A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Turbo performance vs non-turbo



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 4th 05, 04:44 AM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt Barrow wrote:

I believe that's a Turbo Alley turbonormalizer, not a Turbo "supercharger".
If not, I suspect the STC might require some "beefing up" of certain parts.


According to the article, it's a RCM turbonormalization package which contains a
turbocharger. The turbocharger is made by Kelly Aerospace. They say they have
over 1600 hours on one Commander with it.

This unit keeps the manifold pressure at or below 28 PSI. I take it you were
describing systems that do not have this limitation.

George Patterson
Drink is the curse of the land. It makes you quarrel with your neighbor.
It makes you shoot at your landlord. And it makes you miss him.
  #2  
Old October 4th 05, 05:11 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"George Patterson" wrote in message
newsUm0f.35172$wb3.22707@trndny03...
Matt Barrow wrote:

I believe that's a Turbo Alley turbonormalizer, not a Turbo
"supercharger". If not, I suspect the STC might require some "beefing up"
of certain parts.


According to the article, it's a RCM turbonormalization package which
contains a turbocharger.


That sounds like being "sorta pregnant". A TN system has a TC, but the
popoff keeps it from running beyonf normal sea level pressure internally.


The turbocharger is made by Kelly Aerospace. They say they have over 1600
hours on one Commander with it.

This unit keeps the manifold pressure at or below 28 PSI.


That's about typical for a TN system. Mine keeps MP at or below 31.5 inches.

I take it you were describing systems that do not have this limitation.


A TN system will been a TC Lite :~)


--
Matt

---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO


  #3  
Old October 4th 05, 02:44 PM
jmk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Right. A turbonormalized engine never sees any more pressure than one
that is normally aspirated - it just sees it up to a high altitude.
Cooling (at high altitudes) may be an issue, but not cylinder pressure.

  #4  
Old October 6th 05, 02:42 PM
Paul kgyy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This is sort of OT, but the new Aviation Consumer this month has an
article on an SMA diesel installed in a C182. The SMA diesel uses 85"
MP on takeoff and pretty much stays there for the entire flight.

  #5  
Old October 6th 05, 08:00 PM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

sort of OT?

"Paul kgyy" wrote in message
ups.com...
This is sort of OT, but the new Aviation Consumer this month has an
article on an SMA diesel installed in a C182. The SMA diesel uses 85"
MP on takeoff and pretty much stays there for the entire flight.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ram Conversion Performance Specs? O. Sami Saydjari Owning 2 May 29th 05 04:37 PM
Why turbo normalizer? Robert M. Gary Piloting 61 May 20th 05 04:33 PM
Performance World Class design proposal iPilot Soaring 85 September 9th 04 09:11 PM
Kitfox 7/Rotax 914 Performance Questions Jim Carriere Home Built 2 January 22nd 04 04:55 PM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.