a plan get in
that position.


Sounds like you are talking about the unions. The unions struck in
order to get this pension that UAL couldn't afford. However, you don't
know if it was underfunded BEFORE or AFTER the discount carriers ate
their lunch.

-Robert

  #8  
Old September 20th 05, 01:55 AM
Carl Ellis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Sounds like you are talking about the unions. The unions struck in
order to get this pension that UAL couldn't afford. However, you don't
know if it was underfunded BEFORE or AFTER the discount carriers ate
their lunch.


It's a pretty safe bet that it was underfunded well before. There not many
companies that fully fund the pensions - simply because they don't have to.

An intersting note is that company executives usually don't get personally
bit by the pension disasters. Their plans are often seperately and fully
funded.
  #9  
Old September 20th 05, 02:20 AM
sfb
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

By law a pension fund can't be underfunded. The problem is the actuarial
assumptions haven't been coming true especially the estimates on
investments of the pension fund.

The airlines are just the tip of the iceberg. There many local and state
government pension funds are also underfunded. You might be able to sell
some airplanes to fund the pensions, but who wants to buy a school?

"Carl Ellis" wrote in message
...

Sounds like you are talking about the unions. The unions struck in
order to get this pension that UAL couldn't afford. However, you
don't
know if it was underfunded BEFORE or AFTER the discount carriers ate
their lunch.


It's a pretty safe bet that it was underfunded well before. There not
many
companies that fully fund the pensions - simply because they don't
have to.

An intersting note is that company executives usually don't get
personally
bit by the pension disasters. Their plans are often seperately and
fully
funded.



  #10  
Old September 19th 05, 03:43 PM
RomeoMike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I have some empathy for these people, but they are not high on my list
of deserving victims. It's interesting that people want the government
out of their lives until they need something; then it's a run for the
taxpayers handout. Let this group of people ask the unions to make up
their pensions, IMO.



Orval Fairbairn wrote:
A neighbor, who is UAL (ret) asked me to circulate this one.

They make some pretty good points, as the UAL people currently stand to
get reamed pretty badly.

*****************

x: (202) 228-4260
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 09:45 PM
Inspiration by friends - mutal interest and motivation to get the PPL Gary G Piloting 1 October 29th 04 09:19 PM
USAFM Friends Journal EDR Piloting 0 February 13th 04 02:19 PM
Friends hold D.C. vigil for downed pilot Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 January 19th 04 01:58 AM
OT - For my American Friends funkraum Military Aviation 1 June 30th 03 09:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.